Mike32ct
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 8,412
- Reaction score
- 5,176
Anybody else see it? What did you think?
I thought it was pretty good.
I thought it was pretty good.
"I'm Not Looking for Anything Serious Right Now"
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
Red Dawn
- Thread starter Mike32ct
- Start date
"You Can't Argue a Woman Into Liking You"
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Victory Unlimited
Master Don Juan
Haven't seen it. But here's a question:
If you take away the non-debatable, 21st century special effects advantage, is it better than the old Patrick Swayze and Charlie Sheen version?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3iRNd9-sy4
If not, then the only "Wolverines" I'll probably be seeing are the ones starring Hugh Jackman. lol
If you take away the non-debatable, 21st century special effects advantage, is it better than the old Patrick Swayze and Charlie Sheen version?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3iRNd9-sy4
If not, then the only "Wolverines" I'll probably be seeing are the ones starring Hugh Jackman. lol
Mike32ct
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 8,412
- Reaction score
- 5,176
I remember the original version. The new one is somewhat less realistic and slightly more cheesy. So I wouldn't say it's better, but it's still good.
why is this movie such blatant propaganda? I remember the original being about a Soviet invasion of the U.S. (and it was pretty good). It should be different from all the other action movies where americans invade foreign countries and kick some a$$, no?
actually, it was supposed to be a Cuban invasion, which is laughable. ANY invasion is laughable. their ships, etc, would be NUKED, without a doubt, as would any massed ground forces. 
as long as the US has even 1/2 dozen nukes (we've got TEN THOUAND OF THEM) there will NEVER be an invasion, other than the one we ALLOW (1 million illegal alieans, EVERY ****in year!
as long as the US has even 1/2 dozen nukes (we've got TEN THOUAND OF THEM) there will NEVER be an invasion, other than the one we ALLOW (1 million illegal alieans, EVERY ****in year!"I'm Not Looking for Anything Serious Right Now"
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
PRMoon
Master Don Juan
I thought it was good entrainment. There are numerous holes in the plot line that are utterlly impossible , but it's a movie. It's not supose to be real, it's meant to entertain.
Can't wait for Pacific Rim. Also unrealistic but looks entertaining!
Can't wait for Pacific Rim. Also unrealistic but looks entertaining!