"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
Briffault's Law: The Most Important Thing You Can Know As A Man...
- Thread starter Mistic
- Start date
"You Can't Argue a Woman Into Liking You"
You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
Love's Orphan
Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2012
- Messages
- 123
- Reaction score
- 0
Interesting video
BRIFFAULT’S LAW (or, why they are all effectively strippers):
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.
There are a few corollaries I would add:
1. Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
2. Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)
3. A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
.
.
So, let’s get to Korski’s question, “Who is a wh0re”, and my initial response, “They all are”. By Briffault’s Law if a woman is associating with you (assuming you are a man) then she is doing it because she sees some benefit, either current, or in the future, from that association.
http://outcastsuperstar.blogspot.com/2010/04/briffaults-law.html
The next time a woman asks "What are we?" the answer should be obvious: Mercenary and Auxillary.
Also consider the following quote from Machiavelli that says you can never be secure in a situation where you are paying, and you have a formal proof on why never to get married:
"Because this is to be asserted in general of (wo)men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by greatness or nobility of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon". (p 76-77 The Prince)
Still believe in marriage? Check this out.
The female, not the male, determines all the conditions of the animal family. Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place.
There are a few corollaries I would add:
1. Past benefit provided by the male does not provide for continued or future association.
2. Any agreement where the male provides a current benefit in return for a promise of future association is null and void as soon as the male has provided the benefit (see corollary 1)
3. A promise of future benefit has limited influence on current/future association, with the influence inversely proportionate to the length of time until the benefit will be given and directly proportionate to the degree to which the female trusts the male (which is not bloody likely).
.
.
So, let’s get to Korski’s question, “Who is a wh0re”, and my initial response, “They all are”. By Briffault’s Law if a woman is associating with you (assuming you are a man) then she is doing it because she sees some benefit, either current, or in the future, from that association.
http://outcastsuperstar.blogspot.com/2010/04/briffaults-law.html
The next time a woman asks "What are we?" the answer should be obvious: Mercenary and Auxillary.
Also consider the following quote from Machiavelli that says you can never be secure in a situation where you are paying, and you have a formal proof on why never to get married:
"Because this is to be asserted in general of (wo)men, that they are ungrateful, fickle, false, cowardly, covetous, and as long as you succeed they are yours entirely; they will offer you their blood, property, life and children, as is said above, when the need is far distant; but when it approaches they turn against you. And that prince who, relying entirely on their promises, has neglected other precautions, is ruined; because friendships that are obtained by payments, and not by greatness or nobility of mind, may indeed be earned, but they are not secured, and in time of need cannot be relied upon". (p 76-77 The Prince)
Still believe in marriage? Check this out.
Last edited:
Mantis Toboggan
Master Don Juan
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 859
- Reaction score
- 58
Mistic said:
Maybe these f**kin pvssies will pay attention to you this time, right? These damn f**kers.
"She Made Her Decision Before You Finished Your Sentence"
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
Progress Report:
They say if you want to get rid of a scumbag it's easy: just lend them money and they will disappear.
So it occurred to me that we can deduce whether a person (in this case a woman) is a scumbag, simply by lending her money and seeing whether she disappears. For example, give her $100 and tell her to take you out to dinner next week. Then try to blow her off and see if she insists on going. I tried this and expected the worst, but she came through and to be honest I trust her for the first time now.
They say if you want to get rid of a scumbag it's easy: just lend them money and they will disappear.
So it occurred to me that we can deduce whether a person (in this case a woman) is a scumbag, simply by lending her money and seeing whether she disappears. For example, give her $100 and tell her to take you out to dinner next week. Then try to blow her off and see if she insists on going. I tried this and expected the worst, but she came through and to be honest I trust her for the first time now.