What women want in a man;

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

We all know that women SAY that they want a nice guy, but yet they always fall for the jerk. Why is this?

It seems that many of you have forgotten. Pook talked about this before. Women DO want a sweet, loyal, 'nice guy', but they want him to have a backbone. They fall for the jerk because he shows strength, he shows SOME traits of manliness such as not taking **** from people or putting his plans and ambitions before her. The jerk is not a pushover like the nice guy, and thus she can respect him. The nice guy in contrast lets people walk all over him though, and she cannot respect him because of that. You cannot love someone you do not respect.

There are 2 categories men are usually grouped into: lover and provider. Now even though the jerk is an *******, she still respects him and can thus still love him for the masculine traits he has. The provider can obviously provide her with what she wants so she still wants him, but does not love him, as she cannot because she does not respect the nice guy.

Women want a man with strength, a man who isn't afraid of anyone or anything and focuses on his passions before her because this shows independence of her and that means he does not need her. These traits are the traits of a leader (aka an alpha). Evolution has it so that we can subconsciously determine who is and who isn't the leader of a group. The leader is usually has the highest ranking in a social class, and thus has the highest value. This is why we teach you all here to put your ambitions and passion before women, because it shows the traits of a leader.

Women want a man who has the strength of the 'jerk', yet is still kind and has morals like that of a nice guy. A woman wants a man can be her lover, but also provide for her too.

 

[ChristopherColumbus]

Yes, I think a woman is attracted to a man who has not been completely socialized [domesticated]. She admires him for his existential strength, and she sees that often in the 'anti-social' jerk, who no doubt she eventually sees through.This guy merely reacts and rebels against the norm with nothing much of substance going on in his inner life.

The 'real deal' is the great guy, who knows how to pay his dues to society, but rises above it all. He allows all his instincts to flourish, he is a natural aristocrat, educated and accomplished, with a deep understanding of life... and women. He has authenticity, a natural and emotional intensity... as if grounded in the cosmic energy of life. Women want to be understood.

 

[devilkingx2]

We all know that women SAY that they want a nice guy, but yet they always fall for the jerk. Why is this?

the exact same reason that if a woman asked you what you want in a girl you wouldn't say "a big tittied slut" regardless of how true it was, it makes you look bad even if it is true.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

the exact same reason that if a woman asked you what you want in a girl you wouldn't say "a big tittied slut" regardless of how true it was, it makes you look bad even if it is true.

Women don't WANT jerks, they just fall for him because there doesn't seem to be any better guys. And they end up getting hurt by the guy later on anyway. And why did they get hurt by him? Because he didn't have any nice qualities, and because of that she ends up feeling used and abused, but she still 'loves' him so she sticks with him and continues to get eaten up inside until the bridge is burned.

 

[devilkingx2]

Women don't WANT jerks, they just fall for him because there doesn't seem to be any better guys. And they end up getting hurt by the guy later on anyway. And why did they get hurt by him? Because he didn't have any nice qualities, and because of that she ends up feeling used and abused, but she still 'loves' him so she sticks with him and continues to get eaten up inside until the bridge is burned.

all that means is that women generally prefer looks, status, etc. over personality which makes them dumb and shallow so i don't feel bad for them.

we've all seen this first hand, i've known a girl who was really upset when her crush got bored of her and dropped her for another girl... except that's always what he does, for years before her and years after her so nobody was at all surprised about it except her.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

all that means is that women generally prefer looks, status, etc. over personality which makes them dumb and shallow so i don't feel bad for them

This is instinctive. Looks show traits of masculinity by exhibiting signs of higher levels of androgens, such as a strong jawline or an enhanced musculature. This means that he is able to physically protect her. Status shows your ranking amongst others in a social heirarchy which will in turn reflect how others view you. A lot of money = a lot of resources which means that you can use those resources to improve your quality of life and have less strain during your life. It is a law of nature that all living organisms work to expend the least amount of energy as possible. Less strain means less energy expenditure which also means living a longer life.

So, is this really superficial?

 

[PeasantPlayer]

Women are broken

 

[PeasantPlayer]

 

[dude99]

Women want a nice guy. However they aren't attracted to nice guy. Women don't like jerks. However they are attracted to the jerk.

This conflict in their own mind is why most relationships with women fail.

 

[devilkingx2]

This is instinctive. Looks show traits of masculinity by exhibiting signs of higher levels of androgens, such as a strong jawline or an enhanced musculature. This means that he is able to physically protect her. Status shows your ranking amongst others in a social heirarchy which will in turn reflect how others view you. A lot of money = a lot of resources which means that you can use those resources to improve your quality of life and have less strain during your life. It is a law of nature that all living organisms work to expend the least amount of energy as possible. Less strain means less energy expenditure which also means living a longer life.

So, is this really superficial?

what do you think of guys who want to date the HB9 with the horrible personality over the HB7 with a heart of gold?

personally i think it's equally dumb when guys do it as when girls do it. so i don't feel bad for guys who date the hottest girl without paying heed to personality and get screwed for it, naturally because i'm all for equality, i don't feel sympathy for girls who get screwed by obvious players either lol.

 

[Reykhel]

I think it was Paul Janka that said something like "Trustworthy, but edgy"

They want the fun of the rollercoaster but want the security of known that the rollercoaster is actually "safe".

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

what do you think of guys who want to date the HB9 with the horrible personality over the HB7 with a heart of gold?

It's all a preference. I would 'date' a hb9 if she had a **** personality only if we were fvcking, otherwise I would stay away from her or else she will get ripped into. The HB9 who is a true b!tch will push people away though and won't date anyone. I would much prefer a 7 who does stuff for me.

Guys do it because naturally some men feel that they do not need a woman to make their lives easier (as it is written in their genes) but society as raised them to become the opposite.

 

[marmel75]

A guy that makes her cvm, orgasm and squirt more than she ever has in her life...once you are able to accomplish this on a regular basis you will never have to worry about a dry spell again...they will seek you out...

And if she has made the mistake of telling her friends...so will they...

 

[BeExcellent]

The 'real deal' is the great guy, who knows how to pay his dues to society, but rises above it all. He allows all his instincts to flourish, he is a natural aristocrat, educated and accomplished, with a deep understanding of life... and women. He has authenticity, a natural and emotional intensity... as if grounded

The above is true for me. This is the type man I am drawn to and also who I attract. But I'm older and know my value, what I'm looking for, and how to filter efficiently.

Thing is not every man is to this point. It takes time and development to get where the above describes a man. So when young, the trick for a woman is to figure out who is going to BECOME that guy. Not easy. This is why more experienced men appeal to younger women. It takes the guesswork out of figuring out potential.

 

[Trump]

There are 2 categories men are usually grouped into: lover and provider. Now even though the jerk is an *******, she still respects him and can thus still love him for the masculine traits he has. The provider can obviously provide her with what she wants so she still wants him, but does not love him, as she cannot because she does not respect the nice guy.

Bro you may be confusing the issues. Providing has nothing to do with being a nice guy. And being a nice guy has nothing to do with providing. You can be a jerk and still provide. And you can be a nice guy and not provide.

Women want a man with strength, a man who isn't afraid of anyone or anything and focuses on his passions before her because this shows independence of her and that means he does not need her. These traits are the traits of a leader (aka an alpha). Evolution has it so that we can subconsciously determine who is and who isn't the leader of a group. The leader is usually has the highest ranking in a social class, and thus has the highest value. This is why we teach you all here to put your ambitions and passion before women, because it shows the traits of a leader.

Again bro it seems like you are confusing the issues. You can put the woman on the same level as ambitions and passions. As long as they don't suck energy out of you or make like difficult or get in the way. There are leaders who don't know how to talk to girls. There are followers who have slept with the hottest women on the planet. Being a leader has nothing to do with getting women.

Look at Obama. He is a pretty good leader, orator, dresser, and has a lot of money. He is still sacred of wife.

Women want a man who has the strength of the 'jerk', yet is still kind and has morals like that of a nice guy. A woman wants a man can be her lover, but also provide for her too.

I hate to say this bro. But it's almost like 'who cares what women want.' It's about what you want.

Don't listen Pook, listen to PoonKing. He said it best. Your job is sex, her job is the relationship.

 

[ImTheDoubleGreatest!]

Bro you may be confusing the issues. Providing has nothing to do with being a nice guy. And being a nice guy has nothing to do with providing. You can be a jerk and still provide. And you can be a nice guy and not provide.



Again bro it seems like you are confusing the issues. You can put the woman on the same level as ambitions and passions. As long as they don't suck energy out of you or make like difficult or get in the way. There are leaders who don't know how to talk to girls. There are followers who have slept with the hottest women on the planet. Being a leader has nothing to do with getting women.

Look at Obama. He is a pretty good leader, orator, dresser, and has a lot of money. He is still sacred of wife.



I hate to say this bro. But it's almost like 'who cares what women want.' It's about what you want.

Don't listen Pook, listen to PoonKing. He said it best. Your job is sex, her job is the relationship.

The idea of lover/provider doesn't just mean material goods. It can be attention, compliments, or romantic gestures too. A 'jerk', so to speak, can provide. But he will never be fully secured under her wing like a nice guy. A 'nice guy' may not always provide for her, but only because he cannot. And when I use the term 'leader', it does not mean someone who is the leader of a group, but someone who CAN. Someone who isn't easily swayed and does what he wants, as you have said. Most real-world 'leaders' aren't really leaders at all. They just studied a little more in school or bribed their way to power. Obama isn't a good example of being a good leader either because that statement is very debateable depending on who you tell that to. Rahm Emanuel is Mayor of Chicago and he sucks ass. When I said leader, I meant someone with a leader PERSONALITY, not someone who is necessarily in charge of a large group of people. I know this is sounding super philosophical like I'm overthinking things, but there's not really a good way to explain what I mean without writing too much.

And Pook's and Poon King's goals go hand in hand. Pook's was essentially self-improvement. PK is to do what is in your best interest. You cannot improve yourself if you do not place yourself and your ambitions above everyone/everything else. In other words, if you want to improve yourself you need to do what is in your best interest.