Its a simple formula, so simple I almost scorn myself for overgeneralizing.
Being good at life: You got your **** together. You work out, you have a decent career ( be it as an employee or even your own boss), and you make friends. These people are good at life. Being rich doesn't hurt. Women like guys who are good at life.
Being bad at life: usually the kind of guy who isn't too terribly intelligent, has made bad choices, and continues to just...suck. Sorry, a lot of people fall into this camp either by genetics or by their own choices. Some chose to cover this up by pretending game puts them in the first camp, but it doesn't. By putting women as an end goal, they automatically assume that their ephemeral success puts them in camp 1. whats worse is the sour grapes outlook, ' well i don't want a gold digger anyway, so its good not to be rich'.
No, but if your good at life, it doesn't matter if your rich. everything else is already working for you.
That's a little different than a guy doing Mystery Method routines which is essentially trying to trick a girl into THINKING you have value. You can't just insult or neg a girl a few times and think that's going to replace actual substance.
I guess its not surprising that once again I agree with something you post. Its becoming pretty common place these days.