tweet: Young men aren’t having sex!

[MatureDJ]

https://twitter.com/i/web/status/1582166917174808577

my opinion: The graph for men not getting poon is having an erection.

 

[EyeBRollin]

The thread comments are all over the place. It sounds like she’s advocating for the legalization of prostitution, as an outlet for the disgruntled men that aren’t having sex. That’s at least a reasonable discussion point. Somehow though the radical feminists see it as “men have no right to sex!” The internet is toxic all around. Every sentence written in text finds a way to be interpreted 50 different ways.

 

[The Duke]

Coincides with the rise in online dating.

 

[Bokanovsky]

Reading some of the responses to that tweet makes it clear that it's all over for the western society. We are way past the breaking point.

 

[Doctor Europeo]

The thread comments are all over the place. It sounds like she’s advocating for the legalization of prostitution, as an outlet for the disgruntled men that aren’t having sex. That’s at least a reasonable discussion point. Somehow though the radical feminists see it as “men have no right to sex!” The internet is toxic all around. Every sentence written in text finds a way to be interpreted 50 different ways.

Oh well, at least she´s advocating for a solution. My initial reaction was going to be something like "Well, why doesnt she do something about it and start having sex with all of these incels intead of just talking about the problem?"

I dont get incels. Cant they afford a trip to Vegas?

 

[lgbs2004]

It's OVER for YoungVirginCels

 

[Gamisch]

Reading some of the responses to that tweet makes it clear that it's all over for the western society. We are way past the breaking point.

Yeah, right to have sex = right to rape. The scary thing is numbers are never accurate with these investigations. Imagine men who did went on a sex tourism trip stated they did had sex..


Funny thing is I hear more and more women complaining as well. Society is crumbling and it's about time politics getting involved. For once a comprehensive, well documented video about this topic:

 

[SW15]

All men pay for sex, either directly or indirectly.

A lot of 18-30 men are sexless because they aren't directly paying for sex. These numbers would be lower if the 18-30 men were more financially able to directly pay for sex.

The last 2 sentences combined with the nature of swipe apps is why young men are not getting laid.

My sense is that 31+ men who aren't getting laid conventionally are more likely to directly pay for sex. As a result of these men directly paying for sex, they aren't categorized as sexless men.

Alexandra Hunt is also a woke SJW feminist.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

Coincides with the rise in online dating.

Online dating was around since the mid 1990s, why did it take 10 years to manifest if this was the case? The numbers of men having sex increased for over a decade+.

I'd say it's due to low T levels reaching a tipping point/point of no return and lack of socialization skills due to constantly being on a screens rather than in person with people.

 

[SW15]

Online dating was around since the mid 1990s, why did it take 10 years to manifest if this was the case? The numbers of men having sex increased for That decade+

I'd say it's due to low T levels reaching a tipping point/point of no return and lack of socialization skills due to constantly being on a screens rather than in person with people.

Remember that online dating websites were very stigmatized from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s.

The screens and socialization issue that you mention is very real and also part of the reason.

Women with poor social skills from too much screen time can get laid. I've seen that happen with the women in my primary social circle. Most of my friends' girlfriends/wives are somewhat socially inept yet were never lacking for sex. These women are roughly mid-Millennials around age 35 too.

 

[Gamisch]

Remember that online dating websites were very stigmatized from the mid-1990s to the mid-2000s.

The screens and socialization issue that you mention is very real and also part of the reason.

Women with poor social skills from too much screen time can get laid. I've seen that happen with the women in my primary social circle. Most of my friends' girlfriends/wives are somewhat socially inept yet were never lacking for sex. These women are roughly mid-Millennials around age 35 too.

Exactly. I was fecking with a young woman recently . We were hanging out when I made a joke about Tinder. Her response was:" why the hell would I need Tinder?".

Personally my biggest issue is the fact women will delete and unmatch real quick. It completely takes away my eagerness to have a "normal " conversation. If a woman likes me its easy to get her number and take it from there. Even then I see these women are bad conversationalists. During the golden era of OLD this wasn't that big of an issue.

Again all personal takes, but to me OLD always has a cowardly smell. Hard to explain this sentiment, but it seems unnatural to meet women like that. Like processed food, still food but it doesn't feel right.

By the way ,you will like these video. Numbers , facts and statistics AND rollo is in it.

 

[The Duke]

Online dating was around since the mid 1990s, why did it take 10 years to manifest if this was the case? The numbers of men having sex increased for over a decade+.

I'd say it's due to low T levels reaching a tipping point/point of no return and lack of socialization skills due to constantly being on a screens rather than in person with people.

It was around but it didn't have many participants. Took ten years to get off the ground and that's when we saw multiple dating sites. (Yahoo, match, pof). Before that it was craigslist personals or your local newspaper. lol

 

[BackInTheGame78]

It was around but it didn't have many participants. Took ten years to get off the ground and that's when we saw multiple dating sites. (Yahoo, match, pof). Before that it was craigslist personals or your local newspaper. lol

That's not true...Match.com was around back then, started in 1995, and it was used back then even if nobody wanted to admit it.

 

[Gamisch]

That's not true...Match.com was around back then, started in 1995, and it was used back then even if nobody wanted to admit it.

But that's the thing. Using OLD , especially for men, was frowned upon. A " real man " didn't needed OLD to pull women. Women also didn't liked it untill they tasted from the sweet pool of endless attention .

Crazy how one simple technology caused so much harm.

 

[The Duke]

That's not true...Match.com was around back then, started in 1995, and it was used back then even if nobody wanted to admit it.

Lol, you get the point or you don't. I don't care.

 

[Gamisch]

Exactly. I was fecking with a young woman recently . We were hanging out when I made a joke about Tinder. Her response was:" why the hell would I need Tinder?".

Personally my biggest issue is the fact women will delete and unmatch real quick. It completely takes away my eagerness to have a "normal " conversation. If a woman likes me its easy to get her number and take it from there. Even then I see these women are bad conversationalists. During the golden era of OLD this wasn't that big of an issue.

Again all personal takes, but to me OLD always has a cowardly smell. Hard to explain this sentiment, but it seems unnatural to meet women like that. Like processed food, still food but it doesn't feel right.

By the way ,you will like these video. Numbers , facts and statistics AND rollo is in it.

I forgot to include the link, @SW15

But effective when one is starving.

Absolutely.

 

[SW15]

That's not true...Match.com was around back then, started in 1995, and it was used back then even if nobody wanted to admit it.

It was around but it didn't have many participants. Took ten years to get off the ground and that's when we saw multiple dating sites. (Yahoo, match, pof). Before that it was craigslist personals or your local newspaper. lol

The 1995-2005 era was an interesting time in the mating environment. Online dating was still fairly stigmatized during that time. Yes, people were using it, but it was looked down upon and not mainstream.

Before online dating websites took off, personal ads in newspapers were really frowned upon as well.

When I was in college (2001-2005), college students were not using the online dating websites to date much, unless they were social rejects. Now at college, there are students using Tinder/Bumble/Hinge.

 

[BackInTheGame78]

The 1995-2005 era was an interesting time in the mating environment. Online dating was still fairly stigmatized during that time. Yes, people were using it, but it was looked down upon and not mainstream.

Before online dating websites took off, personal ads in newspapers were really frowned upon as well.

When I was in college (2001-2005), college students were not using the online dating websites to date much, unless they were social rejects. Now at college, there are students using Tinder/Bumble/Hinge.

People claimed they weren't using it, but they were actually using it...making sure nobody was in the room with them as they secretly checked their accounts and never told anyone...

Plenty of people met online but told everyone they met elsewhere back then

 

[jaygreenb]

Coincides with the rise in online dating.

and access to porn, social media etc

 

[jaygreenb]

Online dating was around since the mid 1990s, why did it take 10 years to manifest if this was the case? The numbers of men having sex increased for over a decade+.

I'd say it's due to low T levels reaching a tipping point/point of no return and lack of socialization skills due to constantly being on a screens rather than in person with people.

It was definitely more fringe back then, im sure a piece of it is percentage of population using it but certainly other factors. Social media also gave women way more access to men outside of their direct area. Attention became a lot easier to access. T levels probably play a large role as well