"How I Made Sure No Woman Ever Friend-Zoned Me Again"
She calls you when her car breaks down. When she needs help moving. When some guy she's actually dating treats her badly.
You're the listener. The reliable one. The guy who would treat her so much better, if she'd just open her eyes.
She won't. You trained her to see you as the low-effort option — the friend who requires zero risk and zero investment. Every favor dug the hole deeper.
The "22 Rules" break the pattern. You'll stop auditioning for a role she already cast and become the man she chases instead. It starts with Rule 1.
US Treasury Seizes $80 Million in Gold From Private Owner
- Thread starter DJ Logic
- Start date
"She Wants a Man, Not a Boy"
You asked her if she wanted to grab coffee. Then you asked if the time worked. Then you asked if the place was okay. Then you asked if she'd prefer tea.
Four questions. Four chances for her to say no. Four signals that you're terrified of making a decision.
Plan it. Pick the place. Pick the time. Tell her where to meet you. She'll either show up or she won't.
Either way, you look like a man instead of a scared little boy.
Stolen property is stolen property. It doesn't matter one fück iota how long ago the coins were stolen, it doesn't matter one fück iota how many hands the stolen coins went through or how the coins were discovered, it doesn't matter one fück iota how much the collection is worth, this is not a world of "finders keepers, losers weepers." The coins were never circulated and if the coins were stolen—it's hard to imagine they were not—then the coins belong to the Treasury.
^^ Yeah but they still need to prove it. Otherwise they could just walk into your house, take any change they find lying around, and claim it was "stolen".
This whole business will probably end up in court and if the treasury can't prove that the coins were stolen they will have to return them.
This whole business will probably end up in court and if the treasury can't prove that the coins were stolen they will have to return them.
I agree with you, completely.mikeyb said:
I don't agree with the blogger who said that the Treasury would need to prove Israel Swift, the scrap metal dealer with the safety deposit box, had involvement, and I don't agree with any outrage at this point. It's good the coins were confiscated for safekeeping and now it will be a matter for the courts, as you say, to sort out if the coins were in fact stolen.
Drdeee
Banned
Rogue said:
I happen to disagree with you. Of course, morally you are correct. But by law I'm pretty sure there is time limit. Murder on the other hand don't have time limit.
What's wrong here is government braking the law.
Personally I don't give a fak about that 80 million. For me it don't matter if that private owner had them or the big boys who stole it from him now have it. It don't matter for me at all. The only thing that touches me and I have problem with is government braking the law. :flowers:
P.S. This opens a door for the big boys to confiscate YOUR gold now. In US history this has already been done.
"She's Out of Your League"
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
No, there is no statute of limitation. Statute of limitations only apply to criminal convictions. This is the reacquisition of stolen property. The original bandits who originally stole the coins are long dead, the scrap dealer with the safety deposit box may have bought the coins without knowing their true origin and is also dead. Nobody will be charged with a crime. The Treasury simply wants their coins back.
Drdeee
Banned
Rogue said:
You are a highly confused person, it wouldn't be smart for me to argue with you.
Drdeee
Banned
I used Mark Twain principle in my previous post.
"Why Women Dump the Guys Who Try the Hardest"
You paid for dinner. You drove. You said "whatever you want is fine" every single time. All the effort, no expectations.
And she left anyway — probably for a guy who makes her pick up the pizza.
Painful. Also predictable. Her mind quietly concludes that anything requiring zero effort from her is worth exactly zero. You became a free sample, and free samples get taken for granted.
The 22 Rules flip the dynamic. Small shifts that get her investing effort, money, and time in you — until SHE'S the one afraid of losing YOU.
demagogue:
a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.
You have not made one substantive point in this thread which either you did not concede or was adequately refuted. You resort to insult because you are pointless.
a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.
You have not made one substantive point in this thread which either you did not concede or was adequately refuted. You resort to insult because you are pointless.