video: The Surprising Psychology Of OnlyFans Simps

[MatureDJ]

The author says that it gives the user the same dopamine hits as a LDR.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

And the same raw c0ck from jacking off so much.

 

[SgtSplacker]

I went on that site to check it out. Saw the immediate paywall and closed the page. I figured it was exactly like this.

 

[samspade]

Good breakdown. Funny how money changes everything.

Sidenote, I read that creators on OnlyFans are required to upload a picture of themselves holding an official photo ID (license, passport etc.) to confirm their identity. We're probably six months away from the most epic data hack of all time.

 

[MatureDJ]

I went on that site to check it out. Saw the immediate paywall and closed the page. I figured it was exactly like this.

OnlyFans: Digital footprint concern raised over images

A rise in people posting explicit material online prompts a warning to consider "digital footprint."

www.bbc.com

A data scientist said posting explicit content online during the pandemic has helped to pay off her debts.

Rachel - in her 30s and from south Wales - left her full-time job during the pandemic for a better life balance.
She turned to OnlyFans to supplement her income, earning more than £2,800 in four weeks since launching her page.

 

[deadmasterx]

It's still hard for me to imagine that there are people that actually pays for watching other people ****ing or even to see some titties. Even paying for a ***** that you can **** is less stupid than this.

One interesting point is that the most famous women that "works" with that actually doesn't take nudes. They're not showing their nipplesor their pussies. They keep on, taking spicy pictures, making these ****heads pay for "private snap acc stories" and etc, but still never showing their bodies completely. Maybe that's the key of success? Building your whole "career" on making people expect that someday you'll give them a glance of your "golden *****". I think that it explains a lot of what kind of people consume this kind of content and what kind of women produces it.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

It's still hard for me to imagine that there are people that actually pays for watching other people ****ing or even to see some titties. Even paying for a ***** that you can **** is less stupid than this.

One interesting point is that the most famous women that "works" with that actually doesn't take nudes. They're not showing their nipplesor their pussies. They keep on, taking spicy pictures, making these ****heads pay for "private snap acc stories" and etc, but still never showing their bodies completely. Maybe that's the key of success? Building your whole "career" on making people expect that someday you'll give them a glance of your "golden *****". I think that it explains a lot of what kind of people consume this kind of content and what kind of women produces it.

With so much free content out there it is mind boggling to me as well.

 

[derby1]

in the UK the newspapers made out that feminism and female rights, put a stop to our Page 3. Women were outraged etc blah blah

Page 3 was always famous for being a topless woman, as soon as you turned the front of the newspaper.

Ironically The sun media group have all got their hands in the only fans pie.

it had nothing to do with female rights, they saw how thirsty men were.

 

[RangerMIke]

With so much free content out there it is mind boggling to me as well.

It's not about the content, it's about the 'girlfriend' illusion. I have a friend that is an OnlyFans model and for her it's a full time job responding to messages from her 'fans'. Once they are in she up sells them on 'exclusive' content. I haven't seen her in over a month and the last time we met for coffee and catching up, she spent the entire time responding to messages. She showed me some of her page, and it was all sexy stuff but no nudes that I noticed... and what she posts is just a bunch of BS about music, fashion, yoga, her dog, and stuff going on around town. She makes about $10k a month doing this.

If all she did was post pictures it wouldn't work. She has to respond to them. They'll send messages like "How are you doing today beautiful?" She will respond back as soon as she can asking about his day. It's all very positive and friendly.

She also gets some modeling gigs doing this.

She started doing this about 3 months ago, she'll also market products from vendors, and she gets a commission on sales made through her website. She still has a Patreon platform, but she wasn't making nearly as much money doing that.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

It's not about the content, it's about the 'girlfriend' illusion. I have a friend that is an OnlyFans model and for her it's a full time job responding to messages from her 'fans'. Once they are in she up sells them on 'exclusive' content. I haven't seen her in over a month and the last time we met for coffee and catching up, she spent the entire time responding to messages. She showed me some of her page, and it was all sexy stuff but no nudes that I noticed... and what she posts is just a bunch of BS about music, fashion, yoga, her dog, and stuff going on around town. She makes about $10k a month doing this.

If all she did was post pictures it wouldn't work. She has to respond to them. They'll send messages like "How are you doing today beautiful?" She will respond back as soon as she can asking about his day. It's all very positive and friendly.

She also gets some modeling gigs doing this.

She started doing this about 3 months ago, she'll also market products from vendors, and she gets a commission on sales made through her website. She still has a Patreon platform, but she wasn't making nearly as much money doing that.

So sad guys are so pathetic...but I guess she is milking it for all she can while she can.

 

[GioWolf]

Not only will women not f--- beta men, they will straight up take advantage of them and milk them for as much as they can. This same business model is used by heroin dealers, who cares if they are an addict, keep selling them product. I want to start a rehab for simps.

 

[Dash Riprock]

I've never seen OnlyFans and have no intention of checking it out. It find it interesting Bella Thorn made $100,000 on it in a day or week, I can't recall but read an article a few months back. But is OnlyFans really any different than back in the 70's and 80's when guys bought Playboy or Penthouse magazine? Every kid, me included, had a friend whose dad had a stack of Playboys. We waited until the guy's parents went out and looked at every one of the mags. Hilarious.

I'm not sure how much it costs to join OnlyFans or the models charge, but for the guy who wines and dines some girl and then gets a peck on the cheek as a "thank you," OnlyFans is probably a better deal for him.

How many SS members look at porn (100% of the hands go up, haha)? Ok, so while you're looking at free porn, you COULD be studying finance or real estate or some other business discipline--or working your real job if you're working from home now, right? So you're actually losing money every time you look at "free" porn. What makes that any different than the guy who's on OF?

Just saying.

~Dash~

 

[taiyuu_otoko]

It's not about the content, it's about the 'girlfriend' illusion.

That's the key distinction.

Nothing else can provide the illusion of being in a relationship with another human. Back and forth communication, etc.

If anybody remembers the show "Lost" part of the backstory of John Locke was he "fell in love" with a phone sex girl.

Onlyfans is kind of like that.

 

[TonyTenner]

I've never seen OnlyFans and have no intention of checking it out. It find it interesting Bella Thorn made $100,000 on it in a day or week, I can't recall but read an article a few months back. But is OnlyFans really any different than back in the 70's and 80's when guys bought Playboy or Penthouse magazine? Every kid, me included, had a friend whose dad had a stack of Playboys. We waited until the guy's parents went out and looked at every one of the mags. Hilarious.

I'm not sure how much it costs to join OnlyFans or the models charge, but for the guy who wines and dines some girl and then gets a peck on the cheek as a "thank you," OnlyFans is probably a better deal for him.

How many SS members look at porn (100% of the hands go up, haha)? Ok, so while you're looking at free porn, you COULD be studying finance or real estate or some other business discipline--or working your real job if you're working from home now, right? So you're actually losing money every time you look at "free" porn. What makes that any different than the guy who's on OF?

Just saying.

~Dash~

I think it's different and it's the first time the monetization of the explosion in simping and thirst has gone main stream. OnlyFans is now covered in mainstream media, and you see it actually being defended. Imagine YouPorn being defended in the MSM. OnlyFans has nearly 100,000 British "creators" - that's an insane number. It's the monetization of thirst after decades of the feminisation of society.

I work in startups and really, everyone here could easily profit. Red pill awareness can be used to creates products. The RP shows society and human psychology as it really is. And it reliably predicts trends. It wouldn't be hard to think of products to profit from that. The issue is ethics - would you want to profit from the ever-increasing thirst in modern society? It's not for me, may be for some people though.

 

[Lookatu]

But is OnlyFans really any different than back in the 70's and 80's when guys bought Playboy or Penthouse magazine?

Difference is GF type interaction and personalization as others have pointed out.
It would be analogous to calling those 1(900) numbers back in the day to talk to an actual female(whether real or not). You had the illusion of someone giving a damn about you and wanting to interact with you.

It's very sad either way... A total new low for males in our society.

 

[Mike32ct]

We go on and on about women wanting attention. This is a clear case of guys wanting attention so badly that they are willing to pay for it.

 

[Romanemp22]

Instagram is full of sl0ts with onlyfans. Also a lot of them do live shows with tips and many idiots are giving tips worth up to 10k even.

Just imagine paying 10k dollars, euros to some b1tch who you will never fvck. With that money you could've fvck a whole escort line.

 

[RangerMIke]

Ok, so while you're looking at free porn, you COULD be studying finance or real estate or some other business discipline--or working your real job if you're working from home now, right? So you're actually losing money every time you look at "free" porn. What makes that any different than the guy who's on OF?

Truth! Time is money. Nothing is 'free', everything costs your most precious commodity.... time.

 

[Lookatu]

Just imagine paying 10k dollars, euros to some b1tch who you will never fvck. With that money you could've fvck a whole escort line.

The issue in the US at least is prostitution is illegal in most areas(except certain parts of Nevada). I guarantee you if it was legal in every state, you'd see less activity on sites like OnlyFans and more money would be diverted to the sex workers.

It would be interesting to see the web analytics from OnlyFans to see where most of this traffic is coming from. I'm betting US being the main culprit. Germany practically having zero traffic there as prostitution is legal there.

 

[Romanemp22]

The issue in the US at least is prostitution is illegal in most areas(except certain parts of Nevada). I guarantee you if it was legal in every state, you'd see less activity on sites like OnlyFans and more money would be diverted to the sex workers.

It would be interesting to see the web analytics from OnlyFans to see where most of this traffic is coming from. I'm betting US being the main culprit. Germany practically having zero traffic there as prostitution is legal there.

In Europe some escort companies are even not considered as prostitution. It's more like a "date" if someone wants to impress his colleagues on evening etc.