You made your case like a lawyer. Stable job. Good guy. Ready for something real. All true. All irrelevant.
She weighed your points, nodded along, felt nothing — then fell hard for some tattooed bartender with a motorcycle and a gambling problem.
Logic is where attraction goes to die. The "22 Rules" work a level deeper, on the subconscious switches that decide within minutes whether you register as a MAN or as part of the furniture.
Stop presenting evidence. Start flipping switches.
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
Originally posted by BrotherAP
To suggest that women don't feel a need for a sexual intimacy from a man they love is to ignore the mounds of evidence in this world that suggests exactly the opposite. I seriously challenge you to mantain a LTR with a woman while denying her sex, and this does not include giving her some religious reason about wanting to wait until marriage. I mean, simply act uninterested in it. Say nothing of sex to her, and make no move to turn her on or respond to her advances. See how satisfied she is then, and how long she'll stick around.
And, for the record, I've never met a woman who genuinely didn't like sex who wasn't raped or abused earlier in life, or suffer from some sort of hormone imbalance or disease. In other words, sane, normal and healthy women also have a normal and healthy sex drive. We are sexual beings by nature, it's the reason we're here (not the purpose, but the cause mind you) so to suggest women need sex any less than men is ridiculous. The nature of our urges my differ slightly, and the conditions of us enjoying it may as well, but we all want sex one way or another.
And by that definition even the self-styled 'Don Juan's and 'PUA's of this website and ones like it are every bit as AFC as any guy out there. They sacrifice their time, their identities and their beliefs for sex. Many guys will go so far as to demonize and objectify women because in a bitter irony that attitude helps many guys get laid more - but the primary motivation is sex. Just look at how many guys here completely shun an actual connection with a girl beyond sex by labelling it "one-itis" and instead pursue having a harem of sex partners in which every women is expendable and they say that they are liberated from women using sex as a means of exerting power. That's like saying because you have five different incomes, you are no longer ruled by money. All you've done is make any one source unimportant by having others, but you'd be no less dependant if the option were removed completely.Originally posted by 00Kevin
Sexual desires can cause many men to become AFCs. AFCism is a direct result of allowing your sexual desires to take control of you.
The sad thing is that only after you "get a leg up" can you even begin to realize the root cause of your problems with women.Originally posted by BrotherAP
And by that definition even the self-styled 'Don Juan's and 'PUA's of this website and ones like it are every bit as AFC as any guy out there. They sacrifice their time, their identities and their beliefs for sex. Many guys will go so far as to demonize and objectify women because in a bitter irony that attitude helps many guys get laid more - but the primary motivation is sex. Just look at how many guys here completely shun an actual connection with a girl beyond sex by labelling it "one-itis" and instead pursue having a harem of sex partners in which every women is expendable and they say that they are liberated from women using sex as a means of exerting power. That's like saying because you have five different incomes, you are no longer ruled by money. All you've done is make any one source unimportant by having others, but you'd be no less dependant if the option were removed completely.
Your buddy Dave has been single for three years and thinks "hey u up" is a valid strategy. Your other buddy Mike just got dumped and told you to "just be yourself."
You showed them her text. You asked them to decode the emoji. You drafted four responses and sent the screenshot to the group chat for a vote.
She's been waiting forty minutes.
Put the phone down. Stop crowdsourcing your love life. Type something that sounds like you. Hit send. Then go do literally anything else with your evening.
I'm actually very aware of the power that witholding intimacy has - which is why I have to disagree with you about women disliking sex or wanting it less.Uhm,Brother Rapp just detailed a macking technique by mistake.
Lol.
You withould sex and intimacy and make her give YOU money & gifts to fawk.
But that's another subject..lol.
You've said it a hundred times. Maybe a thousand. And every time you say it, you train your brain to freeze the next time she walks into the room.
Leagues are a myth invented by guys who are scared of women.
She's a person. She has bad breath in the morning. She picks songs she can't sing in the shower. She overthinks her own texts.
Walk over. Say something. The league dissolves the second you open your mouth.
show me scientific proof that women are as horny, want sex and would fyck just as much if not more then men.
prove it.
Originally posted by frivolousz21
tell me if the media didnt label these women as *****s, 90% of women would be pornstars by now
prove it.but if every women was a slut it wouldn't matter because......no never mind, I promised not to post here again. Sorry
I dont have proof I dont need proof.Originally posted by frivolousz21
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
show me scientific proof that women are as horny, want sex and would fyck just as much if not more then men.
prove it.
That sentence contains at least five follow-up questions she WANTS you to ask. Where in Florida? What brought you here? How long have you been in the area? What do you miss? How does it compare to here?
She handed them to you on a silver platter. And you said, "Oh cool. I come here every week. I love this band. Ummm... pretty crowded tonight."
She smiled politely. Nodded. And never texted you back.
I was that guy for years. Talking too much. Listening too little. Panicking about my next sentence while she was literally feeding me the answers.
Then I found 22 rules that fixed the whole thing. Rule number one: shut up and listen. She'll tell you exactly what to say.
Wow, more than 20 girls, your a pimp. Lets all take sex advice from an EXPERT!Originally posted by frivolousz21
ive dated many women and slept with more then 20...
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.