Hello Friend,

If this is your first visit to SoSuave, I would advise you to START HERE.

It will be the most efficient use of your time.

And you will learn everything you need to know to become a huge success with women.

Thank you for visiting and have a great day!

Youtube short that sums up todays' dating market

M

member160292

Guest
If women remained ‘traditional’ we would not see technology and innovation today that we have today.
Sorry fellas, I’m not going back to dial-up porn
 

The Duke

Master Don Juan
Joined
Feb 4, 2008
Messages
5,249
Reaction score
7,632
Age
47
When I am crapping, I am focused on the task of crapping. I don't recall ever swiping while crapping.
I'd hate to get hung up on a swipe and forget to wipe. Something not right with Cornhole.
 

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
2,853
Reaction score
2,189
Age
29
Location
Nashville, TN
Y’all must be the poop and go poopers. During work hours, <5% of the time on the toilet is pooping and the rest is sitting and phone browsing.
 

kavi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2022
Messages
726
Reaction score
624
Age
39
If they are only doing half the work than that's a 50 aka a fail or losing grade. I don't care how normal these guys look. They can't talk to women and they are too lazy to get off the PS5/computer and do anything about it.



The fact is that these men were hard working bread winners and household managers that had to suddenly put down whatever they were doing to fight for their country across the planet. Idk how you can confidently say that our lives today is similar or more difficult than our forefathers. Your grandad didn't have time to be having an argument on the internet at 1pm during the work week lol.



Dude this is literally a cake walk compared to even what the boomer had to go through growing up.



Sure, but have you been forcefully drafted to fight in any of these wars? The Boomers didn't have a choice when they were forcefully sent to some Jungle hell in Vietnam.



This point I do agree with you and if millennials do not get the same assistance from the government like our previous generations then this country will be screwed later down the road.
Lols at Boomers.

Boomer men would get anhiliated in todays dating market with modern women literally destroyed.

Boomers are failures they all trusted governments, the system, they didnt question anything, they trusted capitalism, hated communism, literally evrything they were told they believed and followed it was such an easy life for them. Fortunately these boomers are still alive and hopefully will remain so until they see the order they believed in so much collapse.

Boomers is like noughts and crosses and modern life is like 4d chess
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
12,238
Reaction score
10,497
Boomer men would get anhiliated in todays dating market with modern women literally destroyed.
Boomer women in 1965-1980 didn't have lists of dream boyfriends that looked like what I've linked below. Boomer women didn't demand what this late Millennial/early Gen Z woman is demanding. Average Boomer males in 1965-1980 had a fighting chance. Average Millennial men in 2010-present are being sent to the rejection pile. This is why both @sangheilios and I have acknowledged the difference between Boomer men of average SMV as younger adults who had a chance to have more stable and extended relationships as compared to Millennial men of average SMV who are more likely to be incel or borderline incel.

Yes, the young Boomer men of 1965-1980 would get destroyed today if they were young adults in today's market competing for women with the types of demands seen below.

 

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
2,853
Reaction score
2,189
Age
29
Location
Nashville, TN
Boomer women in 1965-1980 didn't have lists of dream boyfriends that looked like what I've linked below. Boomer women didn't demand what this late Millennial/early Gen Z woman is demanding. Average Boomer males in 1965-1980 had a fighting chance. Average Millennial men in 2010-present are being sent to the rejection pile. This is why both @sangheilios and I have acknowledged the difference between Boomer men of average SMV as younger adults who had a chance to have more stable and extended relationships as compared to Millennial men of average SMV who are more likely to be incel or borderline incel.

Disagree, your hippie woodstock Chad is no different than the ones slaying today. Did you not watch Forest Gump haha? Jennie fvcked the whole country going to Forrest who could've easily turned black pilled today. Didn't groupies describe boomer women that would sneak backstage and get fvcked by performers. Anecdotally, my grandad had 10 confirmed kids and cucked a lot of fathers in his hometown. Like @Bigpapa said, the world has always been shvt lol.

1685709373905.png
 
Last edited:

kavi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2022
Messages
726
Reaction score
624
Age
39
Hardly any boomers were hippies, most were seriously blue pilled normies, work a job make some money be like every other guy. Those women had low standards compared to todays women and they were less confident and troublesome. Modern women are seriously a different kettle of fish of compared to boomer women.

Look what happened to Bill Gates with his wife and she is a boomer woman with values and **** lol. Replace her with a modern Millenial Woman with all her mindf****s and headgames and enjoyment of destruction, hatred of men, using her beauty and sexuality to maximum effect then imagine what a hot young millenial woman on a mission can do to some boomer like Bill Gates its like he gets eaten alive.
 

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
2,853
Reaction score
2,189
Age
29
Location
Nashville, TN
Hardly any boomers were hippies, most were seriously blue pilled normies, work a job make some money be like every other guy. Those women had low standards compared to todays women and they were less confident and troublesome. Modern women are seriously a different kettle of fish of compared to boomer women.
Most guys are blue pilled normies today. I don't see how you can just ignore the obvious hypergamy that went on during the boomer days and say they loved blue pilled men lol. This is a major case of Rose Colered glasses syndrome.
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
12,238
Reaction score
10,497
This was hysterical.

Didn't groupies describe boomer women that would sneak backstage and get fvcked by performers.
In the 1970s and 1980s, there were Boomer women who were groupies for the top rock bands of the era. By the late 1980s, you would have been getting into early Gen X'er groupies (1965-1969 births).

The 25 year old Boomer groupie in 1980 was more of a niche female than a mainstream female in 1980. The typical 25 year old woman in 1980 was already married.

Did you not watch Forest Gump haha? Jennie fvcked the whole country going to Forrest who could've easily turned black pilled today.
1685712508891.png

According to Jenny Gump's tombstone in that movie, she was born in 1945. That would put her at the tail end of the Silent Generation. A 1945 birth year would have been close enough to the early Boomers born in 1946-1947.

The character of Forrest Gump was an extreme beta male. If you Google "Forrest Gump beta male", there are websites and Reddit discussions of it.

Then, there's this...


Hardly any boomers were hippies, most were seriously blue pilled normies, work a job make some money be like every other guy. Those women had low standards compared to todays women and they were less confident and troublesome. Modern women are seriously a different kettle of fish of compared to boomer women.
The typical Boomer was not at Woodstock. When Woodstock happened, the typical Boomer was under 18 and unable to get out from their parents' authority. Additionally, Woodstock was held in upstate New York, about 100 miles from New York City. Boomer young adults (ages 18-23) from the Northeast could go there. If you were a 14 year old Boomer in Texas in 1969, you weren't going to Woodstock.

I agree that the typical Boomer wasn't a Woodstock attendee or a hippie in general. Most were some sort of blue pill normie.

The typical Boomer female had lower expectations and was less entitled than this woman.


Look what happened to Bill Gates with his wife and she is a boomer woman with values and **** lol. Replace her with a modern Millenial Woman with all her mindf****s and headgames and enjoyment of destruction, hatred of men, using her beauty and sexuality to maximum effect then imagine what a hot young millenial woman on a mission can do to some boomer like Bill Gates its like he gets eaten alive.
Melinda French in the late 1980s was a typical careerist Boomer female then, with an elitist Duke University MBA. Melinda French was born in 1964, so she's at the tail end of the Boomer generation. She's almost a Gen X'er.

Melinda French at Microsoft in the late 1980s has evolved into Alissa Heinerscheid (former VP of Marketing for Bud Light at Anheuser-Busch InBev) and Elizabeth Hitch (Sr. Director of Marketing - Miller Lite North America at Molson Coors). Now Heinerscheid and Hitch used their elitist MBA to get marketing jobs to make anti-male ads for Bud Light and Miller Lite.

Most guys are blue pilled normies today. I don't see how you can just ignore the obvious hypergamy that went on during the boomer days and say they loved blue pilled men lol. This is a major case of Rose Colered glasses syndrome.
I think the average Boomer woman was more receptive to a blue pill man during the 1970s-1980s as compared to the average Millennial and now Gen Z woman of the 2010s-early 2020s. Boomer women during the 1970s-1980s didn't have the abundance of male prospects that a Millennial female has had in the 2010s-2020s. Your typical Millennial on a swipe app in the last decade has had more options in her swipe queue + her Instagram DMs than either Christie Brinkley or Elle MacPherson (Boomer supermodels) would have had during the 1980s. Brinkley and MacPherson had to go outside and field approaches during the 1980s. I'm sure there were some guys who tried to contact their modeling agencies for dates with them during the 1980s, but that paled in comparison to guys sending DMs to ordinary woman on Instagram. If it is the 1980s and you're a regular beta male dude trying to get a date with Brinkley or MacPherson, are you going to write a letter, stuff it in an envelope, put postage on it, find a mailbox, and send it? Also, at the modeling agency, some random lower paid female secretary was going to read the note and screen it first. That's a lot more effort than sending a DM on Instagram now, which creates more abundance for women.
 

kavi

Master Don Juan
Joined
Jan 2, 2022
Messages
726
Reaction score
624
Age
39
In Boomer times 'Game' didnt exist especially not for women. Modern women know about female Game whereas Boomer women were straightforward, the biggest difference is Game.

Modern women really only care about Game. Even these memes about women saying they want this and that 6ft guy good looking rich etc really they just want Game.

But Game can be ****ed up but it is deeply rooted in ego and really fun so it really drives women. This is why women care so much about Game.

Then all we have to understand regarding the difference between Boomer culture and modern culture is that in Boomer times the concept of Game didnt exist. But nowadays 'Game' is a concept all Millenials have some concept of. All modern relationships are about Game and by that I dont mean being a player or a narcissist it is much deeper than that.
 

CornbreadFed

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 7, 2023
Messages
2,853
Reaction score
2,189
Age
29
Location
Nashville, TN
I think the average Boomer woman was more receptive to a blue pill man during the 1970s-1980s as compared to the average Millennial and now Gen Z woman of the 2010s-early 2020s. Boomer women during the 1970s-1980s didn't have the abundance of male prospects that a Millennial female has had in the 2010s-2020s. Your typical Millennial on a swipe app in the last decade has had more options in her swipe queue + her Instagram DMs than either Christie Brinkley or Elle MacPherson (Boomer supermodels) would have had during the 1980s. Brinkley and MacPherson had to go outside and field approaches during the 1980s. I'm sure there were some guys who tried to contact their modeling agencies for dates with them during the 1980s, but that paled in comparison to guys sending DMs to ordinary woman on Instagram. If it is the 1980s and you're a regular beta male dude trying to get a date with Brinkley or MacPherson, are you going to write a letter, stuff it in an envelope, put postage on it, find a mailbox, and send it? Also, at the modeling agency, some random lower paid female secretary was going to read the note and screen it first. That's a lot more effort than sending a DM on Instagram now, which creates more abundance for women.
Maybe more so for economic sustainability, but once women became economically stronger, the receptiveness faded rapidly.

In Boomer times 'Game' didnt exist especially not for women. Modern women know about female Game whereas Boomer women were straightforward, the biggest difference is Game.

Modern women really only care about Game. Even these memes about women saying they want this and that 6ft guy good looking rich etc really they just want Game.

But Game can be ****ed up but it is deeply rooted in ego and really fun so it really drives women. This is why women care so much about Game.

Then all we have to understand regarding the difference between Boomer culture and modern culture is that in Boomer times the concept of Game didnt exist. But nowadays 'Game' is a concept all Millenials have some concept of. All modern relationships are about Game and by that I dont mean being a player or a narcissist it is much deeper than that.
Game has always existed, especially in the African American community. The Milk Man or Mailman's son didn't come from no where.
 

SW15

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 31, 2020
Messages
12,238
Reaction score
10,497
Maybe more so for economic sustainability, but once women became economically stronger, the receptiveness faded rapidly.
Fewer Boomer women had bachelor's degrees, let alone an advanced degree. If you were an economically viable Boomer man in 1970s, your bachelor's degree was likely impressive to women who were more likely to have either a high school diploma or an associate degree.

A Millennial man with a bachelor's degree right now is not impressive and means almost nothing. Also, that Millennial man with a bachelor's degree has seen his bachelor's degree get so watered down that his bachelor's degree means less for him getting strong employment options. Also, the Millennial man typically had to take on more debt to get his bachelor's degree. The Millennial women also are more likely to have bachelor's degrees and they're able to earn comparable wages if not more than the bachelor's degree holding Millennial man.

Women became more economically viable with Gen X women (1965-1980 births). That's really where the independent, don't need a man female became more mainstream, and then it got fully ingrained with Millennial women. The Boomer women that did go to college and did get careers were some of the earlier adopters of the feminist and careerist path.

Millennial women don't need a provider male as a romantic partner. Money can impress a Millennial woman, but a man today needs more of it (in inflation adjusted terms) to have the same effect it would have had on a Boomer female in 1970-1979 because Millennial women are far more economically strong.
 

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
10,520
Reaction score
4,340
This short popped up into my youtube feed the other day and it filled me up with laughter lol. While it's impossible to specifically quantify, the point that the guy made was that in previous generations the average man had to put in substantially less work in order to acquire a woman that was substantially better quality than what would be realistically obtainable today. The term "Hoflation", which I love, sums it up perfectly.

Also, just lol at her face, dumb stupid hoe. When 2/3 of young men are single this just shows how out of touch many women are.

You could have a good job, be fit and respectable and you'd be lucky to get a date with a woman who is not a single mom or obese.

She Has NO IDEA About The Average Male Experience - YouTube
The guy with the beard mogs me.
 

MatureDJ

Master Don Juan
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Messages
10,520
Reaction score
4,340
The women who the broke, tattooed deadbeat guys are fuccking are often cashiers at Walmart, Dollar General, McDonald's, and Burger King. These aren't great women either. Careerist women aren't typically fuccking the broke, deadbeat guy working at a scrap yard, cooking meals at Denny's, or working construction.
Neither are ugly women fuccking these blue-collar guys.

 

corrector

Master Don Juan
Joined
Oct 12, 2009
Messages
9,078
Reaction score
3,460
Jbw and get Asian gf. Or is that a problem too with that "market"?
 

Bigpapa

Master Don Juan
Joined
Nov 17, 2020
Messages
3,195
Reaction score
2,497
Age
124
Disagree, your hippie woodstock Chad is no different than the ones slaying today. Did you not watch Forest Gump haha? Jennie fvcked the whole country going to Forrest who could've easily turned black pilled today. Didn't groupies describe boomer women that would sneak backstage and get fvcked by performers. Anecdotally, my grandad had 10 confirmed kids and cucked a lot of fathers in his hometown. Like @Bigpapa said, the world has always been shvt lol.

View attachment 10335
It is funny how when I showed them actual facts about marriages ( their “golden era” and what it is today ) no one said anything anymore about this

Now everyone talks about how women “valued” different things and that they were not hoeing around, and how the normie had a better chance bla bla bla

IMG_2267.png IMG_2266.png IMG_2265.png
 

Gamisch

Master Don Juan
Joined
May 2, 2022
Messages
3,064
Reaction score
3,837
@CornbreadFed

Man, you really don't understand what is being discussed here.

If you think 2/3 young men are losers you are completely out of touch with the reality of the modern dating world. Again, are some of the men in this category legitimately losers, sure, but the majority of them are going to just be ordinary and normal men. Also, do you ever consider that 1/3 of the men that are NOT in that category could also be losers? There are plenty of men in relationships that have nothing going for them, they just got lucky and had things line up for them.

You also are really out of touch with the lives men had in previous generations. Post WW2 America an average man would have been able to support a family on his own income. Many factory jobs had incredible benefits, such as pensions, etc. and overall paid quite well. They weren't working 20 hours a day for sure. This started to change in the 1970s, which is when we started seeing a shift away from this lifestyle and more to what we recognize in recent decades. The average man in the U.S during the post WW2 boom of the late 40s through the 60s did not have to put in as much work in order to find a woman who he could potentially marry and have children with. I'm going to completely disregard your comment about the Korean and Vietnam wars because they have no real relevance to the broader dating market.

The average baby boomer male, born in the late 40s through early 60s, did not struggle in the dating market. It was UNUSUAL to be a man in this bracket and not get married and later have children. The men in this category did not work 20 hours per day and would have had something akin to the 9-5 grind that is still a thing in our society. The average man in this category was also able to become a home owner, which is something that is not the case for the current younger generations. The boomer generation though were the first to see divorce as a quite common phenomenon, though this is due to a change in cultural attitudes related to marriage and family.

The Millennials and early Gen Zers are in a very different set of circumstances than what their parents and grandparents would have had. This generation has been incredibly unlucky in many ways, which I'll elaborate on. First, in my areas of the country many in this age bracket were socially pressured into going to college, which during the 90s and on had become a huge money making scam. Many were saddled with quite impressive amounts of debt, well into the 5 figures and even more was incredibly common. They also became young adults in a time period of stagnation but with incredible increases in the cost of living, particularly housing. Then you have the 2008 financial crisis, which the U.S. never really recovered from, and later the COVID lockdowns. Overall, during their prime years Millennials lived in a time of incredible economic uncertainty and distress.

I'll also add that the U.S had been involved in sort of bull**** war or occupation from 2001 and until the withdrawal from Afghanistan in 2021.

I'm going to tie this together in case I lost you. The average Millennial has had to put in far more work in order to have the same lifestyle as that of their parents, this goes for both men and women. They had to take on much more student debt to get a degree than what their parents may have had to. Becoming a home owner is substantially harder, perhaps even impossible for many living in certain areas, something that was a given for their parents. Is all of this stuff impossible, no, it's just that you have to be much tighter on your game than what was required of previous generations. This means making really good financial decisions, very careful decisions with college, career choices, etc.

One huge difference between recent times and what the previous generations experienced is the competition you will face due to social media and dating apps. Before the advent of these technologies, women dated men they had some sort of proximity or contact with. They didn't have access to literally dozens or even hundreds of men at a given time at their fingertips. This technology provides women with an incredible abundance of choices, so naturally the response is to be increasingly more selective. This can eventually get to the point where an otherwise normal man could go months without a date, in fact he'd be lucky to get one at all. I think you and many of the other posters on this site severely underestimate how bad the dating market is for the majority of the men. Like with what I mentioned previously about needing to be really tight on your financial/economic game to get by, this also applies to the dating world as well. A man needs to be much tighter with his "game" than what would have been required of men of his father's and grandfather's generations.
Regarding the first sentence that 2/3 of men are losers; its ironic how especially the manosphere will say 95 out of a 100 women are trash. Now you could argue that the RP is the on the most extreme side of the spectrum. Still , as usual the point is clear; a man will consider most women as trash as time will teach him.

So why wouldn't a woman think like this as well? Ask a 35 y.o single woman what she thinks of men. In that regard 2/3 isn't as bad. And what defines a man as "normal"? A job, a car and a house? Hitting the gym ? Most men don't do "manly " things anymore , just facts. That's why this whole badboy shyte hit blown outta proportions. Because instinctively women want "real men".

Dont forget that men sympathize with each other easy. E.g. We think a friendly dude with a good job defines as good relationship material , women obviously need more.
I more than likely matched with my current gf of a year while taking a coffee work shvt. This is easy as it gets lol.
Yeah , these kinds of " reviews " make men believe it is that easy. But you must be aware that for whatever reason you caught one at the right moment. Timing is always essential with women. But in order to have a successful relationship out of OLD you MUST find one that's hasn't been using OLD too long. You gotta snatch her of the market before she discovers the OLD D1ck carousel. Just facts.

On top of that ,my personal issue is I hardly ever match with a woman I can really take seriously. Hence my 95/5 comment. Takes TONS of effort to hypothetically date a 20 women just to like and stick with one..perhaps you were satisfied with less than you are able to get? Or you're just a lucky mf..
 
Top