“The 22 Rules That Flip the Script With Women… And How You Can Use Them Tonight”
Most guys accidentally kill attraction before they even speak. They assume they need a bigger bank account, a better physique, or smoother lines. They miss the point.
Female desire operates on a specific set of psychological triggers. Break them, and you're invisible. Follow them, and you become magnetic.
I learned this the hard way. Years of freezing up. Getting friend-zoned. Watching other guys walk away with the girl I wanted. Then I discovered a set of 22 simple rules that rewired my entire approach.
US Treasury Seizes $80 Million in Gold From Private Owner
- Thread starter DJ Logic
- Start date
Stolen property is stolen property. It doesn't matter one fück iota how long ago the coins were stolen, it doesn't matter one fück iota how many hands the stolen coins went through or how the coins were discovered, it doesn't matter one fück iota how much the collection is worth, this is not a world of "finders keepers, losers weepers." The coins were never circulated and if the coins were stolen—it's hard to imagine they were not—then the coins belong to the Treasury.
^^ Yeah but they still need to prove it. Otherwise they could just walk into your house, take any change they find lying around, and claim it was "stolen".
This whole business will probably end up in court and if the treasury can't prove that the coins were stolen they will have to return them.
This whole business will probably end up in court and if the treasury can't prove that the coins were stolen they will have to return them.
I agree with you, completely.mikeyb said:
I don't agree with the blogger who said that the Treasury would need to prove Israel Swift, the scrap metal dealer with the safety deposit box, had involvement, and I don't agree with any outrage at this point. It's good the coins were confiscated for safekeeping and now it will be a matter for the courts, as you say, to sort out if the coins were in fact stolen.
Drdeee
Banned
Rogue said:
I happen to disagree with you. Of course, morally you are correct. But by law I'm pretty sure there is time limit. Murder on the other hand don't have time limit.
What's wrong here is government braking the law.
Personally I don't give a fak about that 80 million. For me it don't matter if that private owner had them or the big boys who stole it from him now have it. It don't matter for me at all. The only thing that touches me and I have problem with is government braking the law. :flowers:
P.S. This opens a door for the big boys to confiscate YOUR gold now. In US history this has already been done.
Just because a woman listens to you and acts interested in what you say doesn't mean she really is. She might just be acting polite, while silently wishing that the date would hurry up and end, or that you would go away... and never come back.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
No, there is no statute of limitation. Statute of limitations only apply to criminal convictions. This is the reacquisition of stolen property. The original bandits who originally stole the coins are long dead, the scrap dealer with the safety deposit box may have bought the coins without knowing their true origin and is also dead. Nobody will be charged with a crime. The Treasury simply wants their coins back.
Drdeee
Banned
Rogue said:
You are a highly confused person, it wouldn't be smart for me to argue with you.
Drdeee
Banned
I used Mark Twain principle in my previous post.
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
demagogue:
a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.
You have not made one substantive point in this thread which either you did not concede or was adequately refuted. You resort to insult because you are pointless.
a political leader who seeks support by appealing to popular desires and prejudices rather than by using rational argument.
You have not made one substantive point in this thread which either you did not concede or was adequately refuted. You resort to insult because you are pointless.