She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
I don't know if you have been reading the actual testimony and know what the charges are, but the sex trafficking charge is pretty weak when everyone volunteered to be there. Nobody was forced to commit sexual acts. I don't see how that will stick unless more witness testimony shows otherwise. Most legal experts don't think it will either.Don't see how...pretty clear he did it and pretty clear everyone knows it, even his friends that didn't want anything to do with the parties and intentionally stayed away.
Well said brother andI don't know if you have been reading the actual testimony and know what the charges are, but the sex trafficking charge is pretty weak when everyone volunteered to be there. Nobody was forced to commit sexual acts. I don't see how that will stick unless more witness testimony shows otherwise. Most legal experts don't think it will either.
Cassie Ventura was typically the one who contacted the male prostitute to have sex. I'm not sure how that can be forced sex trafficking.
The racketeering charges have yet to be proven as well. You need an organization with multiple people that commit criminal activity. They might get him on the arson/molotov coktail and breaking and entering related deal against Kid Cudi if he hired someone to do it for him. Its not illegal to have someone in your organization buy baby oil so there is nothing there.
I think the prosecutors have stepped on their dihk's a little bit here.
Cassie Ventura has certainly been abused by him, but she was a willing participant. She has helped paint Diddy's character really well, but she hasn't helped the prosecutions case much in trying to prove sex trafficking.
You have a bunch of shady people doing shady things. Diddy got off on the control and power, the others got off on the money and fame. All a bunch of users. But not exactly some big criminal organization the fed's wanted everyone to believe.