Dhoulmagus
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2013
- Messages
- 1,695
- Reaction score
- 169
No, unless she was rich
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
Attraction runs on a clock.
She flirted for weeks. Touched your arm. Found reasons to be alone with you. And you were careful. Respectful. Waiting for the right moment.
The moment had a shelf life. It expired around month two, and by the time you asked her out, she'd quietly filed you under "little brother."
One of the hardest lessons inside the 22 Rules: women rarely wait. Interest either grows or it decays, and nothing decays it faster than a man who never moves.
Make the move while she's still inventing reasons to be near you.
I can relate and agree to this. I see it happening, there is always room for speculation though.62Telecaster said:It's complacency to me...there's something to be said about pushing yourself to constantly be more than what's expected.
For Gen-Y, I see only three categories of marriages that could actually end up truly working:
1)People who grew up together, experienced their lives together, and want to continue living together.
2)The unexplainable urge to be with someone that's felt from both sides equally...
3)People who share the same goals or priorities who can help each other achieve what they want.
...#s 1 and 3 are out for me, and #2 is the only thing that keeps the door open; I felt a little of this very briefly years ago, and it's something that you simply can't relate to unless you've been there yourself...I'm actually convinced that the average couple isn't even in the same stratosphere as #2, and that the average person doesn't know that particular feeling even exists or gets to experience it at all during their lifetime. It's a benchmark for sure to anybody who's been there.
The case for humans not being meant for monogamy is not any more convincing than monogamy itself from what I can tell. The problem in both cases seems to be the predetermination that you will behave in a certain way at some point in the future.PeasantPlayer said:humans are not meant to be monogamous
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
Great advice but any thoughts on banning this chick? You know, just sayin.nismo-4 said:F**k marriage!
As soon as the man says I do, she says I don't. And the woman you marry is not the same as the one you divorce.
I fear divorce because of all the losses a man can get. So I'm never getting married.
So many people just blindly go for it though...I don't think it's so much about shunning marriage as a no-win concept for men, as it is that modern society just needs to rethink things a bit and realize that the world has changed a lot. I'm 100% fine with living single if I never meet the right person..."marriage" itself will never make a person happy, it has to come from something uniquely tied directly to the two individuals for it to work.JohnChops said:I can relate and agree to this. I see it happening, there is always room for speculation though.
IMO, this is the only option I can see. I wrote on my blog about something called the "high score list". Essentially, women can only truly love men from her earliest dating encounters. When women are looking for "the one", this is when/where they need to look because they don't find any true deep satisfaction when they date later in life.62Telecaster said:For Gen-Y, I see only three categories of marriages that could actually end up truly working:
1)People who grew up together, experienced their lives together, and want to continue living together.
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Then comes the contrary that a woman who hasn't had her fulfillment of corks will continue to wonder the what-if's and almost go searching for it but a woman who's had her fair share of slotty years have a higher chance of understanding "it's all the same".Desdinova said:Marrying a woman who's had her fulfilment of c0ck in her earlier years will reduce your likeliness of becoming a significant part of her internal high score list.
Sure they appreciate men. A lot of men. They appreciate this man's c0ck, and that man's c0ck, and that other man's c0ck, and that man over there's c0ck, etc., etc. That's not a good reason to marry them, however.princess_124 said:Most girls I know, including me, do appreciate men.
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
This. Too bad its almost impossible to find a chick over 18 who hasn't lost her virginity yet though.stevo said:Then comes the contrary that a woman who hasn't had her fulfillment of corks will continue to wonder the what-if's and almost go searching for it but a woman who's had her fair share of slotty years have a higher chance of understanding "it's all the same".
Most impact is done when her virginity is taken, A woman who's in friendly terms with that first dude holds a stronger connection with him than what she might have with her spouse.
A woman who's in friendly terms with the first dude to fcuk her really well holds a stronger connection with him than what she might have with her spouse.
If you get lucky to be either of both dudes to a woman old enough (21 - 27), know the amount of power you have over her and consider keeping her.
We can only ban for breaking the rules and not for saying things we don't like.EvilSpirit22 said:Is it just me or are you all tired of her bull**** posts? Moderator please ban her. We don't want a girl penetrating our forum and having exactly opposite views about our way of living.