She asks it casually, mid-sip. And you feel the floor open up, because the honest answer is work, gym, and a couple shows you're half-watching.
Women rarely say this out loud, but a man with a life is attractive before he says a word. The guy who spent Saturday deep-sea fishing and came back with photos and a story — he walks in already interesting.
The "22 Rules" pushed me to build a life worth talking about. Turns out the fastest way to be interesting to women is to be interested in your own life first.
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
I don't know if you have been reading the actual testimony and know what the charges are, but the sex trafficking charge is pretty weak when everyone volunteered to be there. Nobody was forced to commit sexual acts. I don't see how that will stick unless more witness testimony shows otherwise. Most legal experts don't think it will either.Don't see how...pretty clear he did it and pretty clear everyone knows it, even his friends that didn't want anything to do with the parties and intentionally stayed away.
Well said brother andI don't know if you have been reading the actual testimony and know what the charges are, but the sex trafficking charge is pretty weak when everyone volunteered to be there. Nobody was forced to commit sexual acts. I don't see how that will stick unless more witness testimony shows otherwise. Most legal experts don't think it will either.
Cassie Ventura was typically the one who contacted the male prostitute to have sex. I'm not sure how that can be forced sex trafficking.
The racketeering charges have yet to be proven as well. You need an organization with multiple people that commit criminal activity. They might get him on the arson/molotov coktail and breaking and entering related deal against Kid Cudi if he hired someone to do it for him. Its not illegal to have someone in your organization buy baby oil so there is nothing there.
I think the prosecutors have stepped on their dihk's a little bit here.
Cassie Ventura has certainly been abused by him, but she was a willing participant. She has helped paint Diddy's character really well, but she hasn't helped the prosecutions case much in trying to prove sex trafficking.
You have a bunch of shady people doing shady things. Diddy got off on the control and power, the others got off on the money and fame. All a bunch of users. But not exactly some big criminal organization the fed's wanted everyone to believe.