jhonny9546
Master Don Juan
It's a long thing, but I hope worth reading for you.
Desdinova has done an incredible job explaining how women think emotionally about men.
In short, the best thing a man can do is give her maximum emotional low's and high's. That's like crafting an imprinting for her.
This is why many women, after encountering manipulative, narcissistic, or sociopathic men, will never recover, and will truly be damaged (the perennial oneitis).
But if you want to become a mature man (after your DJ phase), You'll have other goals in life that don't depend on the control women have over our lives, or on the things we did before to please women.
For all of us, once we're past 30 or 40, life truly has different priorities, also because we've had experiences that have changed us, so we've to update our filters through which we view reality.
The entire theory is describing a man that has the most "emotional" power over her.
That's usually a lover, not someone she's with for an LTR...but, if that happen to be the case?
I bet you could actually spot those specific LTRs (trauma bonding, highs and lows, war/separation and peace/reconciliation).
Have you ever wondered who has more "emotional power" over a woman?
That guy who behaves in an unhealthy way or who has behavioral or personality problems will make her experience intense emotions, both negative and positive. In this case, women speak for themselves about who they are.
If you see them chasing this type of man, you've already understood that that specific woman is no longer edible material. She's indigestible. She no longer has value for you or your future. Go next.
Now if Desdi's theory were 100% applicable to all women, it would have truly uncovered something very important:
The dynamics of the relationship, whether it be toxic or healthy, is not an indicator of its health. The only indicator of a relationship's health is whether that woman has oneitis for the man she's with (in that LTR), how much that man has penetrated her emotionally and left a lasting mark, while still living it togheter.
This is the case in many relationships where the woman constantly complains about her "lazy man", or calls him an "4sshxle", or that she works too hard and "has to be a mother" for him, or that she always complain about something...etc, etc, etc....
but... Why doesn't she just leave? ...
Because He is her emotional weakness.
Her perennial oneitis.
Once a relationship, an LTR, like this is formed, those ones, are absolutely not a good example to follow.
Then, after, You add that she has settled down with the "boring man".
Well, as a mature man, now, you really want to experience the second relationship... the "boring one".
We men are truly interested in having special emotional moments, craft them, but if you're truly mature men, what you seek most is the long-term stability of that emotional fluctuation. You want as little of it as possible.
I don't understand how this could be a problem.
Your job as a man is to find a woman who isn't emotionally damaged by a guy from her past, but also not to be a manipulative man who has that power over her emotions. An emotionally healthy woman can detach herself and choose. But given the theory, it seems like this isn't possible.
Now, let's look at some points that need to be explained or expanded upon, regarding the theory.
(I know that ******* is not an insult, but it's not coming from a healthy woman mind).
I've also noticed, that what you write is based on only one woman, so it's a somewhat small sample size to work with, and say that this works like that for "any" woman out there. Are we basing this on a woman who was healthy and emotionally secure or the contrary?
This isn't to discredit your theory, Desdinova; you've done an incredible job. I just wanted to add some perspective, clarify things.
Desdinova has done an incredible job explaining how women think emotionally about men.
In short, the best thing a man can do is give her maximum emotional low's and high's. That's like crafting an imprinting for her.
This is why many women, after encountering manipulative, narcissistic, or sociopathic men, will never recover, and will truly be damaged (the perennial oneitis).
But if you want to become a mature man (after your DJ phase), You'll have other goals in life that don't depend on the control women have over our lives, or on the things we did before to please women.
For all of us, once we're past 30 or 40, life truly has different priorities, also because we've had experiences that have changed us, so we've to update our filters through which we view reality.
The entire theory is describing a man that has the most "emotional" power over her.
That's usually a lover, not someone she's with for an LTR...but, if that happen to be the case?
I bet you could actually spot those specific LTRs (trauma bonding, highs and lows, war/separation and peace/reconciliation).
Have you ever wondered who has more "emotional power" over a woman?
That guy who behaves in an unhealthy way or who has behavioral or personality problems will make her experience intense emotions, both negative and positive. In this case, women speak for themselves about who they are.
If you see them chasing this type of man, you've already understood that that specific woman is no longer edible material. She's indigestible. She no longer has value for you or your future. Go next.
Now if Desdi's theory were 100% applicable to all women, it would have truly uncovered something very important:
The dynamics of the relationship, whether it be toxic or healthy, is not an indicator of its health. The only indicator of a relationship's health is whether that woman has oneitis for the man she's with (in that LTR), how much that man has penetrated her emotionally and left a lasting mark, while still living it togheter.
This is the case in many relationships where the woman constantly complains about her "lazy man", or calls him an "4sshxle", or that she works too hard and "has to be a mother" for him, or that she always complain about something...etc, etc, etc....
but... Why doesn't she just leave? ...
Because He is her emotional weakness.
Her perennial oneitis.
Once a relationship, an LTR, like this is formed, those ones, are absolutely not a good example to follow.
Then, after, You add that she has settled down with the "boring man".
Well, as a mature man, now, you really want to experience the second relationship... the "boring one".
We men are truly interested in having special emotional moments, craft them, but if you're truly mature men, what you seek most is the long-term stability of that emotional fluctuation. You want as little of it as possible.
I don't understand how this could be a problem.
Your job as a man is to find a woman who isn't emotionally damaged by a guy from her past, but also not to be a manipulative man who has that power over her emotions. An emotionally healthy woman can detach herself and choose. But given the theory, it seems like this isn't possible.
Now, let's look at some points that need to be explained or expanded upon, regarding the theory.
It's not clear. The theory is based on how men from her past have touched her emotions, yet afterwards she says there will be "New" men who will rise up and replace the old ones?At the bottom of the list are her current interests.
These men rise to the top and replace previously attractive ones that will eventually disappear.
It really sounds like work. There's so much more to do in life for us men who control or focus on this kind of thing.To get to the top of a woman's high-score list, you have to tinker with her emotions a lot, intentional or not. The more you can make her feel, the higher your score, and the longer she'll be undeniably attracted to you, even after you've disappeared from her life. When she ruins your relationship, the best form of revenge you can give her is to be at the top of her high-score list.
If a man is looking for a woman to spend his life with, this phrase is a contradiction, because many long-term couples, married or not, with or without children, will sooner or later reach "compromise," "sacrifice," "commitment," and this quote sounds good, but reminiscent of a movie or just a love story.Victory is when you've dominated her because in her mind you're so strong that he'll never surpass you.
So you're telling that, as men, We should do all of this work in our life, just to be in a relationship with a woman who calls us an "*******", rather than a woman who has a healthy mind and communication?Telling you he was an a55hole and all the things he did. Once she's exhausted the fondest memories (aka idiotic stories) of her ex, she'll conclude her story with a lecture and a brief mention of her boring second husband, with a statement like, "This time I exposed the right man."
(I know that ******* is not an insult, but it's not coming from a healthy woman mind).
I've also noticed, that what you write is based on only one woman, so it's a somewhat small sample size to work with, and say that this works like that for "any" woman out there. Are we basing this on a woman who was healthy and emotionally secure or the contrary?
This isn't to discredit your theory, Desdinova; you've done an incredible job. I just wanted to add some perspective, clarify things.
Last edited:
