That's some gangsta pimp sh*t right there
http://gawker.com/charming-prison-gang-leader-knocks-up-four-guards-hired-479547967
http://gawker.com/charming-prison-gang-leader-knocks-up-four-guards-hired-479547967
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
I've actually mentioned something before similar to this. As much as I am for self-improvement and am a big fan of being your best self, in the end, a woman who is attracted to you won't care whether you're a man of high or low moral character. The main thing they respond to is whether or not they feel some form of sexual attraction towards you.Danger said:I don't think one can discount what you say.....but looking at the larger story, a couple of those girls got tattoos of his name on their necks.
Additionally, we all know of women's propensity for "Bad Boys" and there is a plethora of documentation on women's love for the dark triad.....serial killers and such as a good example.
I am inclined this is just another extension of women unable to control their libido for a man that gets them wet. Unfortunately those men tend to be the scum of society with nothing to lose.
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
According to the article they targeted insecure broads.Aristippus said:I have to question the quality of these women. I don't think prison guard women are known for being the most attractive. I also have to question whether or not coercion was involved on some level, since he is a prison gang leader and also has outside connections. I don't think it's as simple as "he was so smooth" etc etc. Probably multiple things going on and no real way to tell if other factors weren't the main reason for this. Although I've heard that con men and convicts can be pretty charismatic when they want to be or at least convincing, which they use as a means to either con people or to gain a person's trust to get what they want.
The Post reports that an affidavit for search warrants of the guards’ homes stated that the gang “strategically recruited female officers who they thought had ‘low self-esteem and insecurities.
If they are "insecure" individuals they should not be allowed to do such jobs, wheter there are quotas or not.Slevin said:According to the article they targeted insecure broads.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
The charge they should get is even worse. It's called "custodial rape" and is based upon violating a position of trust. Of course that charge was designed for male cops and guards who have sex with female inmates, but the law is supposed to apply the same under these circumstances. It is up to the discretion of the prosecutor and the judge, though. I doubt they will be punished the same as a man who did the same thing.mrRuckus said:Are the women charged with rape?
I have to ask the question. Is there such a thing as QUALITY women?Aristippus said:The road to self-improvement can lead to a higher probability of getting QUALITY women