Forget the cash, the cars, and the chiseled jawlines. Female desire operates on a completely different frequency. Primal. Subconscious. Triggers that bypass her logic and hit her on a gut level. Most guys are totally blind to them.
I know because I was one of them. The overthinking. The paralysis. The silent drive home kicking yourself for freezing up. Watching average guys walk away with the girl while you stood there stuck in your own head.
Then I decoded the psychology behind what actually makes women tick. 22 hard rules. Subtle behavioral shifts that rewired my entire reality. The anxiety evaporated. Women started leaning in. Investing. Chasing.
You can skip the expensive cars, the fancy clothes, and the endless gym selfies. Completely unnecessary.
I used to freeze the second a beautiful woman looked my way. Frustrated. Awkward. Watching other guys walk away with the girl while I stood there tongue-tied.
Then I discovered 22 simple rules that rewired my entire dating life. The anxiety vanished. Conversations flowed effortlessly. Women started chasing me for a change.
These rules trigger a woman's subconscious attraction switches. And you can start using them tonight.
What happens, IN HER MIND, is that she comes to see you as WORTHLESS simply because she hasn't had to INVEST anything in you in order to get you or to keep you.
You were an interesting diversion while she had nothing else to do. But now that someone a little more valuable has come along, someone who expects her to treat him very well, she'll have no problem at all dropping you or demoting you to lowly "friendship" status.
Quote taken from The SoSuave Guide to Women and Dating, which you can read for FREE.
Proabably not. He most likely did do what has been stated. Otherwise he would be standing up for himself and defending more than he currently is. He abused his power.just a bunch of upset women they got pumped and dumped by morgan freeman. That's the downside to being famous (Not that I would know but I'm assuming), every chick you bang sees $$$$$$ signs floating on your ceiling.
If Cosby is any indication, some of them did some pretty bad sh1t.Proabably not. He most likely did do what has been stated. Otherwise he would be standing up for himself and defending more than he currently is. He abused his power.
Of course. All men who have brought forth are guilty. And when they haven’t been, the accused make has stood up for himself greatly - TJ MillerIf Cosby is any indication, some of them did some pretty bad sh1t.
He’s done**** me dude, Morgan Freeman is the man. Like THE man. Hopefully nothing happens to him, the dude is a beast.
Studios don’t want anything to do with actors who are under scrutiny in the realm of deviant sexual behaviour. They have a legacy to worry about. Dropping an actor means nothing. If anything Netflix gains more fans by dropping Louis C.K., spacey, and the other bunch while solidifying it’s position as a reputable household name; which in-turn builds their brand void of being entangled within the web of drama.I love Morgan Freeman as much as anyone, but guys...banging girls with their complete consent is one thing, walking onto a movie set and just telling 10 women you like their tits and rubbing their asses whenever they're near you is another.
Hollywood seems to be filled with sexual deviancy to be honest (though of course what counts as that is open to debate). But everyone seems to f*ck everyone else, and sleazy people have been abusing their power for God knows how long.
I hope Morgan is not part of that, but defending a guy going around just grabbing chicks asses all over the place and peering up skirts in a work environment as "acceptable behaviour" is silly.
What DOES p*ss me off is how show runners immediately knee-jerk cancel shows and so on just because a star is now controversial. Kevin Spacey may well be a deviant creep, but House of Cards was f*cking awesome and he's a f*cking awesome actor. Instead of cancelling the whole show instantly before he's even been trialled or found guilty of anything, why not finish it one season early with him in the driving seat still, but under close surveillance and monitoring around other staff?
--
On the other hand, I find the way in which the accused is publically pilloried BEFORE trial absolutely disgusting in these cases. A female friend of mine was sexually assaulted, and the guy who did it was a total piece of s**t. HOWEVER...I don't think he, or any other accused person in a sex crimes trial, should be named before proven guilty. After yes, before no.
If the victim gets the right to anonymity, the accused should also get that until convicted. It's ridiculous that a woman I've never met before, in a country the other side of the world could accuse me of rape and immediately the next day the papers will say: "MORETHANSMOOTH SUSPECTED OF RAPE!"