"I just moved here from Florida."

That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?

She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."

She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.

I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.

Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.

Read more...

Protests in France

Spaz

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
8,329
Reaction score
6,875
I take it the nail painting did not help calm you down? How about a glass of wine with your cats?

It is clear that I am trying to get something we agree on, by my adding clarifying elements to your statements.

It is also clear you just want to argue, as you are not interested in further improving upon that statement.

There are elements of truth in your statement, however statement 2 suggests that some action has already been taken towards permanent devaluatuon (This suggestion is false). This is why I changed "action" to "intent".

Then I added the actual act of devaluation (printing) to the end.

Is there something you disagree with here?
My statement can either be true or false, saying it's true then changing is as a false is a deceitful tactic used by liars.

Is that a yes or a no to the truthfulness of my statement below ?

Hurry up and stop with the dilly-dallying tactics. You had a whole day to come up with lies to counter this truth.

The devaluation of currency done by China is to spur growth via cheaper exports.

The printing of more money is the consequences of that action.

The only one here using his feelings to influence the way he thinks is you.

Or you're slow minded to comprehend simple economic mechanism lmaoooo
 

"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"

She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.

You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.

She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.

The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.

Read more...

U

user43770

Guest
Of what? Be specific.

I was referring to your statement that if everyone was poor, there would be no corruption.

Bull**** statement #1. This is a strawman fallacy. Which liberal advocated making everyone poor?

You didn't say it, but you implied it. You're dodging it now, as every liberal does.


No, you made a false statement when you said "great many" people are gaming the welfare system. This is an anecdotal fallacy.

Please tell me how this is a fallacy. Where do you live? Do you not know someone that's gaming the system? I know of many.

This is Bull**** statement #2. Here you imply that anyone who thinks America shouldn't socialize the rich feels that way out of jealousy.

I never said America should pay for the rich, only that she shouldn't pay for the parasitic, poor underclass. Especially when people like you advocate open borders.
Responses in bold.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
1. Strawman fallacy - misrepresentating your opponents argument to make it easier to attack. No implication or statement made from me about poor vs. corruption. Only rich vs. corruption was mentioned. This is lie #1.

2. Lie #2. Poor was never mentioned. You assume me attacking the corrupt wealthy is an endorsement of “making society poor.” Your argument again is a strawman.

3. Anecdotal fallacy - using a personal experience instead of sound scientific evidence. Your question directed at me is designed to overestimate the probability of such occurrences in the welfare system. Rather than provide data, you assume that if one witnesses a single case of fraud, it must be widespread.

4: Really? Let’s see: Do you support the Republican tax bill?
 

wifehunter

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
5,145
Reaction score
3,302
Age
52
Location
Hoe County, California
Come on guys...remember who the enemy is....the banks.
 
U

user43770

Guest
1. Strawman fallacy - misrepresentating your opponents argument to make it easier to attack. No implication or statement made from me about poor vs. corruption. Only rich vs. corruption was mentioned. This is lie #1.

2. Lie #2. Poor was never mentioned. You assume me attacking the corrupt wealthy is an endorsement of “making society poor.” Your argument again is a strawman.

3. Anecdotal fallacy - using a personal experience instead of sound scientific evidence. Your question directed at me is designed to overestimate the probability of such occurrences in the welfare system. Rather than provide data, you assume that if one witnesses a single case of fraud, it must be widespread.

4: Really? Let’s see: Do you support the Republican tax bill?
You fvcker. You're gonna make me get on my laptop.
 

"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"

She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.

You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.

She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.

The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.

Read more...

U

user43770

Guest
1. Strawman fallacy - misrepresentating your opponents argument to make it easier to attack. No implication or statement made from me about poor vs. corruption. Only rich vs. corruption was mentioned. This is lie #1.

2. Lie #2. Poor was never mentioned. You assume me attacking the corrupt wealthy is an endorsement of “making society poor.” Your argument again is a strawman.

3. Anecdotal fallacy - using a personal experience instead of sound scientific evidence. Your question directed at me is designed to overestimate the probability of such occurrences in the welfare system. Rather than provide data, you assume that if one witnesses a single case of fraud, it must be widespread.

4: Really? Let’s see: Do you support the Republican tax bill?
1. You implicitly stated that if everyone were poor, there would be no corruption. What do you think that means?

2. You mentioned the poor, per number 1. Obviously, socialism makes a society poor. It's been proven many times. People like you seem to think that if there is a mix of it with capitalism, everything will be ok.

3. Not sure where you live. Maybe you don't see grown men standing around a store there?
 

Fzatf

Senior Don Juan
Joined
Apr 18, 2012
Messages
403
Reaction score
221
Age
38
Location
USA
1. You implicitly stated that if everyone were poor, there would be no corruption. What do you think that means?

2. You mentioned the poor, per number 1. Obviously, socialism makes a society poor. It's been proven many times. People like you seem to think that if there is a mix of it with capitalism, everything will be ok.

3. Not sure where you live. Maybe you don't see grown men standing around a store there?
We already do have a mix of socialism with capitalism in the USA. Social Security and Medicare help the elderly and disabled survive when they are no longer able to be entirely self sufficient. The military is funded by the people and also demonstrates socialism within a system that is driven by capitalism.

Partial socialism can work so long as primary market forces are capitalistic. Unchecked capitalism leads to vast income inequality and monopolies as a minority hold the wealth and the majority are left with scraps. Requiring a minimum wage that allows workers to thrive helps ensure they can afford the goods that keep the economy moving.
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
1. You implicitly stated that if everyone were poor, there would be no corruption. What do you think that means?
People who repeat lies are called liars. Rather than address my rebuttal, you repeat the lie.

2. You mentioned the poor, per number 1. Obviously, socialism makes a society poor. It's been proven many times. People like you seem to think that if there is a mix of it with capitalism, everything will be ok.
Repeating lie #2 again as your premise. Link where I mentioned the poor and corruption.

3. Not sure where you live. Maybe you don't see grown men standing around a store there?
Not sure why location is relevant. I do live in New Jersey - the wealthiest state in the US. We’re more than generous with social programs here. I’m sure you live in one of those ****hole red states.
 

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

Spaz

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
8,329
Reaction score
6,875
Macron flees from angry mob attacking his office. What a pvssy.

https://mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN1P00KG
He's stupid and an entitled little b1tch that's more worried about rich corporations butt fvcking him.

He should not tax diesel for public transport, assuage the general public, gain support to revamp other needed reforms.

He should just increase diesel tax only for industrial usage and heavy transportation because they can afford it.
 

wifehunter

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
5,145
Reaction score
3,302
Age
52
Location
Hoe County, California
You guys should watch this. History is repeating, minus the beheadings.

Macron should be thankful, he still has his.

 

Spaz

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
8,329
Reaction score
6,875
You guys should watch this. History is repeating, minus the beheadings.

Macron should be thankful, he still has his.

Nah. He's just plain stupid.

There's already a precedent in other less develop countries that just float their fuel price and some even subsidise it to placate the general public.

They then tax rich companies using industrial fuel.
 

wifehunter

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
5,145
Reaction score
3,302
Age
52
Location
Hoe County, California
Nah. He's just plain stupid.

There's already a precedent in other less develop countries that just float their fuel price and some even subsidise it to placate the general public.

They then tax rich companies using industrial fuel.
How does that work, in a global depression?
 

"So, What Do You Do for Fun?"

She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.

Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.

The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.

Read more...

wifehunter

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
5,145
Reaction score
3,302
Age
52
Location
Hoe County, California
What depression ?

Last internal report I got was that world growth was at 3% plus and that was 2 months ago.
You might want to get a second opinion, or even 5, on that. Just to insure against human biases or errors.
 

Spaz

Banned
Joined
Jan 14, 2018
Messages
8,329
Reaction score
6,875
You might want to get a second opinion, or even 5, on that. Just to insure against human biases or errors.
MNC internal reporting on world economy actually reflects what's actually on the ground rather then biased Govt reports lmao
 

wifehunter

Master Don Juan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
5,145
Reaction score
3,302
Age
52
Location
Hoe County, California
MNC internal reporting on world economy actually reflects what's actually on the ground rather then biased Govt reports lmao
I get news from multiple sources.
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

Top