I will preface this whole post by saying that i think the importance of game diminishes with age, as you get older money and status potential increases and the differences become more pronounced and the standards raise as a result, a guy who's like 40 probably needs a house and a car and a 6 figure income to impress girls, and that takes many years to get,
I think PUA stuff and game is most effective if you're anything under 25, getting girls in college or high school doesn't always require your own place let alone a car or a job lol, so game and looks reign supreme (and a relatively easily obtainable status, since it's easier to be good at football in high school than to own a night club or a sports team at 40)
You do not understand my point, I will try again and re-state my belief. What is physically attractive is in the eye of the CHICK. What you think and feel doesn't mean a fvcking thing. If she is attracted to the drugged out drummer look, THAT is what SHE is attracted to. I'm a guy that wears suits to everything, casual to me is no tie, no tats, no pins sticking out of my face... no way in the world a chick that's into the drugged out drummer dudes is going to be attracted to me... and it is not personal.
Oh i see, i get what you mean now and i agree.
Well yes... but you have to do something, you have to approach... strike up a conversation, get her number or ask her out. But I agree, it is a lot easier to turn off a chick that to build her interest.
If relying almost entirely on initial attraction works for you, that suggests very high LMS, but i don't think that's the average situation most guys are in, i don't think that's the only way to get girls.
Though i do agree that it's way easier to turn a girl off than on, that's probably reflective of one's game, a guy with good game isn't going to lower attraction with his interactions usually.
I dunno, i would definitely say that there are going to be times where things start lukewarm or even not that good and get way better from there. You can't just get better looking and richer 5 minutes into an interaction, so the words you said must have done something significant to raise interest
Come on man... they all sell the idea that you can get chicks with game only. They might tell you you have to approach approach approach, but they sell the idea that it's 'practice', and if you are failing... it's just that you need more practice... which is true, you will get better with practice and repetition, but it isn't REALLY game. It's that you happen to run into a chick that that likes what you have... and since you have 'practiced' you are not going to fvck it up.
Well do you think that the average guy gets 100% of the girls he is capable of getting? 50%?
do you think that there are plenty of guys who write off XYZ group/category/rating/ranking of girls being above their league or not attracted to them but in actuality they're just messing it up when they try?
Because in that scenario, approaches would be practice, and by improving your game, listening to what the PUAs are telling you, you'd suddenly see yourself attracting a higher quality of girl you couldn't have gotten before.
I think in that sense, there's definitely merit to the idea of calling it practice, until your game is good your can't get 100% of the value of your SMV
I also think that a lot of guys who come to need help from gurus or whatever just need to practice approaching to get girls, and that may be part of why they say that you just need to practice, there really are a lot of guys out there who could get the girls they wanted just by learning to talk to girls (we even have people like that on the forum)
