My morality has nothing to do with it. Taking part in ruining a childs home is wrong, especially when it's optional and you even have other women on tap. It's idle offense.
The woman tells you the children disliked their father. Hey, here's an idea; why don't you go and meet them, tell them who you are and what you were doing while their home fell apart. See what they say.
To your scenario, first of all my wife would not be unhappy. Let's assume she was for the sake of argument. I would listen to her and see the signs and fix what was wrong. Let's assume for the sake of argument I didn't.
Let's assume my marriage fell apart because my negligence led to her cheating. Yes, I would accept my part in it. I'd see what I'd done wrong. Frankly, if I found her out before she'd organised paperwork, I'd still want to sit down and fix it, no matter how unhappy I was with her infidelity or my stupidity, for my childrens sake.
Except this is all beside the point. You, for your part, would be a despicable man. Cut out all your feminine-logic crap about making my wife happy, it strikes me if you use that here, amongst men, you have spent too long thinking their way and gone native. Or you find it easier.
You would have chosen to be a participant in the breaking up of my family and the future unhappiness of my children. Perhaps it was inevitable, but you didn't have to take part, you could have left that to another homewrecker and not become one yourself.
I see clearly now that that consideration does not faze you one bit. You are not a noble man. You have no ideals, you resist even being introduced to them for fear of losing an opportunity you don't even need to take. You don't even need to take. You're a player who does not need to wreck a home to get some as he is wallowing in tail, yet does so anyway and grins while he does it and even believes he is doing the right thing.
An interesting insight into your psyche and the way you see and treat the world around you.
