You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.
I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.
Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.
These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.
2:15 In a similar fashion:
She represents everything wrong with the current era of women.This 40-something harridan said the chump was a "great guy", but the attractive guy she had been "casually seeing" turned out to be a "douche".She then blabs on about this being a "life lesson" ...
www.sosuave.net
I agree that nearly all platonic friends will never be upgraded to boyfriend. Most platonic friends are stuck in a zone where they aren't getting pussie from the woman.The friend guy generally will not be upgraded to bf. It doesn’t matter if she breaks up with her current guy or goes through 12 breakups in the future.
I have chosen not to be friends with women that I find physically attractive in any way. I started doing that in high school and am still doing that in my early 40s. It's been a good idea.Either don’t be friends with women or, if you do, just accept that she’s F-ing other guys and not you.
Most male-female platonic interactions are the latter. I don't think unmarried men and unmarried women are good at being platonic friends. I think unmarried men and unmarried women can be passable acquaintances.I do agree with Mike Sartain about how there is a difference between friends and friendzone. In the former, you have no expectations of sex/dating. In the latter, the guy is hurt about the situation and holding on to false hope.
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
This is what a parking orbit means. He is like a reserve husband for when she thinks that an attractive man is unattainable in time to make babies or marriage.As for your original question, I don't agree. A "parking orbit" means nothing. It doesn't mean that guy is going to get laid with her in the future.
Women don't commonly do this. An aging woman (late 20s - late 30s) will meet someone new (either through apps, social media, or real life) when the clock is ticking to get married or get her "Last Call" 1-2 babies. She typically won't pull that guy from her existing orbiter pool. If she does this, she'll settle for a random beta with whom she shares no past history.This is what a parking orbit means. He is like a reserve husband for when she thinks that an attractive man is unattainable in time to make babies or marriage.
Agree with this. If a chick wants to be friends I have no problem with it. But I have abundance so I'm not going to be longing for her if she's not interested. Actually what's happened in the past is some "friends" have later opened up sexually to me. So the less I care, the better, no matter what.I do agree with Mike Sartain about how there is a difference between friends and friendzone. In the former, you have no expectations of sex/dating. In the latter, the guy is hurt about the situation and holding on to false hope.
A man can only be friends to a woman he is not attracted to. And even then, why would he hang out with said woman?I do agree with Mike Sartain about how there is a difference between friends and friendzone. In the former, you have no expectations of sex/dating. In the latter, the guy is hurt about the situation and holding on to false hope.
When I was dating a girl back a few years ago, after a few months, she said she wanted to continue to hang out, but no longer exclusive. I told her bye. She was shocked, and I went silent. She then reached back out a month later, my birthday, Thanksgiving and Christmas; I never responded.This 40-something harridan said the chump was a "great guy", but the attractive guy she had been "casually seeing" turned out to be a "douche".She then blabs on about this being a "life lesson" ...
Yes, being "friends" (i.e., wanting to hang out, not just LJBF and avoid him) is essentially an orbital manouver. And for the man that has no options, he has to stay within her gravity well.Agree with this. If a chick wants to be friends I have no problem with it. But I have abundance so I'm not going to be longing for her if she's not interested. Actually what's happened in the past is some "friends" have later opened up sexually to me. So the less I care, the better, no matter what.
Eh, I'd kept in contact with a chick I was no longer attracted to (she got big).A man can only be friends to a woman he is not attracted to. And even then, why would he hang out with said woman?
If a man hangs out with a woman as "friends", he is attracted to her.
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
I have always rejected the friend zone over the years. It has been one of the best decisions that I have made in the mating environment.You should always reject the friendzone. It offers no benefits for you. I’ve been there.
Well, one would presume that a friend wouldn't be paying for her - just like platonic friends don't pay. I think the Friendzone could be worth for SocialCircleMaxxing as the man could hit on her friends, etc.A woman offering to be friends with you means she gets all the benefits of being in a relationship (your time, validation, emotional bandwidth and money spent on her etc.) without the s*x.
It’s a win for her and a loss for you. You should always reject the friendzone. It offers no benefits for you. I’ve been there.
Unless the man is aSome husbands might object to a married woman spending time with an unmarried male. If a marriage is decaying, the married woman might start getting feelings for an unmarried male friend, but that's usually less common. The unmarried male friend who has been in her life for years has usually been disqualified from sexual contact when she's ready to have an affair. She would been more likely to have an affair with a man that's more of a fringe acquaintance, a former co-worker, or even a current co-worker. She also can find an affair partner in nightlife venues or using tech methods.
What is a puffda?Unless the man is a puffda, it would be totally inappropriate.
I should have said poofta.What is a puffda?
en.wiktionary.org
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.