Passion Paradox and why you should always care less

[DJjazzyJeff]

Scientific reasoning for why you should invest less in a relationship. Scroll down midway to Passion Paradox:

http://www.psychyclub.com/inside-love-history-science-and-paradox

 

[J. Darko]

You just tried to abuse science to back up the PUA-sh*t you preach on this forum and failed miserably by misinterpreting the article. Yes, the article says that the one who invests the most will also try the hardest to prove himself or herself to the other. However, that isn't a reason to invest the least in the relationship because first, the article says that it puts the other partner in a world of hurt and second the article suggests it's necessary to balance the investment.

So please, stop teaching and preaching this less emotional investment crap. It's pseudoscience: a misinterpretation of science that is used by so-called PUA's to sell their books and keep already desperate guys even further away fron girls.

Stop this fraud right now!

 

[Ease]

You just tried to abuse science to back up the PUA-sh*t you preach on this forum and failed miserably by misinterpreting the article. Yes, the article says that the one who invests the most will also try the hardest to prove himself or herself to the other. However, that isn't a reason to invest the least in the relationship because first, the article says that it puts the other partner in a world of hurt and second the article suggests it's necessary to balance the investment.

So please, stop teaching and preaching this less emotional investment crap. It's pseudoscience: a misinterpretation of science that is used by so-called PUA's to sell their books and keep already desperate guys even further away fron girls.

Stop this fraud right now!

Wtf are you talking about?

It doesnt take a science article to know this fact. Everyone knows he who cares less, has power. Not caring is gold for relationship management. It solves 90% of relationship problems.

This is basic, i cant believe people cant come to terms with the basics. Any p*ssy that can't come to terms with male superiority in a relationship needs to get the **** to loveshack asap.

 

[J. Darko]

Wtf are you talking about?

It doesnt take a science article to know this fact. Everyone knows he who cares less, has power. Not caring is gold for relationship management. It solves 90% of relationship problems.

This is basic, i cant believe people cant come to terms with the basics. Any p*ssy that can't come to terms with male superiority in a relationship needs to get the **** to loveshack asap.

Everybody knows...Oh really? How do you know? Do you know what all 6 billion people on this planet are thinking? I doubt that. All you can base your opinion on is your own subjective experiece and some deluded internet heroes on a board. No proof at all and if you read this article, you see that science isn't on your side either.

 

[J. Darko]

Wtf are you talking about?

It doesnt take a science article to know this fact. Everyone knows he who cares less, has power. Not caring is gold for relationship management. It solves 90% of relationship problems.

This is basic, i cant believe people cant come to terms with the basics. Any p*ssy that can't come to terms with male superiority in a relationship needs to get the **** to loveshack asap.

Everybody knows...Oh really? How do you know? Do you know what all 6 billion people on this planet are thinking? I doubt that. All you can base your opinion on is your own subjective experience and some deluded internet heroes on a board. No proof at all and if you read this article, you see that science isn't on your side either.

 

[DJjazzyJeff]

You just tried to abuse science to back up the PUA-sh*t you preach on this forum and failed miserably by misinterpreting the article. Yes, the article says that the one who invests the most will also try the hardest to prove himself or herself to the other. However, that isn't a reason to invest the least in the relationship because first, the article says that it puts the other partner in a world of hurt and second the article suggests it's necessary to balance the investment.

So please, stop teaching and preaching this less emotional investment crap. It's pseudoscience: a misinterpretation of science that is used by so-called PUA's to sell their books and keep already desperate guys even further away fron girls.

Stop this fraud right now!

You need some serious anger management. Why are you so butt-hurt over me posting an article on a website? It was food for thought, not gospel truth.

 

[Zarky]

You need some serious anger management. Why are you so butt-hurt over me posting an article on a website? It was food for thought, not gospel truth.

Well, you've hit upon the main weakness of internet discussions: any moron can chime in. But let's forget that and address the article...

It's best to have a fairly close balance with the man showing slightly less affection for the woman than vice-versa. If he shows no affection or only a tiny amount, the woman will feel bad and bail. If he shows too much, the woman will get bored and leave. I think you have to closely watch her interest level. But if she's going the same thing, then the relationship won't last, because if one starts backing away, the other will, which will cause the first to do it more, and turn into a vicious cycle where the parties will split.