"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

It pisses me off

logicallefty

Moderator
Joined
Apr 26, 2006
Messages
6,000
Reaction score
5,151
Age
52
Location
Northeast Florida, USA
This is the most peculiar narrative. Protestors of police brutality have no motive nor the desire to caravan out to rural America. It’s a local community issue that ironically features non-resident police officers and outside agitators coming in.
So if I were a “”protester”” what motivation would I have to drive to a town in another State to damage businesses I have never done business with ?
 

“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

Trez

Banned
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
473
Reaction score
226
Age
38
So to clarify:

It’s not unarmed people getting shot in the back or being killed by police in ones own apartment that angers you - it’s the protests?
These protestors don't give a sh1t about alleged victims of police brutality. In sociology there's a phenomenon called "mob mentality" they just want a reason to be destructive. They're using these protests as an outlet to unload all of their stress and anger all at once.

In my city blm asked a local store to paint a mural on the side of his building and they had a ceremony and left a bunch of flowers and this is on the white side of town.

I've had black people here compliment my maga hat. A lot of black people here are not in agreement with these protests( riots).

Just like in Baltimore where I watched a few black men beat the sh1t out of some old white lady because a black man died at the hands of police that weren't white, the sheriff was black, the mayor was black, the prosecutor was black, but SOMEHOW its white peoples fault. This is why I condemn black lives matters, and it's obvious why condemn antifa.
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
These protestors don't give a sh1t about alleged victims of police brutality. In sociology there's a phenomenon called "mob mentality" they just want a reason to be destructive. They're using these protests as an outlet to unload all of their stress and anger all at once.

In my city blm asked a local store to paint a mural on the side of his building and they had a ceremony and left a bunch of flowers and this is on the white side of town.

I've had black people here compliment my maga hat. A lot of black people here are not in agreement with these protests( riots).

Just like in Baltimore where I watched a few black men beat the sh1t out of some old white lady because a black man died at the hands of police that weren't white, the sheriff was black, the mayor was black, the prosecutor was black, but SOMEHOW its white peoples fault. This is why I condemn black lives matters, and it's obvious why condemn antifa.
That’s a cute attempt at reframe. Unfortunately, your caricature of BLM is simply false. The movement exists because of police violence.

As for antifa - it stands for anti-fascist. They are a far less centralized movement than BLM. If you have an issue with anti-fascism as an ideology, you are a supporter of fascism.
 

Lookatu

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jun 26, 2017
Messages
3,069
Reaction score
3,889
Age
53
I think most movements start out pure and with good intentions but eventually gets clouded with alternative agendas and a cover for other things. I've seen this throughout time again and again.
 

"Nervous Around Beautiful Women? There's a Rule for That"

I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.

The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.

Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.

Read more...

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
I think most movements start out pure and with good intentions but eventually gets clouded with alternative agendas and a cover for other things. I've seen this throughout time again and again.
They intentions are still good. The problem is people (especially in America’s social discourse) attach identities to ideology. We’ve had numerous threads on BLM. Most members agree with the BLM policy platform involving police reform yet disapprove of the movement. That’s cognitive dissonance. If I were to wager, if Trump decided to endorse police reform and call it something else, those same people who oppose BLM would flip and support those reforms.
 

Trez

Banned
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
473
Reaction score
226
Age
38
That’s a cute attempt at reframe. Unfortunately, your caricature of BLM is simply false. The movement exists because of police violence.

As for antifa - it stands for anti-fascist. They are a far less centralized movement than BLM. If you have an issue with anti-fascism as an ideology, you are a supporter of fascism.
The original premise of BLM is irrelevant. Intentions don't matter the results of the ideology and actions are what matter. How many BLMs protestors are even literate or have an objective understanding of history or morals?

They go ape sh1t ANY time a black person is killed or injured by a police officer whether its justified or not. If they cared about black lives they'd stop other black people from murdering black people, that kills a significantly larger amount of black people than anything but I guess black lives don't matter too them if the life is taken by another black.

Antifa and BLM destroys small businesses and there own community. Most of those people do not care about the alleged victims at all. They're going along with the Crowd and seeing opportunities to steal and and outlet for the discontent in their lives.

Oh and of course you're going to call me a fascist or Nazi, typical "everyone who disagrees with me is a nazi/fascist" typical. 1599666841799m.jpg 1599677486451.png

Sometimes I post satirical things but that gives you no right to make such accusations or feebly attempt to label me. Im one of the goods guy unlike you.

Antifa and blm are hateful towards whites and they are authoritarian. Both of them are a cancer.
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
The original premise of BLM is irrelevant.
That’s intellectual dishonesty. Sorry bro it doesn’t work that way.

Oh and of course you're going to call me a fascist or Nazi, typical "everyone who disagrees with me is a nazi/fascist" typical.
Opposition to anti-fascism is support of fascism. That’s simple logical deduction.
 

Trez

Banned
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
473
Reaction score
226
Age
38
That’s intellectual dishonesty. Sorry bro it doesn’t work that way.



Opposition to anti-fascism is support of fascism. That’s simple logical deduction.
George Zimmerman isn't white and Michael brown wasn't innocent. Neither was trayvon Martin, he attacked George Zimmerman. 1599544706225.jpg
 

"The Coffee Shop Girl You Never Spoke To"

You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.

For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.

Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.

The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.

Read more...

Trez

Banned
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
473
Reaction score
226
Age
38
Irrelevant.



Wrong. Neither of them lived to face their constitutionally protected right to due process.
In the George Zimmerman case, it was self defense. If someone puts their hands on you, you have a right to defend yourself. Michael brown grabbed the officers gun because he obviously intended to try and kill the officer or cause extreme bodily harm, the officer neutralized a threat.
 

EyeBRollin

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 18, 2015
Messages
10,536
Reaction score
8,536
Age
37
In the George Zimmerman case, it was self defense. If someone puts their hands on you, you have a right to defend yourself.
That case was morally defunct and only legally correct. Yes, you can legally defend yourself. Unfortunately, when the person claiming self defense sought out confrontation that argument doesn’t hold any moral credibility.

Michael brown grabbed the officers gun because he obviously intended to try and kill the officer or cause extreme bodily harm, the officer neutralized a threat.
A dead man doesn’t get his day in court. That narrative based on the officers account is heresay. Micheal Brown was neither guilty nor innocent.
 
Last edited:

Trez

Banned
Joined
Aug 3, 2020
Messages
473
Reaction score
226
Age
38
That case was morally defunct and only legally correct. Yes, you can legally defend yourself. Unfortunately, when the person claiming self defense sought out confrontation that argument doesn’t hold any moral credibility.



A dead man doesn’t get his day in court. That narrative based on the officers account is heresay. Micheal Brown was neither guilty nor innocent.
1599616477470.png
 

mrgoodstuff

Master Don Juan
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
17,582
Reaction score
11,942
Location
DFW, TX
Absolutely every video of police shooting out there shows the same thing

A) an inadequate guy who is under something
B) 5 or more cops pointing guns at him and telling him to lay down or get out
C) instead of grabbing him they expect him to comply
D) guy gets scared and does something dumb and they all unload into him

There is a very legitimate reason to behind those protests, believe it or not. I can see that reason.

The legal reason for those cops to waste a man is retarded. Somethings has to be changed.
Not true at all.. Theres even a vid of a man laying flat on his belly with handsup and he gets shot.
 

“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”

Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.

Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers.  Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.

I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.

Read more...

Top