You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
Wtf are you talking about?J. Darko said:You just tried to abuse science to back up the PUA-sh*t you preach on this forum and failed miserably by misinterpreting the article. Yes, the article says that the one who invests the most will also try the hardest to prove himself or herself to the other. However, that isn't a reason to invest the least in the relationship because first, the article says that it puts the other partner in a world of hurt and second the article suggests it's necessary to balance the investment.
So please, stop teaching and preaching this less emotional investment crap. It's pseudoscience: a misinterpretation of science that is used by so-called PUA's to sell their books and keep already desperate guys even further away fron girls.
Stop this fraud right now!
Everybody knows...Oh really? How do you know? Do you know what all 6 billion people on this planet are thinking? I doubt that. All you can base your opinion on is your own subjective experiece and some deluded internet heroes on a board. No proof at all and if you read this article, you see that science isn't on your side either.Ease said:Wtf are you talking about?
It doesnt take a science article to know this fact. Everyone knows he who cares less, has power. Not caring is gold for relationship management. It solves 90% of relationship problems.
This is basic, i cant believe people cant come to terms with the basics. Any p*ssy that can't come to terms with male superiority in a relationship needs to get the **** to loveshack asap.
Everybody knows...Oh really? How do you know? Do you know what all 6 billion people on this planet are thinking? I doubt that. All you can base your opinion on is your own subjective experience and some deluded internet heroes on a board. No proof at all and if you read this article, you see that science isn't on your side either.Ease said:Wtf are you talking about?
It doesnt take a science article to know this fact. Everyone knows he who cares less, has power. Not caring is gold for relationship management. It solves 90% of relationship problems.
This is basic, i cant believe people cant come to terms with the basics. Any p*ssy that can't come to terms with male superiority in a relationship needs to get the **** to loveshack asap.
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
You need some serious anger management. Why are you so butt-hurt over me posting an article on a website? It was food for thought, not gospel truth.J. Darko said:You just tried to abuse science to back up the PUA-sh*t you preach on this forum and failed miserably by misinterpreting the article. Yes, the article says that the one who invests the most will also try the hardest to prove himself or herself to the other. However, that isn't a reason to invest the least in the relationship because first, the article says that it puts the other partner in a world of hurt and second the article suggests it's necessary to balance the investment.
So please, stop teaching and preaching this less emotional investment crap. It's pseudoscience: a misinterpretation of science that is used by so-called PUA's to sell their books and keep already desperate guys even further away fron girls.
Stop this fraud right now!
Well, you've hit upon the main weakness of internet discussions: any moron can chime in. But let's forget that and address the article...DJjazzyJeff said:You need some serious anger management. Why are you so butt-hurt over me posting an article on a website? It was food for thought, not gospel truth.