ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
Senior Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2005
- Messages
- 237
- Reaction score
- 0
who's better?
Both. But like diablo said, read the DJ Bootcamp and there's also Weapons of Mass Seduction.Originally posted by ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
if AFC wants to be successful with women, should they go for which one more?
True. I've listened to that interview. It looks like David D. was a student of Ross Jeffries which is very cool in my opinion. We're all working together to improve our success with women.Originally posted by ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
because i was listening to david deangelo's interview with ross jeffries. They seem to be friends.
So damn true!Originally posted by Alpine
I used to think this forum was the dog's dangleys, but the more I learn from experience and the more threads I read I realise 80% of what people are saying here is complete disinformation.
As a newbie, you will take everything on face value 'cos you know no different. After a while you get to realise who's talking sh1te.
Originally posted by ROOKIE OF THE YEAR
who's better?
Nothing will replace field experience in the real world. Furthermore, you have be very cognitive of what you are doing in the field to figure out what works and what doesn't. If you use David Deangelo's ****y & Funny routine perfectly but you seem to be repelling every chick you come across, it may not be the failure of the ****y & Funny routine but something else that is causing you to repel every women you approach (ie. you smell like sh*t and they want to keep their distance from you).Originally posted by Alpine
How do you know anyones credentials? At least with De Angelo it's from a kosher source and it's one system. If you take a bit from one guy and a different philosophy from another they conflict and confuse.
Pick a thread, any thread. Read through the advice. I guarantee you will find two people offering advice that is the total opposite to the other. Which is right? They can't both be right, or can they?