"The Kiss of Death Mistake"
You replay the conversation at 2 a.m. She texted back fast yesterday. Today, nothing. Was that smile friendly or flirty? What did the shoulder touch mean?
Every hour you spend decoding her signals drains your confidence and hands her the controls. Women can sense that insecurity from across the room — and it repels them.
One of the "22 Rules" kills the obsession on the spot: assume she likes you, and act accordingly. Sounds too simple. Works anyway.
Her interest tends to rise to meet your expectations. Psychologists call it a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Briffault's Law: The Most Important Thing You Can Know As A Man...
- Thread starter Mistic
- Start date
"Stop Asking Your Friends What to Text Her"
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
Love's Orphan
Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2012
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 0
Interesting video
BRIFFAULT’S LAW (or, why they are all effectively strippers):
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.
There are a few corollaries I would add:
1. Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
2. Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)
3. A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
.
.
So, let’s get to Korski’s question, “Who is a wh0re”, and my initial response, “They all are”. By Briffault’s Law if a woman is associating with you (assuming you are a man) then she is doing it because she sees some benefit, either current, or in the future, from that association.
http://outcastsuperstar.blogspot.com/2010/04/briffaults-law.html
The next time a woman asks "What are we?" the answer should be obvious: Mercenary and Auxillary.
Also consider the following quote from Machiavelli that says you can never be secure in a situation where you are paying, and you have a formal proof on why never to get married:
"Because this is to be asserted in general of (wo)men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by greatness or nobility of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon". (p 76-77 The Prince)
Still believe in marriage? Check this out.
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.
There are a few corollaries I would add:
1. Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
2. Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)
3. A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
.
.
So, let’s get to Korski’s question, “Who is a wh0re”, and my initial response, “They all are”. By Briffault’s Law if a woman is associating with you (assuming you are a man) then she is doing it because she sees some benefit, either current, or in the future, from that association.
http://outcastsuperstar.blogspot.com/2010/04/briffaults-law.html
The next time a woman asks "What are we?" the answer should be obvious: Mercenary and Auxillary.
Also consider the following quote from Machiavelli that says you can never be secure in a situation where you are paying, and you have a formal proof on why never to get married:
"Because this is to be asserted in general of (wo)men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by greatness or nobility of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon". (p 76-77 The Prince)
Still believe in marriage? Check this out.
Last edited:
Mantis Toboggan
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 859
- Reaction score
- 58
Mistic said:
Maybe these f**kin pvssies will pay attention to you this time, right? These damn f**kers.
"I just moved here from Florida."
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
Progress Report:
They say if you want to get rid of a scumbag it's easy: just lend them money and they will disappear.
So it occurred to me that we can deduce whether a person (in this case a woman) is a scumbag, simply by lending her money and seeing whether she disappears. For example, give her $100 and tell her to take you out to dinner next week. Then try to blow her off and see if she insists on going. I tried this and expected the worst, but she came through and to be honest I trust her for the first time now.
They say if you want to get rid of a scumbag it's easy: just lend them money and they will disappear.
So it occurred to me that we can deduce whether a person (in this case a woman) is a scumbag, simply by lending her money and seeing whether she disappears. For example, give her $100 and tell her to take you out to dinner next week. Then try to blow her off and see if she insists on going. I tried this and expected the worst, but she came through and to be honest I trust her for the first time now.