That's some gangsta pimp sh*t right there
http://gawker.com/charming-prison-gang-leader-knocks-up-four-guards-hired-479547967
http://gawker.com/charming-prison-gang-leader-knocks-up-four-guards-hired-479547967
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
I've actually mentioned something before similar to this. As much as I am for self-improvement and am a big fan of being your best self, in the end, a woman who is attracted to you won't care whether you're a man of high or low moral character. The main thing they respond to is whether or not they feel some form of sexual attraction towards you.Danger said:I don't think one can discount what you say.....but looking at the larger story, a couple of those girls got tattoos of his name on their necks.
Additionally, we all know of women's propensity for "Bad Boys" and there is a plethora of documentation on women's love for the dark triad.....serial killers and such as a good example.
I am inclined this is just another extension of women unable to control their libido for a man that gets them wet. Unfortunately those men tend to be the scum of society with nothing to lose.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
According to the article they targeted insecure broads.Aristippus said:I have to question the quality of these women. I don't think prison guard women are known for being the most attractive. I also have to question whether or not coercion was involved on some level, since he is a prison gang leader and also has outside connections. I don't think it's as simple as "he was so smooth" etc etc. Probably multiple things going on and no real way to tell if other factors weren't the main reason for this. Although I've heard that con men and convicts can be pretty charismatic when they want to be or at least convincing, which they use as a means to either con people or to gain a person's trust to get what they want.
The Post reports that an affidavit for search warrants of the guards’ homes stated that the gang “strategically recruited female officers who they thought had ‘low self-esteem and insecurities.
If they are "insecure" individuals they should not be allowed to do such jobs, wheter there are quotas or not.Slevin said:According to the article they targeted insecure broads.
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
The charge they should get is even worse. It's called "custodial rape" and is based upon violating a position of trust. Of course that charge was designed for male cops and guards who have sex with female inmates, but the law is supposed to apply the same under these circumstances. It is up to the discretion of the prosecutor and the judge, though. I doubt they will be punished the same as a man who did the same thing.mrRuckus said:Are the women charged with rape?
I have to ask the question. Is there such a thing as QUALITY women?Aristippus said:The road to self-improvement can lead to a higher probability of getting QUALITY women