bukowski_merit said:
Perhaps, but what's different from tinder girls getting hit on by 100 random joe blows? And a POF/OKC/Match girl getting hit on by 100 random joe blows? I'd guess the Tinder girl would be more welcoming to it since she's preselecting us.
I have no issues firing up POF or OKC tonight and finding women who are willing to talk and eventually meet up and bang. It's easy on there. But tinder; it's like im pulling teeth to get a conversation going.
Tinder reminds me a lot of Skout (where it's also hard to get a decent conversation going). Maybe it could be the use of chat over email? Skout is also chat based...
I like to know the girl I'm meeting and me already have some form of rapport; especially in flirting area. This makes same night bangs simple... And because of the way I do things - I have very few failed dates.
That's mostly because of my screening process.
If a woman won't participate in it - then we both aren't going to get anywhere. Not giving up on it though.
I've never seen the girl's side of the Tinder experience before but I reckon it's far better than POF or OKC. If an attractive girl joined OKC or worse, POF, it's open season on her a$$. She'll get hounded by almost 20 messages a minute.
On Tinder, she has to swipe through different profiles and CHOOSE who SHE wants to talk to. She still has to wait for those same guys to choose her as well. This simmers down the process and makes it more comfortable for her. She's less likely to get hit on by 20 guys a minute.
Your last few sentences is one of the downsides of Tinder. You don't really know much about them due to short profiles. With conversation though, you can find out a bit which helps.
