Doc Love's the System works if you are a man looking for a relationship.... If you are NOT looking for a relationship his advice is limited. He is spot on about what women find attractive and what they respond to. Just about every dating and relationship coach out there uses elements of what he developed in the early 80s. Much of his stuff is dated since he's been doing this for 20 years, but the basic principles are the same.He is a fvcking pvssy. His mother should have swallowed him. Who agrees?
Did you know a woman can be totally UN-ATTRACTED to you...
And she'll still sleep with you?
If you've ever seen a girl go home with some asshole she didn't even LIKE, you know this is true.
But how is this possible?
Because deep inside her brain, sexual desire has nothing to do with what you LOOK like...
And everything to do with how you make her FEEL.
Matt Cook knows this all too well.
Matt is a nice guy... but he steals women from JERKS all the time.
In this free video training below, he'll show you how he does it:
Yes. I do agree.I used his books last decade and applied some of the principles. However, I would not recommend his book in today's MTGOW climate. I think we are post-friendzone, Nice Guy, and meeting girls and into some serious black-pill territory today. The last decade that had rosey coloured glasses that makes books like David Deangelo, Neil Strauss, Doc Love all revolutionary household names is gone.
The issue is that if a lady's interest level starts dipping once you tie the knot with her or are overly vested then you are in trouble. His book just works to help you surf the "Honeymoon" phase of a relationship better, but in real life, all relationships start to wear down over time. The person you divorce is never the same person you marry. A high interest level at any given moment is not a reliable indicator for the longevity of any relationship. I have had two ultra-high interest girls in the past where there was an eventual break-up or divorce and they were gone afterwards.
One thing where his book stands out is to see everything in terms of "interest-level" rather than trying to after-rationalize to protect your ego, and make an analogy to this to volume control. At the end of the day these books do not work and I regret every going there. Next time, if a lady has kids, or you see some obvious red-flags, RUN, don't worry about her demonic high interest-level, look at the soundness of the overall relationship. Making important relationship decisions by constantly gauging a lady's interest level, at a Honeymoon phase of a relationship is a recipe for disaster.
I’ve gathered that much.He listened to Docs Love advice and the girl he was in love with played him for a fool.
Are you coaching with him or listening to his material?I hate Doc Love's "one chance per girl per lifetime." That old fvck is trying to tell me that if I fvcked up once, it's over forever. Fvck that shyt. And corey wayne, don't label my behavior weak you bald phaggot. You don't know me, you don't know what goes through my head that causes me to make mistakes.
That’s not really true.I hate Doc Love's "one chance per girl per lifetime." That old fvck is trying to tell me that if I fvcked up once, it's over forever.
Ok so you believe that "if a woman's interest level falls below 51%, it's over forever." I'm gonna have a party the day I find out Doc Love has cancer.Doc Love saved my a*ss circa 2003. His cornerstone principles are still highly relevant today: Confidence--(Self) Control--Challenge. Interest level. The Dating Dictionary by Doc Love is still highly relevant.
Frankly, what motivates a woman to choose one man over another hasn't changed much in the past 10,000 years or so despite the internet, apps, and OLD.
David DeAngelo's Attraction is Not a Choice is still a classic and very relevant .
Technology (internet, apps, and OLD) has a long way to go to catch up to human evolution regarding how women are programmed.
Cheers and beers to Doc Love!!