Dhoulmagus
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,695
- Reaction score
- 169
No, unless she was rich
When a woman says it, guys hear a confession. A heads-up. A scheduling conflict.
Here's the translation: I don't feel anything. Right now. With you.
Watch what happens when a man triggers actual attraction. The busy career, the recent breakup, the "not in a place to date" — all of it evaporates instantly. The same woman who was guarding her freedom is suddenly free every night.
The "22 Rules" explain why. When the right switches flip, her timeline rearranges itself around you.
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
I can relate and agree to this. I see it happening, there is always room for speculation though.62Telecaster said:It's complacency to me...there's something to be said about pushing yourself to constantly be more than what's expected.
For Gen-Y, I see only three categories of marriages that could actually end up truly working:
1)People who grew up together, experienced their lives together, and want to continue living together.
2)The unexplainable urge to be with someone that's felt from both sides equally...
3)People who share the same goals or priorities who can help each other achieve what they want.
...#s 1 and 3 are out for me, and #2 is the only thing that keeps the door open; I felt a little of this very briefly years ago, and it's something that you simply can't relate to unless you've been there yourself...I'm actually convinced that the average couple isn't even in the same stratosphere as #2, and that the average person doesn't know that particular feeling even exists or gets to experience it at all during their lifetime. It's a benchmark for sure to anybody who's been there.
The case for humans not being meant for monogamy is not any more convincing than monogamy itself from what I can tell. The problem in both cases seems to be the predetermination that you will behave in a certain way at some point in the future.PeasantPlayer said:humans are not meant to be monogamous
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
Great advice but any thoughts on banning this chick? You know, just sayin.nismo-4 said:F**k marriage!
As soon as the man says I do, she says I don't. And the woman you marry is not the same as the one you divorce.
I fear divorce because of all the losses a man can get. So I'm never getting married.
So many people just blindly go for it though...I don't think it's so much about shunning marriage as a no-win concept for men, as it is that modern society just needs to rethink things a bit and realize that the world has changed a lot. I'm 100% fine with living single if I never meet the right person..."marriage" itself will never make a person happy, it has to come from something uniquely tied directly to the two individuals for it to work.JohnChops said:I can relate and agree to this. I see it happening, there is always room for speculation though.
IMO, this is the only option I can see. I wrote on my blog about something called the "high score list". Essentially, women can only truly love men from her earliest dating encounters. When women are looking for "the one", this is when/where they need to look because they don't find any true deep satisfaction when they date later in life.62Telecaster said:For Gen-Y, I see only three categories of marriages that could actually end up truly working:
1)People who grew up together, experienced their lives together, and want to continue living together.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
Then comes the contrary that a woman who hasn't had her fulfillment of corks will continue to wonder the what-if's and almost go searching for it but a woman who's had her fair share of slotty years have a higher chance of understanding "it's all the same".Desdinova said:Marrying a woman who's had her fulfilment of c0ck in her earlier years will reduce your likeliness of becoming a significant part of her internal high score list.
Sure they appreciate men. A lot of men. They appreciate this man's c0ck, and that man's c0ck, and that other man's c0ck, and that man over there's c0ck, etc., etc. That's not a good reason to marry them, however.princess_124 said:Most girls I know, including me, do appreciate men.
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
This. Too bad its almost impossible to find a chick over 18 who hasn't lost her virginity yet though.stevo said:Then comes the contrary that a woman who hasn't had her fulfillment of corks will continue to wonder the what-if's and almost go searching for it but a woman who's had her fair share of slotty years have a higher chance of understanding "it's all the same".
Most impact is done when her virginity is taken, A woman who's in friendly terms with that first dude holds a stronger connection with him than what she might have with her spouse.
A woman who's in friendly terms with the first dude to fcuk her really well holds a stronger connection with him than what she might have with her spouse.
If you get lucky to be either of both dudes to a woman old enough (21 - 27), know the amount of power you have over her and consider keeping her.
We can only ban for breaking the rules and not for saying things we don't like.EvilSpirit22 said:Is it just me or are you all tired of her bull**** posts? Moderator please ban her. We don't want a girl penetrating our forum and having exactly opposite views about our way of living.