jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
It's much easier than it seems. We must learn to recognize the reality of pragmatism.
Most LTR's (> 5 years) are sustained, for these reasons:
1) Relationship since adolescence
2) Lack of alternatives
3) (Sunk Cost Fallacy) Investments: of time, money, children, social commitments, work commitments, financial commitments such as mortgages, loans, etc., which people will justify as "sacrifices," "I'm doing it for the kids," etc.
4) Exclusion from social circles after 30, fear of being alone (outside "couples only here" groups)
5) Dynastic reasons: parents choose good matches for their heir children
6) . You say .
All the major troubles start to come to the surface after "major events," which are the following:
1) Birth of children
2) Marriage
3) Purchase of a home together
This explains why the divorce rate is high.
This explains why women initiate divorces.
This explains why monkeybranching is widespread (it's actually more of an instinct).
This, however, doesn't apply to everyone.
There are people who manage to do this, while others don't and instead remain alone.
It's a bit like saying, "Yeah, okay, I have this job now, it's good, it pays the bills, but it doesn't satisfy me, and if new opportunities arise, I'll leave and find a new job."
But in the meantime, we're left with the five points above, which are being developed as time passes and people need to take action.
So I believe that if solid relationships exist, it's more important to consider this fact, and that those people actually knew how to choose the right person after considering these factors. Or they already had past experiences that helped them grow.
These divorce you see, which are a big part of the statistic demographic out there, most occur at the start of the relationship, but people stay togheter, and as time goes on, "knots come to the comb".
That relationship shouldn't be there right at the beginning.
Most LTR's (> 5 years) are sustained, for these reasons:
1) Relationship since adolescence
2) Lack of alternatives
3) (Sunk Cost Fallacy) Investments: of time, money, children, social commitments, work commitments, financial commitments such as mortgages, loans, etc., which people will justify as "sacrifices," "I'm doing it for the kids," etc.
4) Exclusion from social circles after 30, fear of being alone (outside "couples only here" groups)
5) Dynastic reasons: parents choose good matches for their heir children
6) . You say .
All the major troubles start to come to the surface after "major events," which are the following:
1) Birth of children
2) Marriage
3) Purchase of a home together
This explains why the divorce rate is high.
This explains why women initiate divorces.
This explains why monkeybranching is widespread (it's actually more of an instinct).
This, however, doesn't apply to everyone.
There are people who manage to do this, while others don't and instead remain alone.
It's a bit like saying, "Yeah, okay, I have this job now, it's good, it pays the bills, but it doesn't satisfy me, and if new opportunities arise, I'll leave and find a new job."
But in the meantime, we're left with the five points above, which are being developed as time passes and people need to take action.
So I believe that if solid relationships exist, it's more important to consider this fact, and that those people actually knew how to choose the right person after considering these factors. Or they already had past experiences that helped them grow.
These divorce you see, which are a big part of the statistic demographic out there, most occur at the start of the relationship, but people stay togheter, and as time goes on, "knots come to the comb".
That relationship shouldn't be there right at the beginning.