How many chicks have you slept with?

[p_1337]

Stopped counting around 100, but I'd say I'm around 180-200 at this point.

I'm in my early 30's and started to really get into 'game' around the time I was 22/23 years old.

 

[Baibars]

I had 5-10 and I’m 29. is that bad ?

 

[Bigpapa]

I had 5-10 and I’m 29. is that bad ?

Better than most active guys here for sure

 

[Baibars]

Laycount is nonsense, it's much more important what you learned from your relationships.

I learned a lot but also got hurt a lot. I’m a guy that learns through pain since my old man’s leather belt

 

[Aralius]

One. I'm in the middle of divorce now.

 

[needimprovement250]

One and a half, I say half because I only had oral with the second girl. The second one was over 3 years ago and nothing since.

 

[Mertz09]

35-40, most when I was in my 20s-30s and playing hard.

 

[ingridguerci94]

About 28, was married for a while so that took a chunk out of my DJ years.

 

[halfguard]

Lost count at 100. I'm 51.

That's not a flex by the way. I'd say 50% to 60% were sub 6's.

 

[halfguard]

I agree with everything you said.

I think a big thing in this community is the misconception that if they are lower value it sort of "doesn't count' because it's somewhat easier to game them. And in a sense it is. But like you said...you still have to display value enough for them to sleep with you.

We all know women highly over estimate their worth. So much so that the lesser value ones are actually harder to pull than higher value.

I work from coffee shops most days (I can work from anywhere) and I see and talk to all types of people coming in and out. You know how many 5s are cold to me (Even when I'm just making lame ass conversation)? Way more than solid 7's. It's hysterical and fascinating.

 

[Isildur1]

25 but ****ed things about with another 30 . If I had more competent game when I was younger I would probably be sitting at 50 now .

 

[Carmina Gadelica]

Lost exact count, but not as many as I'd like.

TO OTHER POSTERS: Did you ever hit a number of lays where you stopped improving and it became unsatisfying?

 

[Carmina Gadelica]

I had 5-10 and I’m 29. is that bad ?

The only bad part is that you lost count between 2 low numbers.
(Teasing you of course)

It's not ideal, I'll be honest. The ideal is double your age, minimum. No prostitutes (duh). Fatties count. Don't lay a demographic if they genuinely disgust you. There's 2 races I find extremely unattractive and shouldn't do, but they're both so easy for me. (I'm not racist, one of them is the same race as me)

 

[Carmina Gadelica]

Note: Quality over quantity. When I first got into the scene I only laid quality (or at least quality as in how good looking they were) and then the longer I was on forums I lowered my standards just so I could post lay reports. I've gotten over that validation seeking. My first lay, I was literally thinking about writing the lay report while I was ****ing her. That's how messed up my head was. Instead of being in the moment enjoying my first time having sex.

 

[Michael Chief]

I stopped counting when I was still in my 20s (I guess in both age and notch-count), but now I'm curious who number 100 was. hmmm

 

[FlexpertHamilton]

Fatties count.

Yeah no. I don't get this. If fatties and ugly girls can fluff your numbers then notch count is meaningless. Many guys can go out and fvck fat chicks and 5/10s all the time. The question of libido comes into play here too. If a guy has a high libido all the time, he'll want to fvck 4-6s more and so naturally he'll have a higher notch count.

I think a better gauge of a man's ability is how many attractive women he's been with and how long he can keep them (assuming he wants to).

 

[Pierce Manhammer]

The issue is that no one gets to say what’s attractive to a man except the man himself.

As I have said many times in the hot babe threads with pictures, what most men think are nines and tens I do not agree with. Not because my aesthetic standards are better, but because they are my aesthetic standards.

There are many black pill leaning men here that discount any man’s claims of getting laid more than they do, because they lead otherwise unremarkable lives when it comes to women and frankly aren’t getting late as much as they’d like to.

They’re not getting laid mostly because they have ridiculous standards that they will never be able to attain. So instead they become more bitter by the day and act like the proverbial crabs in a bucket.

“I cried for I had lost an FWB and only have 4 left, until I met a man who had NO FWBs.” -Pierce

 

[logicallefty]

I agree with @Pierce.Manhammer above. Not every guy has the exact same standard. Me personally, I like geeky looking white chicks and all kinds of non-white chicks. To pass my b0ner test They don’t have to be bean poles, but generally if they weigh almost as much as I do or more then I’m not attracted to them. But even with that, if a woman has a really crappy attitude that might push me away too. You can not disconnect the mouth from the cooter. Too bad you can’t sometimes lol

 

[BaronOfHair]

In the past week? One. My roofie dealer ended up in a dumpster with an entire clip in his chest, and I haven't yet found a new supplier

 

[FlirtLife]

The issue is that no one gets to say what’s attractive to a man except the man himself.

As I have said many times in the hot babe threads with pictures, what most men think are nines and tens I do not agree with. Not because my aesthetic standards are better, but because they are my aesthetic standards.

I've seen that myself, with a girl who was called below average in that thread. Owing to cosmetic surgery, she might look like one of two races. People can date or not date whatever race they like, so I decided not to put anyone on the spot. There are different standards of beauty, but also different perceptions of the exact same image.