Monogamy is natural only for as it takes for the kids to be raised. Pair bonding is a different thing entirely. I still have my birth blanket for example. I love that thing. Even if I don’t use it anymore (that **** is hella soft though). If you’ve had a friend for who’s been one since childhood, you’re not gonna just stop talking to them forever just because it’d be easier not to pick up the phone and call or whatever.
Hypergamy is real, yes. But that means that they only go after the best man, ONE AT A TIME. In other words, branch swing. That’s what monogamy is (serial monogamy anyway). Sure they banged hella dudes before that, but each time they were only with one man. What messes me up is how women can have multiple boyfriends or something like that or be a swinger or whatever the ****. I think they’re just mentally ****ed up at that point because I doubt she actually CARES about any one of the guys she bangs, or her main partner. Maybe she LIKES them all as people or even as attractive partners, but does not CARE about any one of them in particular. Like, I just can’t see some woman who is in an open relationship cooking a nice meal for her husband everyday, doting on him and the kids, and then still get gangbanged at the same time. I can only see a party girl who married some dude who’s okay with her still partying. And I just don’t believe that party chicks aren’t the caring and doting types. This is my issue SoSuave.
I can. I get over heartbreak easily too. When I was 15, I got over it in ~45 minutes when most guys would be upset for months and would likely never really be the same. At 16, I was around 6 minutes for the same thing. At 17, I gave no ****s for any amount of time. And I always feel hella good afterwards too, like an ‘I can do anything’ kinda high. I’m clearly not normal in this sense though, at least I don’t think so anyway.
Rape is the worst crime you can commit. Worse than murder. There’s a reason for that. It sticks with you for the rest of your life. Men don’t really get raped, and when it does happen it’s just overlooked. The only time it isn’t is if it is in prison, and that’s because it’s gay rape, not desired really by the victim. And even then it’s overlooked and you’ll never hear guys ever talking about it. And if it is a woman raping a man? Nature/society doesn’t really see a woman forcing a man’s **** inside of her as rape of the man.
OK Alan Watts
Yep, if they were abused in the past they’re more comfortable with continued abuse…
Okay that’s just emotional to everyone and everything. That’s not normal either.
Sort of. They will always attempt to secure better genetics where possible. But they will nest with one man, alpha ****s/beta bucks. This is the best genetics/safety of offspring dichotomy. It is a subconscious underpinning, not an overt conscious strategy. I think it's a misconception from the red pill that women don't care, it's just that like all relationships, it's conditional and not in the way society tends to portray it. As for the gangbang with a husband thing, I think it's a combination of a whole lot of things. Beta husband allowing free hypergamy, social pressure (yes, pressure) from feminism to explore sexuality and boundaries without thinking about the repercussions (they say without feeling shame, but that's not the issue), the entitled laziness of modern society and the conscious part of sex being fun.
How do you know it doesn't stick with men longer or less severely? The only men and women who can attest to the effects of being raped are the ones who actually were raped. And I would imagine that there is a lot of variation in how rape affects someone.
Hypergamy is one partner at a time. Yes they might have he beta who takes care of her and an alpha who she actually ****s, but you are missing the point.
Because I’ve heard some **** that you’ve never known was possible before. Women would have died from this stuff but the men survived. And you’d never guess that there’s anything wrong with hem unless you heard their story. One of the guys actually said that people shouldn’t make it into such a big deal and cry about it for years to come, that it gets to a point where you just gotta move on. That tough love stuff cannot come from a woman on a topic such as rape.
Fair enough. But it still doesn’t make sense when taking into consideration how women connect parts of their life together. That’s why initially I think they cannot. But perhaps I am wrong.The OP question is if women can have sex without feeling an emotional connection. Having sex and being raped are not the same when you consider the context, so I don't understand why rape is being factored into the discussion.
Remove this rape thoery which isn't accurate and doesn't relate to the original question and maybe it will make more sense
I agree that hypergamy can be one person at a time, even that it is best with one person at a time. All I'm saying is that multiple partners can also make sense when there are deficiencies. I'm not sure if that means monogamy is default, even if it's better. I'll have to think that over a bit more.
It is best with one person at a time and that is why we came to that as a society. Medieval times, they used to have only the powerful men bang anyone they wanted while the peasants and the servants were lucky to get one woman, which in a lot of cases was banged and knocked up from some powerful man anyways. A society full of bastard babies doesn't work.
In other words, they get more ****ed up. But this is what I’m saying though, it does affect them to have sex with others. As men, we can still bang 30 women in 3somes and crazy wild ways but still be alright with a chick who is always willing to try anything. This is why I’m questioning if they are able to separate emotions from sex, because that’s a sign of emotional damage right there.
They are not, man, I don't understand why is there 4 pages of debate needed on this one. After their 4th/5th ****, something in them breaks and they are just...never the same again.
