Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
Wtf are you talking about?J. Darko said:You just tried to abuse science to back up the PUA-sh*t you preach on this forum and failed miserably by misinterpreting the article. Yes, the article says that the one who invests the most will also try the hardest to prove himself or herself to the other. However, that isn't a reason to invest the least in the relationship because first, the article says that it puts the other partner in a world of hurt and second the article suggests it's necessary to balance the investment.
So please, stop teaching and preaching this less emotional investment crap. It's pseudoscience: a misinterpretation of science that is used by so-called PUA's to sell their books and keep already desperate guys even further away fron girls.
Stop this fraud right now!
Everybody knows...Oh really? How do you know? Do you know what all 6 billion people on this planet are thinking? I doubt that. All you can base your opinion on is your own subjective experiece and some deluded internet heroes on a board. No proof at all and if you read this article, you see that science isn't on your side either.Ease said:Wtf are you talking about?
It doesnt take a science article to know this fact. Everyone knows he who cares less, has power. Not caring is gold for relationship management. It solves 90% of relationship problems.
This is basic, i cant believe people cant come to terms with the basics. Any p*ssy that can't come to terms with male superiority in a relationship needs to get the **** to loveshack asap.
Everybody knows...Oh really? How do you know? Do you know what all 6 billion people on this planet are thinking? I doubt that. All you can base your opinion on is your own subjective experience and some deluded internet heroes on a board. No proof at all and if you read this article, you see that science isn't on your side either.Ease said:Wtf are you talking about?
It doesnt take a science article to know this fact. Everyone knows he who cares less, has power. Not caring is gold for relationship management. It solves 90% of relationship problems.
This is basic, i cant believe people cant come to terms with the basics. Any p*ssy that can't come to terms with male superiority in a relationship needs to get the **** to loveshack asap.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
You need some serious anger management. Why are you so butt-hurt over me posting an article on a website? It was food for thought, not gospel truth.J. Darko said:You just tried to abuse science to back up the PUA-sh*t you preach on this forum and failed miserably by misinterpreting the article. Yes, the article says that the one who invests the most will also try the hardest to prove himself or herself to the other. However, that isn't a reason to invest the least in the relationship because first, the article says that it puts the other partner in a world of hurt and second the article suggests it's necessary to balance the investment.
So please, stop teaching and preaching this less emotional investment crap. It's pseudoscience: a misinterpretation of science that is used by so-called PUA's to sell their books and keep already desperate guys even further away fron girls.
Stop this fraud right now!
Well, you've hit upon the main weakness of internet discussions: any moron can chime in. But let's forget that and address the article...DJjazzyJeff said:You need some serious anger management. Why are you so butt-hurt over me posting an article on a website? It was food for thought, not gospel truth.