Women don't consider cheating as cheating because they know romance is a social convention.
Social conventions are those arbitrary rules and norms governing the countless behaviors all of us engage in every day without necessarily thinking about them, from shaking hands when greeting someone to driving on the right side of the road.
It's all made up. Like the matrix. Of course it benefits women that most men live in this matrix.
At some point in time, a bunch of homosexuals created "romance" during the renaissance period in European countries. Romance was originally between a man and another man (hence idealistic unconditional love). Only a man and his idealistic brain could come up with something like romance. Women were considered child bearers. They weren't even considered romantic partners. Romance was created by gays and had nothing to do with the love between a man and a woman.
Romance was created to depict a man's capacity to love idealistically and unconditionally. And by definition of this, he could only love another man this way, because women do not love unconditionally nor idealistically, lol. Approaching a woman this way is a recipe to getting cucked.
This is why all hopeless romantics get cucked. They are applying the wrong paradigm to women.
Romantic dating is a false paradigm that doesn't apply to men and women at all. Men dominate. Women submit, bare children, and take care of the household. There is nothing romantic about it. If women want to survive, then they have to seek a powerful man. And if men want to procreate, they have to seek young and supple women. It's just the way nature set it up. There is nothing idealistic about it. What does romance have to do with anything? It doesn't.
Nowadays, the social convention that is romance that originally came from homosexuals has morphed into "the love between man and woman". But it is not applicable. It is not something that women are biologically hooked up to follow. That's why "cheating" to them doesn't count.
It's ironic that romance is applied to women in modern times. And you can clearly see how it doesn't fit. If anything, romance serves as a trojan horse that allows women to take everything from a man, as you can clearly see in our court systems.
In traditional countries, it's about starting families and having children. Men serve their purpose and women serve their purpose. It's not about "romantic dating" or "trying to find the one."
When you hold women to romantic ideals, they will cheat. It's simply because they were not biologically created to love you like your mother did. In fact, they are repulsed by it. They were only meant to bare children and raise them and do what it is that women do.
I am not saying it's impossible for women to love you as a person. They are certainly capable of it. Especially if you are a great man that they admire. But this is not romantic love. This is more like human love, respect, and admiration, which is more real and authentic than the social convention that is romance.
This is why it is often preached that instead of trying to conquer this petty romance game, just be a great person. And surround yourself with great people. Take romance out of the picture and view women as human beings and hold them to basic human standards. If you want to start a family, get a women who can bear children.
Seeking a life partner to love you unconditionally - this is something that is completely made up, and by homosexuals no less. So it's not even applicable with women, lol.
Petty romance and idealistic delusions is why guys get into trouble. What they don't know is that romance was never meant to be about men and women in the first place. We have our natural roles to play. And if we don't play those roles, civilization extincts. America is going against gender roles, which is why it's on the verge of collapse like Rome.
Romance is the reason why supplication and entitled women are an epidemic in America. Guys look at women with rose colored glasses instead of simply holding them to basic human standards.
