Is seeing someone once a week even a relationship?

[Georgepithyou]

I want to know if you were in a relationship for this time frame now, would you be okay with only getting to see your GF once maybe twice a week???

I recently have started dating this girl I met from OLD, she lives about 40 minutes away from my small suburb.

We only have time to meet once a week due to work schedules, I'm just wondering is this lead even worth pursuing?

Has anyone been in a similar situation and if so how did you work it out?

 

[Romanemp22]

If you only up to sex, it's the best scenario. You don't have to look at her face 24/7.But if you like her and want to it to work, once maybe be not enough. Note it varies from person to person.

 

[Georgepithyou]

If you only up to sex, it's the best scenario. You don't have to look at her face 24/7.But if you like her and want to it to work, once maybe be not enough. Note it varies from person to person.

Sex only once a week wouldn't really work for me though, it might for some who are super busy

 

[Romanemp22]

Sex only once a week wouldn't really work for me though, it might for some who are super busy

I'm saying in terms she's one of your plates who you fvck from time to time

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Imho its best if you can hit 3-4 days a week. It shows you have ease of access and are y he preferred method of d1ck. But you all know how plates work better than me.

 

[Asseater]

As long as shes giving ***** every time you meet then keep her as a plate and nothing more. Relationship wouldnt go well most of the time in this situation imo.

 

[Georgepithyou]

Imho its best if you can hit 3-4 days a week. It shows you have ease of access and are y he preferred method of d1ck. But you all know how plates work better than me.

Ideally that is what i would have too, 3 to 4 days a week is good especially early on in the relationship, she's not willing to make the time so i will have to drop her.

As long as shes giving ***** every time you meet then keep her as a plate and nothing more. Relationship wouldnt go well most of the time in this situation imo.

That's all fine and good if you have other plates, until I grt to that stage I'm trying to see girls more regularly

 

[BMX]

Is me boxing once a week going to get me to pro status? Probably not.

 

[Desdinova]

It never worked for me because I was at risk of forgetting about her. I found it just wasn't enough time to do proper "relationship maintenance" to keep the attraction going, not just for her, but for me as well.

 

[Romanemp22]

That is why I avoid LDR. They simply don't work out.

I don't get people who just enjoy texting each other back and forth without seeing each other for months. I even avoid dating girls from one hour away town's yet to be in a ldr.

 

[DEEZEDBRAH]

I want to know if you were in a relationship for this time frame now, would you be okay with only getting to see your GF once maybe twice a week???

I recently have started dating this girl I met from OLD, she lives about 40 minutes away from my small suburb.

We only have time to meet once a week due to work schedules, I'm just wondering is this lead even worth pursuing?

Has anyone been in a similar situation and if so how did you work it out?

You said "We." do you actually mean we or her? I ask because this is not the same thing. As a practitioner of the hero's journey, on my purpose like Deida suggests in way of the superior man, i only have once a week to give. I am sourcing other girls. More importantly, I am on my path in life. Playing house isn't a good time. Its anti seduction. It works for me until it doesn't.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

Yes but very casual. 2-3 is the next step on that scale. If you are not into her enough don't see them anymore then that she will be lead on.

She is the sex holder
You are the relationship/attention holder.

I know thats basics 101 but thats a great thing to visit again and again.

To the guys she chase, HE is the sex holder .

 

[Who Dares Win]

If she doesnt demand attention via phone or media its great, where do I sign for that?