The fall of Russel brand !!

[eli77]

Quite the ride from hot comedian to sexual predator !!

 

[BaronOfHair]

And not nearly as entertaining as The Fall Of Max Payne

 

[BillyPilgrim]

I don't think this will be good for his brand

 

[eli77]

And not nearly as entertaining as The Fall Of Max Payne

may payne?

 

[BackInTheGame78]

And not nearly as entertaining as The Fall Of Max Payne

Nor as grim as the fall of Fortunato in The Cask of Amontillado.

 

[BaronOfHair]

Nor as grim as the fall of Fortunate in The Cask of Amontillado.

To say nothing of The Fall Of The Foot Clan

 

[characternote]

10 and a half years. Ouch. He'll be out in about 6.5

 

[BaronOfHair]

10 and a half years. Ouch. He'll be out in about 6.5

For his sake

Let's hope so

 

[Identikit_Radiohead]

David Walliams next.

 

[characternote]

David Walliams next.

Brand used to tease Walliams on his show to be pretending to be gay in order to get girls lol (get them when their guards are down)

although, everyone always knew about Walliams and his liking for young girls


2004 Facebook

 

[Identikit_Radiohead]

Brand used to tease Walliams on his show to be pretending to be gay in order to get girls lol (get them when their guards are down)

although, everyone always knew about Walliams and his liking for young girls


2004 Facebook

He's next to go down.

Meanwhile the first lady of France, Brigitte Macron, met Emmanuel Macron when he was 15, she was 39 and his teacher.

Different cultures and different views on what is pedophilia/what isn't I guess

Macron is married to Brigitte Trogneux.[375] She is his former La Providence High School teacher and is close to 25 years his senior.[376][377][378] They met during a theatre workshop that she was giving when she was a 39-year-old teacher and he was a 15-year-old student and classmate of her daughter.[379][380][381] A romantic relationship started later, and his parents attempted to separate the couple by sending him away to Paris to finish the final year of his schooling, as they felt his youth made this relationship inappropriate.[16][381] (The age of consent in France is 15.) The couple reunited after Macron graduated and were married in 2007.

 

[characternote]

He's next to go down.

I watched the 'expose' on him a minute ago
(it was also a similar 'expose' that got the wheels turning for the Russell brand thing, so we'll see if people 'come forward' now like that did with Brand)

Won't know anything until IF other girls come forward and with more serious allegations, but from the program it seems that other than some potential 'grooming' (messaging underage gilrs, so under 16) the program mostly concentrate, and make a big deal about him trying too (and sometimes succeeding) in sleeping with lots of young, legal women

But I found myself thinking 'That's not a crime? That's just the way of the world!! Everyone knows that 'fame' is powerful and that men with fame will basically ALL 'exploit' that fame to get laid! I imagine there's probably not a 'famous' person out there who didn't do that lol. It's a bit like being angry at a good looking man for 'expoiting' his good looks to sleep with women?!

We'll see what happens, though. If it follows the same Brand pattern after his TV expose, other girls will now come forward, and depending on the claims, a police investigation will begin

My only 'suggestion' at this point, in terms of UK law, is to work out a way of classifying 'celebrity' under the same rules we have for other 'positions of authority' such as police officers and teachers and social workers, whereby the age of consent becomes 18 instead of 16.

Different cultures and different views on what is pedophilia/what isn't I guess

A 'pedo' has always basically mean someone who goes after VERY young/pre pubescent girls to me. Think 9 year olds or whatever
It always annoys me when everyone says 'pedo!!' under like a facebook post of an older man trying to flirt with a 19 year old or whatever lol. Here he would likely be called a 'pedo' for banging a 16 year old, BUT it's legal! If I could be bothered, i'd ask them people 'so by your logic, the UK law allows pedophillia?'. lol

 

[Identikit_Radiohead]

A 'pedo' has always basically mean someone who goes after VERY young/pre pubescent girls to me. Think 9 year olds or whatever
It always annoys me when everyone says 'pedo!!' under like a facebook post of an older man trying to flirt with a 19 year old or whatever lol. Here he would likely be called a 'pedo' for banging a 16 year old, BUT it's legal! If I could be bothered, i'd ask them people 'so by your logic, the UK law allows pedophillia?'. lol

There's young British men in their 20's being physically attacked by small gangs of young Gen Z males for having 16-20yo girlfriends.

These Gen Z males have been brainwashed to believe teenagers are "children", even 20-21yo women. Age of consent is 16 here in UK.

They have become rabid violent animals. Its a lost cause.

Also... stuff like this below is rife and everyday reading on our Newspapers. Can't even take you're own daughter out alone as a man without paranoid pricks. Make sure her mum is with you at all times, guys. JFL.

Father mistaken for a paedophile after booking a hotel room with his 14-year-old daughter

‘One minute I was brushing my teeth, the next I was being told I was a paedophile,’ says Karl Pollard

www.independent.co.uk

 

[zekko]

After hearing a bit more of this, it sounds like he was convicted basically in a "his word against hers" situation that goes back 17 years, with some accompanying testimony about pattern of behavior. Sounds like she was willingly involved in sexual relationship, but that he took it further than she wanted (some backdoor stuff). It also sounds like the press sat on the story until he started to turn more right wing on his podcasts. Another assault supposedly alleges that he touched a girl's boob in a bar. I guess the Me Too era isn't over, at least not in Britain.

Mind you, if he penetrated her backside against her will, I certainly don't condone it, but it's still his word against hers. Why does her word carry more weight? And why did it take so long for charges?

 

[Identikit_Radiohead]

Mind you, if he penetrated her backside against her will, I certainly don't condone it, but it's still his word against hers. Why does her word carry more weight? And why did it take so long for charges?

Because these women are old hags now and their lives went nowhere. So they'll blame the high status Chad from yesteryear who they consenwwually ****ed for "ruining them".

Chads out there need to be aware, and for god sake wear a head camera when ****ing Becky's off tinder, picked up from bars, holiday venues, drunken office parties etc. She might want it up her backdoor donut at the time, but 17, 20, 25 years later she changed her mind it was vape.

 

[characternote]

There's young British men in their 20's being physically attacked by small gangs of young Gen Z males for having 16-20yo girlfriends.

These Gen Z males have been brainwashed to believe teenagers are "children", even 20-21yo women. Age of consent is 16 here in UK.

They have become rabid violent animals. Its a lost cause.

Also... stuff like this below is rife and everyday reading on our Newspapers. Can't even take you're own daughter out alone as a man without paranoid pricks. Make sure her mum is with you at all times, guys. JFL.

Father mistaken for a paedophile after booking a hotel room with his 14-year-old daughter

‘One minute I was brushing my teeth, the next I was being told I was a paedophile,’ says Karl Pollard

www.independent.co.uk

yes, in recent years the UK has become a bit brainwashed and americanised when it comes to this stuff,.

When I was a bit younger it was normal to see HUGE age gaps. I don't mind admitting that i've had some myself! (I slept with a gorgeous 17 year old when I was in my 30's or so for example who I met in a bar for a one night stand). And I would see similar age gaps everyday in my last year of school when the girls would be picked up in cars by their much much older boyfriends in their cars, IN FRONT of the teachers who didn't even raise an eyebrow since it just wasn't an issue in them days. People had teh view that it's legal and that's it. Keep your nose out of it

But now it's changed a lot in recent years. For one thing, young people do'nt even know the laws in their own country. Every day on facebook or something i see someone accuse someone of being a nonce because he said 'she's cute' about a video of a 16 year old girl dancing, coming from a 25 year old guy or whatever. They say 'age of consent is 18 for you because you are are older!!' They seem to think they are in America!? They don't know the laws of their own countries. Very common

There was that guy who got murdered recently for tying to get the number of a 16 year old girl in a bowling alley or something. She gave it to him, and then later her and her friends murdered him for being a 'p3do'! (all went to prison of course, but they felt justified and got a LOT of support in the UK from peple who felt they done the right thing, despite his actions being perfectly legal)

And arguing with them people was just pointless. Simply too stupid/brain dead to use logic against.

 

[Identikit_Radiohead]

There was that guy who got murdered recently for tying to get the number of a 16 year old girl in a bowling alley or something. She gave it to him, and then later her and her friends murdered him for being a 'p3do'! (all went to prison of course, but they felt justified and got a LOT of support in the UK from peple who felt they done the right thing, despite his actions being perfectly legal)

And arguing with them people was just pointless. Simply too stupid/brain dead to use logic against.

this?

Teens sentenced over Alexander Cashford beach death in Sheppey

Alexander Cashford was attacked on a Kent beach by three teenagers who thought he was a paedophile.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Gamisch]

After hearing a bit more of this, it sounds like he was convicted basically in a "his word against hers" situation that goes back 17 years, with some accompanying testimony about pattern of behavior. Sounds like she was willingly involved in sexual relationship, but that he took it further than she wanted (some backdoor stuff). It also sounds like the press sat on the story until he started to turn more right wing on his podcasts. Another assault supposedly alleges that he touched a girl's boob in a bar. I guess the Me Too era isn't over, at least not in Britain.

Mind you, if he penetrated her backside against her will, I certainly don't condone it, but it's still his word against hers. Why does her word carry more weight? And why did it take so long for charges?

Well..unlike the US the UK has judges that studied law and thus make a " professional " decision. Russel did NOT got judged by a " jury of his peers "( aka a bunch of soccer moms how go by feelz, pms bad day ect and put you away for life while having no background in law whatsoever)

So we can shyte in the western system and all that good stuff, but we can also assume that they've thoroughly researched the case and concluded he was in the wrong...

There will never be a waterproof system that pleases everyone. So I rather go by this . Professionals who studied law for over a century and worked in lawe for more than 2 decades making such decisions.

 

[zekko]

There will never be a waterproof system that pleases everyone. So I rather go by this . Professionals who studied law for over a century and worked in lawe for more than 2 decades making such decisions.

Sounds to me like the system is that if you are accused, then you are guilty.

 

[Westminster]

Well..unlike the US the UK has judges that studied law and thus make a " professional " decision. Russel did NOT got judged by a " jury of his peers "( aka a bunch of soccer moms how go by feelz, pms bad day ect and put you away for life while having no background in law whatsoever)

So we can shyte in the western system and all that good stuff, but we can also assume that they've thoroughly researched the case and concluded he was in the wrong...

There will never be a waterproof system that pleases everyone. So I rather go by this . Professionals who studied law for over a century and worked in lawe for more than 2 decades making such decisions.

So miscarriages of justice never happen. Ever.