Interesting tinder experiment

[Jetleg]

http://www.tinderseduction.com/male-model-tinder-case-study/

I thought some of you younger DJ would find this intresting, this is the ultimate proof, that "creepy" for women is basically just a none-super-attractive guy hitting on them. i'm not suprised that they were after him, but how DESPERATE they were, its amazes me!

the title says a 10/10 male, i think he is good looking guy but def not 10/10.

Conclusion: tinder b1tches are h0es. maybe someone here try a direct approach and tell us if it was sucessful?

 

[fastlife]

From an objective standpoint, this 'experiment' doesn't hold much water: there's no record of overall matches or percentages. Of course, Germanlifter (or whoever he is) only selects the interactions that prove his point. Not to mention we don't know where he is and can't accurately gauge the SMVs of the girls he's messaging. Tinder game has also changed drastically in the past year--it's so mainstream that there are tons of AWs, shy girls that legitimately don't do hook ups, and girls looking for a SO on there (plus I'm in the south and here even the slvttiest girls tend to respond better to princess game).

So while this type of game can work you're basically screening for the most desperate, overtly DTF girls (typically 1-2 points below your Tinder SMV which is 3-4 points IRL) and alienating a much larger pool of girls you probably could **** running less direct game. Not to mention dealing with increased ASD and buyer's remorse before you even get the girl in person.

Looks-wise I'm comparable to the guy used in the 'case study' (my photo quality obviously isn't professional level). I can run this type of game on 6's and 7's and get my phone blown up with desperate, depraved messages. In the 8-9 range and the more quality 7's this type of message gets ignored, unmatched, or AW'ed with maybe maybe a legitimate lead every so often. Much easier to just be aloof and get them out for coffee or drinks before doing any real escalation--but even then it's not the cakewalk that a lot of guys would like to think it is.

 

[marmel75]

Most guys already knew that...nothing groundbreaking here...just kind of stating the obvious.

 

[thatfeel]

I would agree that there's nothing empirical or scientific about this "study". That being said, it doesn't deter from the fact that if you're a legit 10 you can pull this sh!t off. It's just not anything I or anyone else here should lose sleep over.

 

[JohnChops]

I started looking at it, saw BB.com MISC bull****, then closed my browser. Hate that subforum.

 

[marmel75]

I started looking at it, saw BB.com MISC bull****, then closed my browser. Hate that subforum.

Lol...Haven't been on the BB.com forums in years...buncha dudes that use gear that pretend they don't.

I'm on the EVO forums mostly. At least they keep it real over there...

 

[thatfeel]

Lol...Haven't been on the BB.com forums in years...buncha dudes that use gear that pretend they don't.

I'm on the EVO forums mostly. At least they keep it real over there...

The real question is, when you're on the internet, how would you ever know?

 

[JohnChops]

Lol...Haven't been on the BB.com forums in years...buncha dudes that use gear that pretend they don't.

I'm on the EVO forums mostly. At least they keep it real over there...

i dont go on forums anymore for bb/pling. everyone thinks they are an expert.

 

[marmel75]

i dont go on forums anymore for bb/pling. everyone thinks they are an expert.

I'm on there mostly for the gear knowledge...can never have too many legit places to order from...