"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"

You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.

And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.

Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.

The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.

Read more...

Balancing the need to lead and to be a challenge

SmoothTalker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
1,020
Reaction score
12
Location
Canada
Hey, just something I wanted to discuss.

We all know that its vital to always lead in relationships with women. However, we also know the benefits of being a challenge, and how sweet it is when she is the one chasing you.

But these two ideas are slightly conflicting. If you take the lead and pursue her, she is no longer chasing you.

If you stay a challenge and make her work for you, she has the initiative and is the one leading, to an extent.

What have you guys found to be the ideal balance?
 

"You Can't Argue a Woman Into Liking You"

You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.

She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.

Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.

Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.

Read more...

WC2

Master Don Juan
Joined
Mar 29, 2006
Messages
1,700
Reaction score
69
Location
New York City
These are two different concepts that work in harmony w/ each other in my opinion. You take the lead by showing her what it is that you want, but you STILL lead by letting her know you don't need it. Women DO want men who will confront them head on. Women DON'T want men who need women.

For instance, you see a woman out at the club who catches your eye. Without hesitation you take the lead and introduce yourself. You get to know each other for a few minutes, then tell her that it was nice meeting her and maybe you'll talk later. Effectively, you just showed her that you lead because you don't need her company the whole night. You have other things to do, places to be. But now at least she knows that theres some attraction between you and her. Hell, you just approached her and she doesn't have a goddamn clue who you are; shes thinking he must have some attraction towards me, but hes not really going out on a limb to get me in the sack- I should get to know him better so he does want to get me in the sack!

No, but really. Leading doesn't have to mean hanging on a woman. It simply means being confident in yourself and doing what it is you want to do.
 

SmoothTalker

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jul 22, 2003
Messages
1,020
Reaction score
12
Location
Canada
What you say makes sense. However I was not really thinking about the club approach context as much as with girls you know better. Specifically, for example there is a girl you have been going no contact on because of a previous issue, and now they are actively chasing you. You're considering giving them another chance but having them making the effort is working well so far, you don't want to lose that by changing your behaviour and suddenly trying to schedule a date with them.

Should you agree when they basically ask you out? I'd say yes, but then that's giving them the lead.
 
Top