Mike32ct
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 8,412
- Reaction score
- 5,176
Anybody else see it? What did you think?
I thought it was pretty good.
I thought it was pretty good.
"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Red Dawn
- Thread starter Mike32ct
- Start date
"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"
She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
Victory Unlimited
Master Don Juan
Haven't seen it. But here's a question:
If you take away the non-debatable, 21st century special effects advantage, is it better than the old Patrick Swayze and Charlie Sheen version?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3iRNd9-sy4
If not, then the only "Wolverines" I'll probably be seeing are the ones starring Hugh Jackman. lol
If you take away the non-debatable, 21st century special effects advantage, is it better than the old Patrick Swayze and Charlie Sheen version?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3iRNd9-sy4
If not, then the only "Wolverines" I'll probably be seeing are the ones starring Hugh Jackman. lol
Mike32ct
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 8,412
- Reaction score
- 5,176
I remember the original version. The new one is somewhat less realistic and slightly more cheesy. So I wouldn't say it's better, but it's still good.
why is this movie such blatant propaganda? I remember the original being about a Soviet invasion of the U.S. (and it was pretty good). It should be different from all the other action movies where americans invade foreign countries and kick some a$$, no?
actually, it was supposed to be a Cuban invasion, which is laughable. ANY invasion is laughable. their ships, etc, would be NUKED, without a doubt, as would any massed ground forces. 
as long as the US has even 1/2 dozen nukes (we've got TEN THOUAND OF THEM) there will NEVER be an invasion, other than the one we ALLOW (1 million illegal alieans, EVERY ****in year!
as long as the US has even 1/2 dozen nukes (we've got TEN THOUAND OF THEM) there will NEVER be an invasion, other than the one we ALLOW (1 million illegal alieans, EVERY ****in year!"You Can't Argue a Woman Into Liking You"
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
PRMoon
Master Don Juan
I thought it was good entrainment. There are numerous holes in the plot line that are utterlly impossible , but it's a movie. It's not supose to be real, it's meant to entertain.
Can't wait for Pacific Rim. Also unrealistic but looks entertaining!
Can't wait for Pacific Rim. Also unrealistic but looks entertaining!