100% calibration with women - Buying Temperature

[tksniper]

Women are often seen as fickle in romance. But they are not. It’s more like guys are oblivious to a woman’s buying temperature. A woman’s buying temperature has to be at 80%+ before you can attempt it to escalate the interaction.

Only the best salesmen in the world and the best seducers in the world are totally in tune with the buying temperature of their targets.

Most people are completely miscalibrated.

Here are some of examples of miscalibration:

1- You attempt to approach a woman and she’s just nice to you out of social reflex. You attempt to escalate and get rejected.

2- You approach a woman and she’s interested but you fail to escalate.

Both of these guys are clueless to a woman’s being temperature.

The only time you can escalate is when her buying temperature is 80%+. And vice versa. If her buying temperature is over 80% and you don’t escalate, she will deem you as not used to attractive women and will catergorize you as a non fvckabke guy. And if her buying temperature is below 80% and you try to escalate, you will come across as a creep.

Whenever I approach a woman, I know instantly what her buying temperature is. I would know if it’s workable or a long shot.

If you remove your ego and projections, a woman’s buying temperature is always crystal clear, right in front of your face.

 

[BaronOfHair]

@tksniper "Both of these guys are clueless to a woman’s being temperature"

A problem who's remedy is only a Walgren's away. All a fella need do is

-Purchase a baby thermometer

-Keep said thermometer and petroleum jelly on him at all times

-Instruct any and every gal who catches his eye to drop trow, bend over, and spread 'dem cheeks wider than The Grand Canyon

Simultaneously, you'll be gauging her readiness to submit, with a strong degree of accuracy

 

[Bingo-Player]

Problem is some women genuinely enjoy playing games and they will also fein interest in exchange for attention

 

[Bigpapa]

Problem is some women genuinely enjoy playing games and they will also fein interest in exchange for attention

Though long term yields better results to assume attraction and escalate compliance , rather than having second thoughts if she is actually interested or just in for the attention

usually compliance will give you a good indication of where you stand on this spectrum

 

[Bingo-Player]

Though long term yields better results to assume attraction and escalate compliance , rather than having second thoughts if she is actually interested or just in for the attention

usually compliance will give you a good indication of where you stand on this spectrum

Yea agreed thats usually the basis I work on

 

[BillyPilgrim]

Though long term yields better results to assume attraction and escalate compliance , rather than having second thoughts if she is actually interested or just in for the attention

usually compliance will give you a good indication of where you stand on this spectrum

Yea agreed thats usually the basis I work on

Compliance alone isn't enough, you also need to incorporate touching using an escalation ladder to make sure she is physically receptive without hang-ups

 

[Barrister]

Not saying you are wrong OP -- because there are plenty of times this is correct. But make no mistake, plenty of women are "fickle" with romance and just fickle people in general. I will go a step further, and say they are downright histrionic when it comes to all things -- not just romance.

Yes, there are many men who have zero clue how to read a woman's body language or her tone of voice and fail to understand what is happening. But women certainly are just as, if not more, guilty of the problems with being validation wh*res and sending mixed signals in general. It goes both ways.

 

[tksniper]

Not saying you are wrong OP -- because there are plenty of times this is correct. But make no mistake, plenty of women are "fickle" with romance and just fickle people in general. I will go a step further, and say they are downright histrionic when it comes to all things -- not just romance.

Yes, there are many men who have zero clue how to read a woman's body language or her tone of voice and fail to understand what is happening. But women certainly are just as, if not more, guilty of the problems with being validation wh*res and sending mixed signals in general. It goes both ways.

I think you are mistaking a woman’s social conditioning vs her buying temperature. A woman can feel attraction towards you and show it in her body language but her social conditioning would cause her to play it safe and play hard to get.

Once you get over the whole “buying temperature” level of calibration, you would run into another obstacle. Attaction is a woman’s interest in you v.s her social conditioning. You his is when trust comes to play.

But most guys aren’t calibrate so they either assume the woman isn’t attracted so they try harder. Or they try to escalate without trust.

The equation is simple and universal. It exists in both sales and seduction. Attraction + trust = escalation/close.

So I guess the next big question is how do you create trust?