"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

How to argue like a lawyer

Deep Dish

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 25, 2002
Messages
2,191
Reaction score
175
I came across a video on Youtube about how to argue like a lawyer.

The lawyer explained there are two kinds of argument styles that lawyers are taught, IRAC and CRAC.

With IRAC, you start by stating the Issue, then find the Rules, then do an Analysis with the facts, and end with your Conclusion.

With CRAC, you sandwich things together by starting with your Conclusion, then the Rules, and Analysis, and then your Conclusion.

IRAC is scholarly argument and CRAC is persuasive argument.

Apparently, IRAC is taught in first year law school, but CRAC is usually not taught until later.

I did not know about the persuasive style of artument.

I bring this up because, well, it's interesting, and knowing how to argue is an important skill to have as it's useful in daily life. Not every day, hopefully, but it comes in handy.

Here is a funny clip from Curb Your Enthusiasm.. Larry David finds out that his good lawyer is not Jewish. When he finds out his good lawyer is Swedish, he says, "I got a Swede lawyer?! She's going to get everything!" and storms out. Later in the episode, Larry fires his good lawyer for a bad lawyer and the wife ends up getting everything. The clip has nothing to do with IRAC or CRAC, it's just funny.

 
Last edited:

"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"

She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.

You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.

She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.

The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.

Read more...

Bible_Belt

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 27, 2005
Messages
17,576
Reaction score
6,359
Age
50
Location
midwestern cow field 40
I was taught irac as the way to write case briefs. It's also what they like to see in bar exam answers. Usually there are two rules, a majority rule and a minority one, and you work through it with each rule.
 

"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

Ricky

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 9, 2002
Messages
4,140
Reaction score
899
Age
52
How to split the difference
How to win an argument
Not sure if either really helps with women TBH
 

Divorced w 3

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Messages
3,887
Reaction score
2,554
Too many people enjoy arguing over trivial things, especially in relationships. Then they wonder why it devolves into toxicity.

Perhaps they should be more concerned with learning how to properly compromise than how to properly argue.
It’s like when you experience enough pain, you become motivated to find an alternative- arguing with your significant other or any relationship is the same way.

Opposite attorneys are called adversaries for a reason. The law is looking to convince some arbitrator to interpret or enforce a specific rule - personal relationships are almost never so black and white. Competition rarely breeds good will between adversaries. Relationships should not be adversarial.
 
Top