I can't see any reason to think the mean and median wouldn't yield the same result here. We arbitrarily set the scale from 0 to 10, so if beauty is normally distributed, we'll find the mean and median will be the same. (In fact, so will the mode.)Do you define average as mean or median? Most frequently occuring in the wild, or halfway between best and worst?
The majority of chicks would fall between 4 and 6, and a greater majority, probably like 85%, from 3 to 7. Seriously ugly and seriously good lookng are both rare encounters.
This is taking into account both face and body. However, real results will be slighly skewed from the above because to truly rate a 10 she needs a certain level of height, too. Also, obesity is a big problem in western countries -- among both the beautiful and the ugly -- so many facial 8s find themselves demoted to something like 3s because of their bodies. (Yes, young girls are aware that fat isn't attractive, but results show that they aren't having that much success avoiding stacking it on.)
Uh, yeah, okay buddy. Just how many 10s have you actually MET? (Not just seen, actually spoken to -- for long enough to be able to guage their personalities?)And yes, I'd go for one of these down-to-earth average girls over an HB10 b1tch any day. The HB10s aren't all b1tchy, but they're usually not particularly interesting either. A lot of above-average-looking girls take advantage of their beauty and just maintain BORING personalities.
Personally, I won't compromise on looks. I don't need a 10 (thank God!), but I've got to find her "hot". Personalities, in my experience, don't really vary all that much. If you're an "in control" kinda guy, YOUR personality should color the relationship a lot more than hers, anyway. So, as long as she isn't unbearable, personality doesn't factor into it that much for me. (Of course, you do get the occasional standout personalities, but they are pretty rare -- 5-10% of the time, maybe, and probably the lower end of that.)