Mike32ct
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 8,412
- Reaction score
- 5,176
Anybody else see it? What did you think?
I thought it was pretty good.
I thought it was pretty good.
"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
Red Dawn
- Thread starter Mike32ct
- Start date
"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
Victory Unlimited
Master Don Juan
Haven't seen it. But here's a question:
If you take away the non-debatable, 21st century special effects advantage, is it better than the old Patrick Swayze and Charlie Sheen version?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3iRNd9-sy4
If not, then the only "Wolverines" I'll probably be seeing are the ones starring Hugh Jackman. lol
If you take away the non-debatable, 21st century special effects advantage, is it better than the old Patrick Swayze and Charlie Sheen version?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F3iRNd9-sy4
If not, then the only "Wolverines" I'll probably be seeing are the ones starring Hugh Jackman. lol
Mike32ct
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2007
- Messages
- 8,412
- Reaction score
- 5,176
I remember the original version. The new one is somewhat less realistic and slightly more cheesy. So I wouldn't say it's better, but it's still good.
why is this movie such blatant propaganda? I remember the original being about a Soviet invasion of the U.S. (and it was pretty good). It should be different from all the other action movies where americans invade foreign countries and kick some a$$, no?
actually, it was supposed to be a Cuban invasion, which is laughable. ANY invasion is laughable. their ships, etc, would be NUKED, without a doubt, as would any massed ground forces. 
as long as the US has even 1/2 dozen nukes (we've got TEN THOUAND OF THEM) there will NEVER be an invasion, other than the one we ALLOW (1 million illegal alieans, EVERY ****in year!
as long as the US has even 1/2 dozen nukes (we've got TEN THOUAND OF THEM) there will NEVER be an invasion, other than the one we ALLOW (1 million illegal alieans, EVERY ****in year!"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
PRMoon
Master Don Juan
I thought it was good entrainment. There are numerous holes in the plot line that are utterlly impossible , but it's a movie. It's not supose to be real, it's meant to entertain.
Can't wait for Pacific Rim. Also unrealistic but looks entertaining!
Can't wait for Pacific Rim. Also unrealistic but looks entertaining!