I view blue, red, and black pill as three different categories that together combined include most men. Some men fall in betweeen (purple pill, whatever red + black is) and some try to be something they're not (eg. simps).
My post about blackpill, for those unfamiliar:
https://www.sosuave.net/forum/threa...-of-exploiting-lonely-men.280614/post-3088390
Blue pill is for the naturally beautiful, upper / upper middle class men from stable families. Nothing needs to be taught to them directly. They've been raised well enough and are attractive enough to not have to worry about women.
Red pill is for upper middle / middle class men who needed a better direction. Some compensation is needed to raise their value. Blue pill advice didn't work for them, so they have to directly be taught how to interact with women and unlearn blue pill.
Black pill is for middle / lower classes. Since physical looks are so much more important today, blackpill aims to maximize looks and if that doesn't work, then it guides men out of the sexual marketplace to do something else.
Simps are lower class or unattractive men who try to mimic the upper classes with blue pill.
With some exceptions, life coach / influencer types addicted to "self improvement" (ie. endlessly preaching about exercising, eating your vegetables, willpower, and smiling) are usually depressed, lower class men trying to mimic red pill as a means of being seen as "successful." Not a dating advice forum, but check out the top posts in this
self improvment subreddit. They are literally congratulating each other for brushing their teeth, drinking water, and breathing properly. Yet, their language is very high energy and assertive.
Black pilled men tend to be younger zoomers, as their dating environment is drastically different than older generations, and it's today guaranteed that a significant amount of young men (15-30%) will end up with nothing regardless of effort. So it revolves around accepting being left out.
Red pill tends to expect exceptions to the rules to occur and then treats the exceptions as the rules (eg. "I know a guy who's short and unaatractive, but he has a hot girlfriend because he's a top 3% income earner. So being short doesn't matter.").
Upper class blue pill men are enormous hypocrites and have the lowest desire to help the lower classes. They are still the head of the house, the breadwinners, their wives don't work, etc. but they will preach equality and feminism since it's fashionable. "Just be yourself" works for them because they were raised well (good manners, discipline, career ambitions, etc.) and have good genes. They hate red + black pill since they see lower classes as "dirty" and "hateful" and cannot comprehend a life where "just be yourself" doesn't work.
Oversimplified, but:
Modern: "There is a set of advice that applies to everyone."
Postmodern: "There is
no set of advice that applies to everyone."
Metamodern: "There is no set of advice that applies to everyone, but everyone can find a set of advice that applies to them."
There's something for everyone. But you can't decouple the ideological basis of the advice from the social strata it came from. In short, there's no universal dating advice.