What's wrong on the "no games" behaviour?

[tesla8520]

If you actually found a good woman, you might not want to play games.

 

[Travel memoir21]

You are correct and onto something brother, Good quality woman can see the playerish fassage a mile away and will have no problems backing off. The best type of relationships often goes with the flow and requires no games on your part because you're coming from a good frame, value and a sense of purpose. The less games the better.

 

[Rocky_Hendrix]

You are correct and onto something brother, Good quality woman can see the playerish fassage a mile away and will have no problems backing off. The best type of relationships often goes with the flow and requires no games on your part because you're coming from a good frame, value and a sense of purpose. The less games the better.

How game can be less? Game after a while should be an integral part of your identity, so how can you behave less than yourself?

Besides this, why ever "good quality" women will want to back off game? they want to play, if they do not that with you, it does mean they do not want to play.

" The best type of relationships often goes with the flow and requires no games on your part because you're coming from a good frame, value and a sense of purpose." We know what does "flow" means, but AFC will read your statement like: "Alright, I should not do anything. Just be myself.".

"the less game, the better"??? What does it even mean? "good frame, value and a sense of purpose" are all parts of game, so by saying "less game", you literally mean less frame control, value and sense of purpose. Blissful ignorance of Beta.

To conclude, I think that "If you actually found a good woman, you might not want to play games." is a statement uttered from the mouth of beta, nothing less nothing more. You maybe red-pilled, but you still have not yet killed inner AFC/BETA.

Good luck!

 

[Sega Genesis]

I think a man should always employ a bit of "Game" in his relationships and in life... so should women (Girl Game).

However...

There is a big difference between 'having game" and 'playing games'... below sums it up beautifully imo.

>>"Having game" is the confident, authentic ability to flirt, converse and spark attraction, whereas "playing games" is a manipulative, dishonest approach involving mind f*cks, shyt tests and extreme push-pull tactics.

While 'having game' builds connection, 'playing games' causes mistrust, anxiety, and instability.<<

 

[tksniper]

I think a man should always employ a bit of "Game" in his relationships and in life... so should women (Girl Game).

However...

There is a big difference between 'having game" and 'playing games'... below sums it up beautifully imo.

>>"Having game" is the confident, authentic ability to flirt, converse and spark attraction, whereas "playing games" is a manipulative, dishonest approach involving mind f*cks, shyt tests and extreme push-pull tactics.

While 'having game' builds connection, 'playing games' causes mistrust, anxiety, and instability.<<

I would replace the word “game” with “value”. Have value and you will naturally and authentically behave in your best ways. You won’t even have to think about “game”. “Game” is a childish word. As adults, let’s use the word “value” instead. The word “value” cuts through all the bs and theories.

And in every situation with women and people, you know if you are coming from a place of high value or low value.

 

[BaronOfHair]

If you actually found a good woman, you might not want to play games.

All relations between humans contain "games" of some sort