article: Gen Z Is Leaving Dating Apps Behind

[Slowhandluke]

Like I said, he believed the Slavs were inferior. They proved him wrong. In the end he was inferior.

Ok, I don't want to be pedantic, but hitler did not lose because he thought Slavs were inferior. He lost because he didn't make the right decisions in war.

Many dictators/kings/Indian tribes/emperors/sultans/caliphs/etc. have mass slaughtered people in the past (committed genocide) and "gotten away with it". This does not mean what they thought about those people were right or wrong - that those people were "inferior" or "superior".. It doesn't matter. It just means these rulers had made the right decisions during their time in power to affect their desired outcome.

Does that mean I think Hitler was a "good person". No, he's clearly evil. However, he was so close to "getting away" with mass murder on the scale we have never seen before and he was on his way on subjugating basically a good portion of the worlds population. Reverse a few of his actions during WW2, and we would all be living in a radically different society now.

At the end of the day, in my opinion, his inability to retreat, go around huge obstacles, etc. was his downfall. It's like trying to bed a lesbian or a hardcore man hating feminist. A lot of time it is folly. "Try harder" - sometimes is not the answer.

 

[corrector]

Ok, I don't want to be pedantic, but hitler did not lose because he thought Slavs were inferior. He lost because he didn't make the right decisions in war.

Many dictators/kings/Indian tribes/emperors/sultans/caliphs/etc. have mass slaughtered people in the past (committed genocide) and "gotten away with it". This does not mean what they thought about those people were right or wrong - that those people were "inferior" or "superior".. It doesn't matter. It just means these rulers had made the right decisions during their time in power to affect their desired outcome.

Yes, but when the beliefs lead to insane decisions then it just becomes jokey.

At the end of the day, in my opinion, his inability to retreat, go around huge obstacles, etc. was his downfall. It's like trying to bed a lesbian or a hardcore man hating feminist. A lot of time it is folly. "Try harder" - sometimes is not the answer.

It is the answer in his mind because they were inferior.

It like the Daleks called "Pest Control" in this scene below.

Bad beliefs, bad decision, all one of the same thing.

You can only retreat if your enemy is not inferior and is an equal to you, right?

 

[Slowhandluke]

Bad beliefs, bad decision, all one of the same thing.

The Aztecs committed genocide to neighboring tribes throughout their history. They made the correct/good decision during the time of war with these tribes. Does this mean Aztecs belief that they were better than those tribes a "good" belief?

How about American colonist and the native Americans in the USA. A lot of these tribes almost got wiped out, some of them did. A lot of American colonist believed that the Indians were inferior and should be killed. Because the colonist made the right decisions in battle, does this make their belief, a "good" beliefs?

You can only retreat if your enemy is not inferior and is an equal to you, right?

Let me rephrase your sentence:

You can only retreat if your enemy is superior and is an equal to you, right?

Basically, according to the Art of War (IIRC), you should not fight a superior force. If you are equal, you should not fight also, because it will be a battle of attrition unless your forces can absorb the loses, but it's not ideal. You SHOULD fight your enemy when you have a plan and you know you will win. The biggest point of the Art of War, (at least what I got from it) is that you must look for weakness and exploit it (... and obviously, don't fight a superior force directly)

 

[corrector]

The Aztecs committed genocide to neighboring tribes throughout their history. They made the correct/good decision during the time of war with these tribes. Does this mean Aztecs belief that they were better than those tribes a "good" belief?

How about American colonist and the native Americans in the USA. A lot of these tribes almost got wiped out, some of them did. A lot of American colonist believed that the Indians were inferior and should be killed. Because the colonist made the right decisions in battle, does this make their belief, a "good" beliefs?




Let me rephrase your sentence:

You can only retreat if your enemy is superior and is an equal to you, right?

Basically, according to the Art of War (IIRC), you should not fight a superior force. If you are equal, you should not fight also, because it will be a battle of attrition unless your forces can absorb the loses, but it's not ideal. You SHOULD fight your enemy when you have a plan and you know you will win. The biggest point of the Art of War, (at least what I got from it) is that you must look for weakness and exploit it (... and obviously, don't fight a superior force directly)

Would the colonist have thought differently about the Natives if they had special photon laser weapons that zapped the colonists to ashes upon contact compared to their gun-powder? If they still thought htey were inferior after such a demonstration of power then they would be fools because they would be reduced to ash by their superior alien-tech fire-power if they still believed that way. That's a better analogy.

 

[Slowhandluke]

Would the colonist have thought differently about the Natives if they had special photon laser weapons that zapped the colonists to ashes upon contact compared to their gun-powder? If they still thought htey were inferior after such a demonstration of power then they would be fools because they would be reduced to ash by their superior alien-tech fire-power if they still believed that way. That's a better analogy.

I guess if the natives had laser weapons at the time, they would be the superior race... I mean, the Jews helped create the atomic weapon before anyone else did in 1945. Are they more superior than the slavs? I don't get this line of thinking.

All I'm saying is being "right in war" does not automatically mean your beliefs are "right" in other areas of life. some one can give the right answer to a math problem, this doesn't mean that person can not be a racist. Or giving the wrong answer, does it mean one is a racist.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

They are important I agree, but woman nowadays are way too low value to go out with someone with high Testosteron. Evolution failed woman’s insticts. Second they wouldn’t even be able to distinguish high Testosteron from low testosterone in some cases. You see the low testo guy being irrational and aggressive thinking they are oozing testosterone and some woman might feel he is a real men despite his actions coming from insecurities and in fact isn’t a real men but trying to bs everyone with his moody uncontrollable weak behaviours.

Woman are backwards, men are backwards, evolution failed humankind, people are getting more and more destructive over time, certain circumstances and situation globally reinforcing it.

These guys avoiding dating apps, are doing themself a favor. No sex Is better then losing self respect and pursuing low value woman on a low value dating app.

Self respect should be above that all, it means they have time and focus to other important things

This is patently false.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

It’s not, most woman are low value and hook up with average guys and losers. Guys who don’t care about their health or have any idea about health, these type of guys are common.

When I was skinny or fat, most woman would be sexually aggressive with their intent, I had more options because they knew they had a chance with me. As a muscular guy now, I have to do all the approach most of the time and make them feel they have a chance with me, some of them are intimidated or self select them out because I’m way out of their league

Yes, if you deal with low quality women then that's what you'll see.

This is simply an issue with your choices in women.

 

[Serenity]

Which idiot made this loser a mod? Seems like Intelligence and experience isnt required to be one.

That happens to be the owner of the forum. Would that mean he's also a loser by extension? Would that not mean this is a loser forum? What would it say about you for hanging out on such a forum?

It's fine to disagree, but please refrain from such unnecessary insults. If anything it only serves to make you appear less intelligent, having to resort to this instead of forming a decent argument.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Get outta here. I dont choose low value woman, it doesnt change the fact that there are more low value People then high value People.

Which idiot made this loser a mod? Seems like Intelligence and experience isnt required to be one.

Well that touched a nerve. Usually because someone got a dose of bitter truth they didn't want to swallow from my experience.

Take your medicine son, it's good for you

 

[corrector]

I have a good healthy and respectful relationship with a great woman and I know many People will have a hard time to find and build the same degree of a good relationship with a woman. Im also thankful for my family and my friends.

Its pretty evident for me, maybe not for the others that you are a Narcissist.

You are providing for her?

 

[Doctor Europeo]

Page 6 of this thread has no mentions of "Gen Z" or "Dating Apps". I think I can close this thread in good conscience.