You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
Educate these hoezSometimes you just have to let them know View attachment 1626
Tinder is for cowards who do not approach. Wait wit?Sometimes you just have to let them know View attachment 1626
Calling out other dudes who WILL post their interactions yet you shout all day long about your 'perfect tactics' to pick up/interact with women but have NEVER produced a field report....?Tinder is for cowards who do not approach. Wait wit?
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Not only do I post proof, walk the walk and talk the talk. Any guy who comes to Miami is welcome to come with me and get embarrassed in the field by how many hot women I will pull and close on. Enough saidCalling out other dudes who WILL post their interactions yet you shout all day long about your 'perfect tactics' to pick up/interact with women but have NEVER produced a field report....?
Who's the coward?
Wait wut??
I don't agree with this. I think Tinder and online dating in general is good practice for any man as long as his mindset is in the right place about it. But if he goes on there thinking he is going to find his next wife or GF then that's not the right mindset. I think doing the online thing will build confidence with women, help a guy learn their true nature, etc. So then a guy can be better at approaches in real life.Tinder is for cowards who do not approach. Wait wit?
Most men be it here or on other pickup forums cannot approach. Are delusional in believing online is game. Its passive dating. Assuming moving one's thumb is game is beyond retarded.I don't agree with this. I think Tinder and online dating in general is good practice for any man as long as his mindset is in the right place about it. But if he goes on there thinking he is going to find his next wife or GF then that's not the right mindset. I think doing the online thing will build confidence with women, help a guy learn their true nature, etc. So then a guy can be better at approaches in real life
To each their own. IMHO you would have a better close ratio dedicating oneself to reap life. I recall college girls with 1000s of matches. Meet none. Inflate ego and sense of entitlement. No ****, they're not 9s and 10s. Far from it. Online is low hanging fruit. Liberal women. Cratered SMV, single moms, fatties, war pigs, hogs, etc.As for me personally, I would say of all the women in my life I have dated, banged, etc. it's about 60% real life meets and 40% online meets. Hands down I can tell you that the better quality of women I have met of those two groups has been the ones I originally met in real life. My case specifically.
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
I suck at it because women don’t think I’m good looking enough to actually decide to meet me in real life over much better looking, younger, richer matches I have. So I’ll just say it’s trash and act like I don’t want to use it anywaysMost men be it here or on other pickup forums cannot approach. Are delusional in believing online is game. Its passive dating. Assuming moving one's thumb is game is beyond retarded.
RooshV just called out cucks on tinder in podcast #20. "Don't use it. Problem solved" was his two cents.
This coming from a guy in game for 17+ yrs.
I am around ten total in between life, relations, and before believing in monogamy once upon a time then versus now, 7yrs consistency alternatively.
IRL > online all day!
Online is begging for cucking.
Again, my **** won't suck itself. Swipe right @ life but, putting in work, chain gunning cold approach is GOAT status.
To each their own. IMHO you would have a better close ratio dedicating oneself to reap life. I recall college girls with 1000s of matches. Meet none. Inflate ego and sense of entitlement. No ****, they're not 9s and 10s. Far from it. Online is low hanging fruit. Liberal women. Cratered SMV, single moms, fatties, war pigs, hogs, etc.
Again, my **** won't suck itself. It is what it is Playboy. Just know your true north.
Anybody male thinking online is game has been pawned harddddddd by the feminine imperative.
I'll bump this after you get cucked. Too late.I suck at it because women don’t think I’m good looking enough to actually decide to meet me in real life over much better looking, younger, richer matches I have. So I’ll just say it’s trash and act like I don’t want to use it anyways
Online dating is actually bad practise. OLD is a world based on women's narrative and puts men in a complacent comfort zone - the end game is you lose.I don't agree with this. I think Tinder and online dating in general is good practice for any man as long as his mindset is in the right place about it. But if he goes on there thinking he is going to find his next wife or GF then that's not the right mindset. I think doing the online thing will build confidence with women, help a guy learn their true nature, etc. So then a guy can be better at approaches in real life.
As for me personally, I would say of all the women in my life I have dated, banged, etc. it's about 60% real life meets and 40% online meets. Hands down I can tell you that the better quality of women I have met of those two groups has been the ones I originally met in real life. My case specifically.
Provoking is good, it's a man's way of opening barriers.@logicallefty idk if you catch @DEEZEDBRAH posts but the majority of the time he's attempting to provoke
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.