Why are men shamed for using escorts/hookers? Isnt that the ultimate dread if a guy has used them?

[Fruitbat]

Many men whom their wife catches fcking another girl rejuvenates her attraction for her husband because he hasnt become a pethetic pot bellied loser that took himself out of the game. Not saying do it but it happens. Have experienced it myself and seen multiple examples.
Its a RP creed bro

Does this work if I get caught jacking off to other women?

 

[tightsocks]

So in your opinion the average 20 yrs hottie you see at the club would rather get railed from elon musk than a random fitness model?

Is this a serious question?

 

[AureliusMaximus]

Why are men shamed for using escorts/hookers?

Nope. It's just way below my standards. Why pay for something you can easily get free?

Paying for it would be like a defeat and sort of loser kind of thing.

 

[Serenity]

Paying for it would be like a defeat and sort of loser kind of thing.

This is exactly it! Women also want a man most would consider of value, a man paying for sex displays he is of such low value that he basically bribes a woman to fvck him. A man who is of high value is desirable for a woman to fvck, even higher value and he may get the woman to pay if he demands it.

I keep saying that leaning on dread as a strategy is ill advised. Making a woman feel like she won the lottery is so much more powerful and that by itself would make her dread losing you, without any additional effort trying to induce dread.

The key is to make her dread losing you by being of so high value she knows other women would want to throw themselves at him or even pay to fvck him. As such, a man paying to fvck a prostitute is the furthest away from being that high value man as he can possibly get.

 

[AureliusMaximus]

This is exactly it! Women also want a man most would consider of value, a man paying for sex displays he is of such low value that he basically bribes a woman to fvck him. A man who is of high value is desirable for a woman to fvck, even higher value and he may get the woman to pay if he demands it.

I keep saying that leaning on dread as a strategy is ill advised. Making a woman feel like she won the lottery is so much more powerful and that by itself would make her dread losing you, without any additional effort trying to induce dread.

The key is to make her dread losing you by being of so high value she knows other women would want to throw themselves at him or even pay to fvck him. As such, a man paying to fvck a prostitute is the furthest away from being that high value man as he can possibly get.

Indeed.
I know I am a man of high value/SMV (and chicks know it too), and I have no problem getting women and it for free.
So why would I ever devalue myself?

 

[Serenity]

So why would I ever devalue myself?

You wouldn't, but I've seen this idea of dread game come up from time to time and apparently they will.

I see the argument OP is making as being born out of a negative thought pattern and focus on the negative. Dread is just a small part of their motivation to stay loyal to a man, but if she's not strongly drawn to him for positive reasons then there is no game to speak of. Give her something very positive and she will naturally be afraid to lose it, that's how dread actually works. It's a passive effect, a byproduct of simply being great which is the effect of what a man actively does.

By focusing on inducing dread a man is completely missing the target, it ONLY works if she ALREADY holds him in high regard and that by itself induces the dread. So dread is pointless to actively focus on, putting the focus on the positive will lead to natural dread and so much more.

Dread is nothing more than a psychological fun fact, it's not even functionally useful to be aware of it and if anything awareness of it may cause one to sabotage oneself more by trying to apply it actively. We should focus on the other end of it, what makes a guy irresistible to a woman? Therein lies the real useful advice.

 

[DonJuanjr]

We should focus on the other end of it, what makes a guy irresistible to a woman?

How about not being her husband for one.

 

[AureliusMaximus]

Again I agree @Serenity
Dread games = silly games for the unsecure little bois.

She enters your frame and will be afraid to lose access it if you are of high value, (Where not talking money here). No need to play silly games.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

If you don’t follow the “women are pure as the driven snow and can do no wrong” mantra then you are a “woman hater”.

I mean darn their treachery and betrayal were mentioned in the Bible.

 

[AureliusMaximus]

their treachery and betrayal were mentioned in the Bible

It is mentioned to some point/degree. I'm just not the religious type, so I do not know to the tee the details.

 

[Who Dares Win]

Is this a serious question?

Its a simple question, do you believe elon musk and scott cook gets in a club and wome thirst over elon musk?

Actually she wants both. Elon for her provider and the other one for the second half of her strategy.

Yes agree but what matter is who bangs her and make her think about him not who pays her bills as her father was used to.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

How about not being her husband for one.

Being someone else's husband

 

[zinc4]

This is exactly it! Women also want a man most would consider of value, a man paying for sex displays he is of such low value that he basically bribes a woman to fvck him. A man who is of high value is desirable for a woman to fvck, even higher value and he may get the woman to pay if he demands it.

I keep saying that leaning on dread as a strategy is ill advised. Making a woman feel like she won the lottery is so much more powerful and that by itself would make her dread losing you, without any additional effort trying to induce dread.

The key is to make her dread losing you by being of so high value she knows other women would want to throw themselves at him or even pay to fvck him. As such, a man paying to fvck a prostitute is the furthest away from being that high value man as he can possibly get.

Not true at all unless it's a man who has no other options except prostitutes. Most of the biggest celebrities, professional athletes and politicians get pros frequently and they can get any women they want. One word: convenience.

 

[DonJuanjr]

Most of the biggest celebrities, professional athletes and politicians get pros frequently and they can get any women they want. One word: convenience.

Eddie Murphy being one example.

 

[Serenity]

Not true at all unless it's a man who has no other options except prostitutes. Most of the biggest celebrities, professional athletes and politicians get pros frequently and they can get any women they want. One word: convenience.

Most men are not celebrities with more money than they can possibly spend, not comparable.

 

[BadBoy89]

Agree, I realized myself its too late for me to have a happy family.

Those things work when the guy is below 30 and she is below 25, thats when they are both "fresh and receptive", free from baggage and can bond while sharing life experiences together in sensitive years.

But why do you want a family in the West? When the powers that be give women power, education, sexual freedom, and encourage all men to be subservient to women, and women are encouraged to divorce and destroy men if they are not happy, there is no reason to get married. It's a sham.

The only thing is having a baby. But you don't need marriage for that, just got find a girl who is stable and doesn't have a kid. That's the tricky part.

But to each his own, some guys want a family, some guys don't.

 

[corrector]

I mean darn their treachery and betrayal were mentioned in the Bible.

What are you talking about?

 

[B80]

Its a simple question, do you believe elon musk and scott cook gets in a club and wome thirst over elon musk?


Yes agree but what matter is who bangs her and make her think about him not who pays her bills as her father was used to.

I imagine both would get female attention, musk would get more though.

 

[mrgoodstuff]

What are you talking about?

Bathsheba, eve, Sammons wife there are many others.

 

[corrector]

Bathsheba, eve, Sammons wife there are many others.

Bathsheba was innocent. She was basically raped by King David. You can't say a woman is beautiful, a man plots to sleep with her and murder her husband, and then blame the woman for that.

Samson's married an enemy woman/ Philistine, and he disobeyed God's laws rather than marry another Israelite. The message is not about Delilah being treacherous, but about Sampson putting himself in a bad situation that wasn't necessary. It's not a general issue about women.

By the way, I personally would not be rooting for either David or Sampson. Both of them have no issues finding any woman. David had many different wives and didn't have to go with Bathsheba like that. God spared His life because He was genuinely repentant for what he did and sorry for what he did. Sampson also had limitless physical strength and could get with any woman he wanted to. He didn't settle for Delilah because of a lack of options. He had plenty of options but chose to be stupid by dealing with that woman and then sharing his secrets to her.

However, go on...what other examples do you have? Remember, in the Bible context, you didn't have feminism or matriarchy, so the man is more responsible for the choices that he is making and the outcomes that flow from that.