Janez
Don Juan
Case closed. Lock the thread. Put it in the DJ bible.
(and someone might add "and ban the spammer" <D )
(and someone might add "and ban the spammer" <D )
I could talk to any woman I wasn't attracted to. Charming, funny, relaxed. Then a gorgeous woman looked my way and I'd become a sweating, babbling mess.
The fix took me years to find and ten minutes to learn. Nervousness and excitement are the same physical state — pounding heart, adrenaline, flushed face. Your brain just picks the label. And you can pick a better one.
Rule 16 shows you how. You feel the nerves, relabel them as excitement, and let that energy pour out as enthusiasm. Women notice the guy radiating it. They always do.
Dinner ran three hours. She laughed at everything. You walked her to her car thinking this one's locked in.
Then: nothing. Two texts. No reply. What happened?
You did what most men do on a great date. You filled every silence, answered every question, and left her with nothing to wonder about. No mystery. Nothing to sit with when she got home.
Rule 3 of the "22 Rules" changes the ending: tell her a little, hold back the rest, and let her imagination do the chasing. The ghosting stops too.
Yeah and there's pros and cons with everything. There's drawbacks to calling too.STR8UP said:There are a lot of points AGAINST texting that I don't deny.
Yeah how is calling, showing up on her caller id and getting her voicemail any better than sending a text, and more often than not getting a reply back? Texting is just a tool that depends on how you use it. You can probably tell who is actively gaming new girls and who's not. I can't imagine someone doing it without using texting.But I stick to my original point that texting is becoming more prevalent and is actually a BETTER form of communication in some cases.
People are busy and can't pick up the phone sometimes. If they don't pick up the phone do you leave a voicemail? How is this better than a text? I suppose it has the benefit of vocal tone in conveying the message, but other than that, how is it different?
It is nothing more than a TOOL that in and of itself is not inherently good or bad. It is HOW you use it that dictates whether it is beneficial to you or not.
I see your point, and I have caught myself texting chicks because I was more or less afraid of disturbing them. The fact is, though, that was AFC on my part. A DJ isnt afraid to intrude on a girls space. Obviously, if you know she's at work or something, texting is the way to go, if it's necessary to contact her. I've sent texts asking if she's busy. If she DOESNT SAY YES, I'll call. I assume a no reply as a no.the general idea is that txting is less intrusive to a girl's personal space
You've replayed it a hundred times. She stood three feet away, scrolling her phone. You had an opening. You composed the perfect line — after she was gone.
For all you know, she's married now. To some guy who said something. Anything.
Openers are cheap. Almost any sentence works when it's delivered within three seconds. The expensive part is the standing there, drafting and deleting, while the window quietly closes.
The "22 Rules" stripped out my hesitation. What to open with, how to keep it alive, and the one habit that costs guys more women than anything else: waiting for perfect.
If talking to a girl face to face were equally as convenient, which would you opt for? Your answer is what makes you a chump or not.MisterMcGee said:Texting is convenient for ME. That's why I use it.
How is that chumpish?
Answer: it isnt
Next Monday you'll feel more confident. After the gym you'll feel more confident. After one more drink you'll feel more confident. After you get a better haircut, a better jacket, a better job.
You've been "getting ready" for two years.
She's standing ten feet away right now. She'll be gone in four minutes. No amount of preparation will manufacture the courage that only comes from moving your feet.
Walk over. Stumble through the first sentence. Let it be clumsy. Let it be imperfect. You will feel more alive in those ten seconds than you have all month.
Face to face is ALWAYS the best method of communication.Rollo Tomassi said:If talking to a girl face to face were equally as convenient, which would you opt for? Your answer is what makes you a chump or not.
It's not. Yet, when calling, there's a chance she'll pick up - that won't happen with text. As such, why hand her yet another weapon for her arsenal by using texting to set things up?Yeah how is calling, showing up on her caller id and getting her voicemail any better than sending a text
I'd say don't do that, that's gonna send a signal of insecurity/impatience. Why not just call her in the first place?If you don't receive a text back in an hour, CALL and ask if she got it.
Which is why it's more of a buffer and why it's not as significantly useful/meaningful a tool as a phone call.txting is less intrusive to a girl's personal space
STR8UP this is a brilliant analogy. Like I said before, it makes little difference how you get her to the "store", whether it's through an "ad", phone call or text, they're all just tools and any of them can be used effectively or ineffectively. Texting is a medium that women use and it can be effective for getting them into the "store".STR8UP said:Face to face is ALWAYS the best method of communication.
I can relate with a little story that probably just goes to back up the claim of "texting is bad", but whatever. This isn't a black vs. white discussion.....
For the longest time I had problems with my sales people answering the telephone at my store.
The customer would be calling for the first time, never having been to the store, and was trying to get information. They would see our TV commercials and get on the phone and ask vague questions, trying to get an idea of whether it was worth it for them to drive to the store.
The employee would ramble on, answering the customers questions without any attempt to get the customer excited about coming into the store.
I had to sit them down and tell them point blank "We don't take phone orders! We can't sell the customer a goddamned thing until we get them IN THE STORE. That is your job. To get them off the phone and into the store. you tell them that you are really busy, and if they are looking for a SPECIFIC price on a SPECIFIC model number you will be happy to give it to them, but our store is way too big to run through the entire room trying to describe everything. YOU HAVE TO GET DOWN HERE. WE GOT DEALS. HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!"
It's the same thing with women and email/phone/text. They want to sit around for hours and yammer on and on to feel you out and and to get the emotional rush they get from "communicating". Your job as a man is to get them face to face so you can "close the deal".
They will never know how awesome your store is until you get them through the door.
Then put it on your profile.R19 said:(I'm over 25)
Three seconds. That's how long it took. Your shoes. Your posture. The way you held your drink. Whether you looked at the floor or looked at her.
She already filed you away. Interesting. Boring. Safe. Bold. Before you even opened your mouth.
Everything you say after that is just her confirming what she already decided.
So stop rehearsing lines. Fix the first three seconds. Stand tall. Look up. Smile like you mean it. Walk like you belong wherever you're standing.
The words come later. The impression comes first.
R19 said:I dislike texting women. It's so one dimensional. Why do so many chicks seem to love it so much?
(I'm over 25)
DMSR76 said:Simply put, because it's a passive form of communication. They can troll around you without "facing" you.