"She Laughed All Night. Then She Ghosted You. Here's Why."
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
On Donald Sterling....
- Thread starter SgtSplacker
- Start date
"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Lol, people in my family study and practice law. And they dont think anything Ive said is off base. Seems to me you just have your own feelings about this and it influences your legal reasoning. No one is free from this effect, while sitting from afar and trying to judge a case they have nothing to do with.dasein said:
Dont act like youre the end-all, be-all of sound legal reasoning. Because we could both find articles and blogs written by students and law professionals that back up what we think.
No, you won't find any such thing that backs up your repeated claim from any legitimate legal source because it doesn't exist. No legitimate legal commentator or lawyer, and obviously none of those exist in your family if what you say about their opinions is true, would claim, erroneously, that the matter in question necessarily ended with the express wording in the NBA Constitution as you have over and over. For whatever reasons, Sterling decided to cede control to his wife and end the process where he did, but rest assured there were other options open to him, namely appeal procedures within the NBA structure, likely arbitration, and then proceeding to court, where he would have had a very strong case and likely counterclaims IMO.Jaylan said:
SgtSplacker
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,039
- Reaction score
- 504
That girl is hideous, I just don't understand...Espi said:
She baited Sterling into saying those things and now she's going to take her moments of glory and go all Lewinsky on the media.
And the media, so shocked at the comments are going to go ahead and put that conniving slore on their shows that is equally guilty of racism and more.