Colossus
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 3,494
- Reaction score
- 543
http://www.kansascity.com/2014/01/22/4769468/judge-rules-kansas-sperm-donor.htm
Don't ever donate sperm.
Don't ever donate sperm.
"I just moved here from Florida."
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
Kansas sperm donor ordered to pay child support
- Thread starter Colossus
- Start date
"She Wants a Man, Not a Boy"
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
( . )( . )
Banned
He looks like a bit of a dipsh!t, that combined with the vest, the mere fact he entertained two dykes hetero fantasies of a child accessory and his willingness to allow an unnatural abomination to produce yet another statistically proven dysfunctional adult proves that this latest statistic just happens to be a textbook breadth of mind and bigger picture lacking progtard.
I'm in two minds on this one. However on this occasion I think a sh!tlib being bent over by his own system wins out. Every cloud has a silver lining and all that.
I'm in two minds on this one. However on this occasion I think a sh!tlib being bent over by his own system wins out. Every cloud has a silver lining and all that.
taiyuu_otoko
Master Don Juan
I guess that's one way to make some money off craigslist...
"She Wants a Man, Not a Boy"
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
Married Buried
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2012
- Messages
- 1,881
- Reaction score
- 70
This is probably the closest the sperm donor has been to getting laid.
This hideously bad ruling has one main message for men in this assh-le judge's jurisdiction, "statutory formalities, regardless of the aim of the statute or even its relevance, trump clear, express, written intent of individuals even when it is all parties' involved clear intent for no rights or obligations to result." In essence, just another way the government owns you and not vice versa. The sh-theads like this judge reach this conclusion via "church of the child" thinking, as in "nothing is more important to the world than the welfare of children," which has not been the technological case for hundreds of years. The whole "church of the child" public policy is based on a gigantic lie anyway in a country where we conduct millions of abortions a year. In essence what it really means is "nothing is more important that what a particular woman wants at any particular time"... because... gynocracy.
Under this ruling, by removing parties' clear intent from the equation, someone could pop you with a blackjack (or find you drunk, find you anesthetized in a hospital, knocked out after an accident), shock sperm out of you while you were knocked out, and you would STILL be liable to pay support for any child that resulted. That is the legal essence of this holding and it is vile. The same standard of jurisprudence would suggest that anyone who was knocked out and had organs stolen (like in the urban legend) would in fact be LIABLE to whomever received those organs if they were defective.
We are only one step away from randomly assigning liability for underfunded children to totally unrelated single men via lottery. Many jurisdictions already force support on nonpaternal men who don't do things just so. Random assignment through a "draft" system is literally all that is left in terms of male rights infringement.
Under this ruling, by removing parties' clear intent from the equation, someone could pop you with a blackjack (or find you drunk, find you anesthetized in a hospital, knocked out after an accident), shock sperm out of you while you were knocked out, and you would STILL be liable to pay support for any child that resulted. That is the legal essence of this holding and it is vile. The same standard of jurisprudence would suggest that anyone who was knocked out and had organs stolen (like in the urban legend) would in fact be LIABLE to whomever received those organs if they were defective.
We are only one step away from randomly assigning liability for underfunded children to totally unrelated single men via lottery. Many jurisdictions already force support on nonpaternal men who don't do things just so. Random assignment through a "draft" system is literally all that is left in terms of male rights infringement.
This is true to an extent, but what it really boils down to is 60% of every tax dollar goes to funding heart surgeries for 80 y.o.s who are living it up on SS we pay richly for (and they paid pennies for) together with savings windfalls they got due to govt manipulation/inflation of the mortgage markets. God bless our precious senior citizen "resource," the vastly improved golf handicaps and $500 drivers that we buy them. 25% goes to war machines to blow up our enemies. About 10% goes to troglodytic throwbacks and to make sure they keep having unhampered offspring insuring more troglodytic throwbacks in the future and that they never become extinct. The remaining 5% of funds actually runs the government. I wish I were exaggerating here, but that's a pretty fair summary of the federal budget. Jeebus.Danger said: